Genotype x Environment Effects on The Productivity Traits of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) II. Analysis of Genotype Reaction

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: Özel Sayı-1, 1198 - 1208, 01.03.2014

Nikolay Tsenov Todor Gubatov Dobrinka Atanasova Margarita Nankova Albena Ivanova

Öz

Situation and purpose: Twenty-seven genotypes were investigated, including four standard cultivars. The aim was to identify the most stable ones among them with regard to productivity under the conditions of both north and south Bulgaria, and to clarify the behavior of the cultivar with regard to grain yield according to the expression of its productivity components. Methods: To achieve the above aim, various statistical methods and approaches were applied to investigate the correlations of the traits, their variation and effect on grain yield. A method for spatial visualization of the cultivar’s behavior was used according to each of the traits depending on the environment of the respective investigated location over a three-year period. An Integral Breeding Assessment was made attempting to explain in detail the effect of the traits on grain yield (its level and stability). Key results: Each cultivar demonstrated unique behavior with regard to productivity (traits) and to grain yield itself. Their interaction with the environment was significant although there was no direct effect of the year on any of the traits. The year conditions, however, affected the expression of the traits through their interaction with the genotype, which was significant at the highest statistical level. The interactions between the productivity traits and the environment are complex and non-linear which makes the objective evaluation of the cultivar difficult. Conclusions: The traits varied by degree and direction which caused variation in the interactions both among themselves and with regard to yield. A correct evaluation of the plasticity and stability in relation to productivity can be made by applying an Integral Breeding Assessment (IBA) for each cultivar. The used model cultivars (Aglika, Sadovo 1 and Pryaspa) proved yet again that they have been correctly chosen as criterion for enhancing productivity and its stability

Anahtar Kelimeler

bread wheat, grain yield, genotype by environment interaction, components of grain productivity

Genotype x Environment Effects on The Productivity Traits of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) II. Analysis of Genotype Reaction

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Acuna T. A, G. Dean, and P. Riffkin, 2011. Constraints to achieving high potential yield of wheat environment in south-eastern Australia, Crop & Pasture Science, 62: 125–136. high-rainfall
• Aycicek M. and T. Yilderim, 2006. Adaptability performances of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in the Eastern region of Turkey International Journal of Science & Technology 1: 83-89.
• Anderson W.K. A.J. van Burgel, D.L. Sharma, B. J. Shakcley, C.M. Zaicou-Kunesch, M.S. Miyan, M. Amjad, 2011. Assessing specific agronomic response of wheat cultivars in a winter rainfall environment Crop & Pasture Science 62: 115- 124.
• Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Defining adaptation strategies and yield stability targets in breeding programmes. In M.S. Kang, ed. Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding, p. 365-383. Wallingford, UK, CABI.
• Becker H. and J. Leon, 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding, Plant Breeding 101:1-23
• Bustos, D. A.K. Hasan, M. Reynolds, D.F. Calderini, 2013. Combining high grain number and weight through a DH-population to improve grain yield potential of wheat in high-yielding environments. Field Crop Res. 145:106-113.
• Chamurliyski P. N. Tsenov, 2013. Stability of grain yield in modern Bulgarian winter wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) in Dobrudzha, Agricultural Science and Technology 5(1):16-21
• Chapman S.C. 2008. Use of crop models to understand interactions for drought in real world and simulated plant breeding trials, Euphytica, 164: 195-208. by environment
• Gaju, O. M. Raynolds, D.L. Sparkes, M.J. Foulkes, 2009. phenotype, grain number, and yield potential in spring wheat, Crop Science 49: 961-973.
• Georgiev S, N. Ganusheva, S. Stamatov, M. Deshev, 2013. Approaches and methods such as model for Academic Publishing Agricultural University, Plovdiv, pp. 276. crops,
• Genchev, D. 2011. Plasticity and stability of productivity of new dry bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crop Studies 7(2): 313-333 (In Bul)
• Hagos, H.G., F. Abay, 2013. AMMI anf GGE Biplot analysis of bread wheat genotypes in the Northern part of Ethiopia. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 1: 12-18.
• Kang M, 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability Consequence for growers. Agronomy Journal, 85, 3, 754-757. performance trails:
• Pacheco, R.M., J.B. Duarte, R. Vencovsky, J.B. Pincheiro, A.B. Oliveira, 2005. Use of supplementary genotypes in AAMMI analysis, Theo. Appl. Genet 110(5): 812-818.
• Parveen, L., I. H. Khalil, S. K. Khalil, 2010. Stability parameters for tillers, grain weight and yield of wheat cultivars in North-West of Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42 (3): 1613-1617.
• Slafer G.A. R. Savin, V. Sandras, 2014. Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crop Research 157: 71-83.
• Smiriaev A. V. S.P. Martinov, A.V. Kilchevski, 1992. Biometrics in plant genetics and breeding, MSHA Publishing, pp. 269 (in Rus)
• Tsenov N, T. Gubatov and V. Peeva 2006. Study on the genotype x environment interaction in winter wheat varieties II. Grain yield, Field Crop Studies, 3(2): 167-175.
• Tsenov N., D. Atanasova, I. Stoeva, T. Petrova, 2010. Grain yield, end-use quality and stress resistance of winter wheat cultivars Aglika and Slaveya Scientific Works 55(1): 27-34. University, Plovdiv,
• Tsenov N., D. Atanasova, T. Gubatov, 2011a. Genotype х environment interactions in grain yield of winter bread wheat grown in Bulgaria, In: Veitz, O. (Ed.) "Climate Change: Challenges and opportunities in Agriculture", Proc. AGRISAFE final conference, March 21-23, 2011, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 356-359
• Kostov K. G. Rachovska, K. Kuzmova, Z. Yr, 2011. Effect of cultivar and climate of wheat productivity under different environments in Bulgaria. In: Veitz, O. (Ed.) "Climate Change: Challenges and opportunities in Agriculture", Proc. AGRISAFE final conference, March 21-23, 2011, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 308-311
• Tsenov N., I. Stoeva, T. Gubatov, V. Peeva, 2011b. Variability and stability of yield and end-use quality of grain of several bread wheat cultivars Agricultural Science and Technology 3(2): 81-87.
• Tsenov N. and D.Atanasova, 2013a. Influence of environments on the amount and stability of grain yield in today‘s winter wheat cultivars, I. Interaction Agricultural Science and Technology 5:153-159 of variability,
• Tsenov N., D. Atanasova1, T Gubatov, 2013. Genotype x environment interaction effects on the productivity traits of common wheat, I. nature of interaction, International Scientific Conference of Breeding and Agronomy of field crops, Karnobat, Nov. 2013. pp. (in press)
• Yagdi K. 2009. Path coefficient analysis of some yield components in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf,) Pak. J. Botany 41: 745-751.
• Yan W., L. A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics, 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot, Crop Science, 40: 597-605.