Determination of Host Preferences of Medfly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in the Laboratory

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 292 - 301, 25.07.2017

Hanife Genç Seda Yücel

Öz

The Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), is the
most important and destructive pest in the world. The aim of this study was to
determine host preference and survival of Medfly in different fruit and
vegetable cultivars in the laboratory. Medfly was recently established in
Çanakkale province, even though it has been known in southern Turkey for many
years. Medfly infested peaches were collected to establish a local laboratory
population. Ten different hosts were tested in the controlled laboratory
conditions. Some biological parameters were observed to find out the preferred
and appropriate host for laboratory rearing. The tested fruit weight, the
number of oviposition stings, pupal yield and the adult emergence were
determined. The results showed that fruit weight and oviposition stings were
not related with larval survival or pupal yield of Medfly. Screening of the
different host cultivars suggested that red sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. “Kapya”) is the most favorable host for Medfly
rearing in the laboratory conditions. Therefore, ovipositional
preference of Medfly and the success of larval development in different host
varieties are crucial for Çanakkale since it is an important city for exporting
fruit and vegetables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Medfly, Mediterranean fruit fly, Çanakkale, oviposition sting

Akdeniz Meyve Sineği’nin, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), Laboratuvarda Konukçu Tercihinin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Akdeniz meyve sineği, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), dünyada çok önemli zararlar meydana
getiren türdür. Çalışmanın amacı, laboratuvarda Akdeniz meyve sineğinin, farklı
meyve ve sebze türlerini tercih etme durumunun ve canlılık oranların
belirlenmesidir. Akdeniz meyve sineği uzun yıllardır Türkiye’nin güneyinde
bulunmasına rağmen, Çanakkale ve çevresinde yakın zamanda tespit edilmiştir.
Laboratuvar koşullarında 10 farklı konukçu test edildi. Laboratuvarda
yetiştirilmesinde tercih edilen ve en uygun konukçunun belirlenmesi için bazı
biyolojik parametreler değerlendirildi. Test edilen meyvenin ağırlığı, yumurta
izi sayısı, pupa sayısı ve ergin çıkışları belirlendi. Sonuç olarak, meyve
ağırlığı ve yumurta izi sayısının Akdeniz meyve sineğinin larva canlılığına ve
pupa miktarına bağlı olmadığı tespit edildi. Farklı konukçuların test edilmesi
sonucunda, kırmızı tatlı biber (Capsicum annuum L. var. “Kapya”) ‘in laboratuvar koşullarında Akdeniz meyve sineğinin
yetiştirilmesinde en fazla tercih edildiği belirlendi. Dolayısıyla, Akdeniz
meyve sineğinin yumurta bırakma tercihi, farklı konukçularda larva gelişme
başarısı meyve ve sebzelerin ihracatında önemli bir şehir olana Çanakkale için
oldukça mühimdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akdeniz meyve sineği, Çanakkale, yumurta bırakma izi

Kaynakça

• Aluja, A., Mangan, R.L. 2008. Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) host status determination: critical conceptual, methodological, and regulatory considerations. Annual Review of Entomology, 53: 473-502.
• Anonymus, 2017. http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/12367 (Accessed on: 18/05/2017).
• CABI/EPPO, 2015. Ceratitis capitata. [Distribution map]. Distribution Maps of Plant Pests, No.December. Wallingford, UK: CABI, Map 1.
• Carey, J.R., Papadopoulos, N.T., Müller, H.G., Katsoyannos, B.I., Kouloussis, N.A., Wang, J.L., K. Wachter., Yu, W., Liedo, P. 2008. Age structure changes and extraordinary lifespan in wild medfly populations. Aging Cell, 7(3): 426-437. Christenson, L., D Foote, R. H. 1960. Biology of fruit flies”, Annual Review of Entomology, 5: 171-192.
• Clausen, C.P. 1978. Tephritidae (Trypetidae, Trupaneidae)”, In: Clausen CP, ed. Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. Agricultural Handbook, United States Department of Agriculture, 480-pp. 320-335.
• Costa, A.M., Amorim, F.O., Anjos-Duarte, C.S., Cyntia, S., Joachim-Bravo, I.S., Iara, S. 2011. Influence of different tropical fruits on biological and behavioral aspects of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera, Tephritidae)” Rev. Bras. entomol. [online]. 55(3): 355-360.
• Cunningham, R.T. 1989. Biology and physiology; parapheromones, In: Robinson AS, Hooper G, eds. Fruit Flies; Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 3(A): 221-230. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
• Cunningham, R.T. 1989. Control; insecticides; male annihilation”. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G, eds. Fruit Flies; Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests 3(B): 345-351. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
• Duyck, P.F., Quilici, S. 2002. Survival and development of different life stages of three Ceratitis spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared at five constant temperatures. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 92 (6):461-469.
• Edwards, P.J., Wratten, S.D. 1980. Ecology of Insect-Plant Interactions. London, Edward Arnold Publishers, IV, + p. 60. Enkerlin, W.R. 2005. Impact of fruit fly control programmes using the sterileinsect technique”. In: Dyck, V.A., Hendrichs, J., Robinson, A.S., editors. Sterile insect technique - principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 651-76.
• EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm (Accessed on: 18/05/2017).
• Fernandes-da-Silva, P.G., Zucoloto, F.S. 1993. The influence of host nutritive value on the performance and food selection in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae)”, Journal of Insect Physiology. 39: 883-887.
• Fletcher, B.S.1989. Ecology; movements of tephritid fruit flies”. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G, eds. Fruit Flies; Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, 3(B). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp-209-219.
• Gasperi, G., Guglielmino, C.R., Malacrida A.R., Milani, R. 1991. Genetic variability and gene flow in geographical populations of Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (medfly). Heredity (Edinb), 67: 347-56.
• Gasparich, G.E., Silva, J.G., HoYeon, Han., McPheron, B.A., Steck, G.J., Sheppard, W.S. 1997. Population genetic structure of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and implications for worldwide colonization patterns. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 90 (6):790-797.
• Gasperi, G., Bonizzoni, M.L., Gomulski, M.V., Murelli, C., Torti, A., Malacrida, R., Guglielmino, C. R. 2002. Genetic differentiation, gene flow and the origin of infestations of the medfly, Ceratitis capitata”. Genetica, 116 (1): 25-135.
• Genc, H., Nation, J.L. 2008. Maintaining of Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) colony on its natural host in the laboratory. J. Pest Sci., 81(3):167-174.
• Genc, H. 2016. Infestations of Olive Fruit Fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Different Olive Cultivars in Çanakkale, Turkey”. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering 10(7): 385-388.
• Gilmore, J.E. 1989. Control; sterile insect technique (SIT); overview”. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G, eds. Fruit Flies; Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests 3(B). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp-353-363.
• Janz, N. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of oviposition strategies”, p. 349-376. In: M. Hilker & T. Meiners. Chemoecology of Insect Eggs and Egg Deposition, Berlin, Blackwell, p. 2002.
• Kolbe M. E., Eskafi, F. M. 1989. Method to rank host plants infested with Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata in multiple host situation in Guatemala. Florida Entomologist vol. 72: 708–711.
• Liquido, N.J., Shinoda L.A., Cunningham, R.T. 1991. Host plants of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). An annotated world list, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am, 77: 1-57.
• Malacrida, A.R., Guglielmino, C.R., Gasperi, G., Baruffi, L., Milani, R. 1992. Spatial and temporal differentiation in colonizing populations of Ceratitis capitata. Heredity, 69: 101-111.
• Malacrida, A.R., Gomulski, L.M., Bonizzoni, M., Bertin, S., Gasperi, G., Guglielmino, C.R. 2007. Globalization and fruitfly invasion and expansion: the medfly paradigm. Genetica, 131(1): 1-9.
• Malacrida, A.R., Marinoni, F., Torti, C., Gomulski, L.M., Sebastiani, F., Bonvicini, C., Gasperi, G., Guglielmino, C.R. 1998. Genetic aspects of the worldwide colonization process of Ceratitis capitata. Journal of Heredity, 89(6): 501-507.
• Papanicolaou, A., Schetelig, M.F., Arensburger, P., Atkinson, P.W., Benoit, J.B., Bourtzis, K., Castanera, P., Cavanaugh, J., Chao, H., Childers, C., Curril, I., Dinh, H., Doddapaneni, H., Dolan, A., Dugan, S., Friedrich, M., Gasperi, G., Geib, S., Georgakilas, G., Gibbs, R.A., Giers, S.D., Gomulski, L.M., Gonzalez-Guzman, M., Guillem-Amat, A., Han, Y., Hatzigeorgiou, A.G., Hernandez-Crespo, P., Hughes, D.S.T., Jones, J.W., Karagkouni, D., Koskinioti, P., Lee, S.L., Malacrida, A.R., Manni, A., Mathiopoulos, K., Meccariello, A., Murali, S.C., Murphy, T.D., Muzny, D.M., Oberhofer, G., Ortego, F., Paraskevopoulou, M.D., Poelchau, M., Qu, J., Reczko, M., Robertson, H.M., Rosendale, A.J., Rosselot, A.E., Saccone, G., Salvemini, M., Savini, G., Schreiner, P., Scolari, F., Siciliano, P., Sim, S.B., Tsiamis, G., Urena, E., Vlachos, I.S., Werren, J.H., Worley, E.A., Zacharopoulou, K.C., Richards, A.S., Handler, A.M. 2016. The whole genome sequence of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratatis capitata (Wiedemann), reveals insights into the biology and adaptive evolution of a highly invasive pest species. Genome Biology Vol. 17, pp-192. 2016.
• Thompson, J.N., Pelmyr, O. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology vol. 36: 65-89.