Assessment of Buccal Bone Thickness in the Anterior Maxilla: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 102 - 107, 13.03.2019

Alaettin Koç İdris Kavut Mehmet Uğur

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.494676

Cited By: 6

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate buccal bone thickness by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in patients in both genders and in different age groups.

Materials and Methods: Our study included 186 anterior teeth and 62 patients with CBCT images. Buccal bone thickness was measured at the crest level, and at a distance 1 and 2 mm apical to the crest level. The t-test and ANOVA test were used in analyzing data.

Results: It was found out that age and gender were not significantly associated with the buccal bone thickness of anterior teeth (p>0.05). The mean buccal bone thickness was the highest as 1.91 mm around the right canines and it was the lowest as 0.35 mm surrounding the right lateral incisor.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the mean buccal bone thickness increased towards the apical region for all three teeth types. CBCT precisely measures the maxillary bone thickness and may facilitate the planning process for placing implants and scheduling other types of surgeries correctly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cone-beam computed tomography, Maxilla, Alveolar bone loss

Kaynakça

• 1. Coots BK. Alveolar bone grafting: past, present, and new horizons. Semin Plast Surg 2012;26(4):178-183.
• 2. Garg AK. Bone, biology, harvesting, grafting for dental implants. Chicago: Quintessence; 2004.
• 3. Deshpande S, Deshmukh J, Deshpande S, Khatri R, Deshpande S. Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior maxilla using autograft, xenograft and titanium mesh with simultaneous placement of endosseous implants. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18(5):661.
• 4. Poli PP, Beretta M, Cicciù M, Maiorana C. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh. A retrospective clinical study. Open Dent J 2014;8:148.
• 5. Sukovic P, Brooks S, Perez L, Clinthorne N, editors. DentoCAT-a novel design of a cone-beam CT scanner for dentomaxillofacial imaging: introduction and preliminary results. Int Congr Ser 2001.
• 6. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post‐extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1-21.
• 7. El Nahass H, N. Naiem S. Analysis of the dimensions of the labial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone‐beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26(4):e57-e61.
• 8. Arora H, Ivanovski S. Correlation between pre‐operative buccal bone thickness and soft tissue changes around immediately placed and restored implants in the maxillary anterior region: A 2‐year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28(10):1188-94.
• 9. Kim YJ, Park JM, Kim S, Koo KT, Seol YJ, Lee YM, et al. New method of assessing the relationship between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46(6):372-81.
• 10. Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone‐beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(10):1168-71.
• 11. La Rocca AP, Alemany AS, Levi Jr P, Juan MV, Molina JN, Weisgold AS. Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness. Implant Dent 2012;21(6):507-15.
• 12. Nikiforidou M, Tsalikis L, Angelopoulos C, Menexes G, Vouros I, Konstantinides A. Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20(8):2061-71.
• 13. Younes F, Eghbali A, Raes M, De Bruyckere T, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Relationship between buccal bone and gingival thickness revisited using non‐invasive registration methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27(5):523-8.
• 14. Esfahanizadeh N, Daneshparvar N, Askarpour F, Akhoundi N, Panjnoush M. Correlation Between Bone and Soft Tissue Thickness in Maxillary Anterior Teeth. J Dent (Tehran) 2016;13(5):302-8.
• 15. Fu J-H, Lee A, Wang H-L. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(3).
• 16. Khoury J, Ghosn N, Mokbel N, Naaman N. Buccal Bone Thickness Overlying Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Clinical and Radiographic Prospective Human Study. Implant Dent 2016;25(4):525-31.
• 17. Zhang CY, DeBaz C, Bhandal G, Alli F, Francisco MCB, Thacker HL, et al. Buccal bone thickness in the esthetic zone of postmenopausal women: A CBCT analysis. Implant Dent 2016;25(4):478-84.
• 18. Morais JF, Melsen B, de Freitas KMS, Castello Branco N, Garib DG, Cattaneo PM. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod 2018.
• 19. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone EF. Buccal-Lingual Bone Remodeling in Immediately Loaded Fresh Socket Implants: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;35(1):43-9.
• 20. Adiguzel O, Aktuna Belgin C, Falakaloglu S, Cangul S, Akkus Z. Maxillary Cortical Bone Thickness in a South-Eastern Anatolian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Med Sci Monit 2017;23:5812-7.
• 21. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000;5(1):119-28.
• 22. Fu J-H, Yeh C-Y, Chan H-L, Tatarakis N, Leong DJ, Wang H-L. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol 2010;81(4):569-74.
• 23. Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti T, D'addona A. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol 2012;83(2):187-97.
• 24. Fuentes R, Flores T, Navarro P, Salamanca C, Beltrán V, Borie E. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2015;45(5):162-8.