The Effect of Heat Application on Fluoride Release in Antibacterial Added Glass Ionomer Cement

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 218 - 225, 31.05.2019

Ayça Kurt Tamer Tüzüner İlkay Altıntepe Sema Aydınoğlu Münevver Sökmen

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.502880

Cited By: 1

Öz

Objectives: This study aimed to
evaluate the effect of heating on the fluoride releasing of glass ionomer
cement (GIC) combined with 5% CPC (experimental) or not (control).

Materials and
Methods: Twenty (n=5; each group)
GIC samples were prepared with or without 5% CPC powder. The samples were
prepared as non-heating (NH) (n=10) or by heating (H) for 60s (H) (n=10) with a
Light Emitting Diode. Flouride releasing pattern was obtained at days 1, 7, 15
and 30. Repeated measurements of two-way ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD test was used
for comparisons (p<0.05).

Results: Interaction (groups x
heating x time) effects were obtained (p<0.001). There was no significant
difference in fluoride release from the NH control and experimental groups on
days 1, 7 and 15, but there was a significant release  in the experimental group at 30 days (p =
0.01). Significantly higher values were obtained in H procedures at days 1
(p=0.026), 7 (p=0.001), 15 (p=0.005) and 30 (p=0.028) for control group
compared to the experimental. Significantly increased values were obtained from
days 1 up to 30 in NH and H procedures for both groups (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Heating of both control and
experimental groups showed increased fluoride releasing pattern. The fluoride
releasing of 60s heating of GIC containing 5% CPC could have acceptable
increased values up to 30 days. The increased fluoride releasing pattern after
heating procedure seems to be promising for antibacterial GIC combinations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

antibacterial agents, fluoride release, glass ionomer cement, heat effect

Kaynakça

• 1.Ismail AI. Reactor paper: minimal intervention techniques for dental caries. J Public Health Dent 1996; 56: 155–160.
• 2.Mjor IA, Gordan VV. A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). IntDent J 1999;49:27-131.
• 3.Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM. A continued need worldwide. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 119–125.
• 4.Pilot T. Introduction-ART from global perspective. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27: 421–422.
• 5.Chkir AF, Salem KB, Volu KA. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass ionomer sealants in Tunisian children: survival after 3 years. East Mediter Health J 2002; 23: 200–204.
• 6.van Amerongen WE. Dental caries under glass ionomer restorations. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 1996; 56: 150–4. discussion 61–3.
• 7.Gu YW, Yap AU, Cheang P, Khor KA. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO(2) into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomaterials 2005; 26:13-20.
• 8.Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LV, Narhi T, Vallitu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dental Materials 2005; 21: 201-9.
• 9. Dabsie F, Gregoire G, Sixou M, Sharrock P. Does strontiumplay a role in the cariostatic activity of glass ionomer? Strontium diffusion and antibacterial activity. Journal of Dentistry 2009; 37: 554-9.
• 10.Botelho MG. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 2003; 37: 108-114.
• 11.Ribeiro J, Ericson D. In vitro antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine added to glass-ionomer cements. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99: 533-540.
• 12. Sanders BJ, Gregory RL, Moore K, Avery DR. Antibacterial and physical properties of resin modified glass-ionomers combined with chlorhexidine. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 553-558.
• 13.Botelho MG. The antimicrobial activity of a dentin conditioner combined with antibacterial agents. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 75-82.
• 14.Botelho MG. Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements with dental antibacterial agents. Sadj 2004; 59: 51-53.
• 15.Albert-Kiszely A, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Witt J, Hamilton A, Persson GR, Lang NP. Comparison of the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride with an essential oil mouth rinse on dental plaque and gingivitis - a six-month randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 658-67.
• 16.Haps S, Slot DE, Berchier CE,Van der Weijden GA. The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride-containing mouth rinses as adjuncts to toothbrushing on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2008; 6: 290-303.
• 17.Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 449-457.
• 18.Palmer G, Jones FH, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5423-5431.
• 19.Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 647-652.
• 20.Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H. The long-term interaction of dental cements with lactic acid solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1991; 10: 449-452.
• 21.De Witte AM, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM, Martens LC. Fluoride release profiles of mature restorative glass ionomer cements after fluoride application. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 475-482.
• 22. Botelho MG. The microtensile bond strength of Fuji IX glass ionomer cement to antibacterial conditioned dentin. Oper Den 2005; 30: 311-317.
• 23.Hoszek A, Ericson D. In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 696-701.
• 24.Towler MR, Bushby AJ, Billington RW, Hill RG. A preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties of chemically cured and ultrasonically cured glass ionomer cements, using nano-indentation techniques. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 1401-1406.
• 25.Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RNB, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 45-50.
• 26.Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strengthof glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 472-476.
• 27.Tanner DA, Rushe N, Towler MR. Ultrasonically set glass polyalkenoate cements for orthodontic applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006; 17: 313-318.
• 28.Prabhakar AR, Prahlad D, Kumar SR. Antibacterial activity, fluoride release, and physical properties of an antibiotic- modified glass ionomer cement. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: 411-415.
• 29. Tam LE, Chan GP, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 4–14.
• 30.McComb D, Ericson D. Antimicrobial action of new, proprietary lining cements. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1025–8.
• 31. DeSchepper EJ, White RR, von der Lehr W. Antibacterial effect of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 51–6.
• 32. Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Delmée M, Vreven J. Antibacterial activity of glassionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 368–74.
• 33. Miller BH, Komatsu H, Nakajima H, Okabe T. Effect of glass ionomer manipulation on early fluoride release. Am J Dent 1995;8: 182–6.34.Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 93-97.
• 34. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 93-97.
• 35. Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M. Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3787- 3794.
• 36. Tüzüner T, Kuşgöz A, Er K, Taşdemir T, Buruk K, Kemer B, Saray O. Antibacterial activity and physical properties of conventional glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine diacetate/cetrimide mixtures. J Esthet Rest Dent 2011; 23: 46-55.
• 37. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM,Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent 2011; 39: 589-598.
• 38.Hoszek A, Ericson D. In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 696-701.
• 39.Hu J, Du X, Huang C, Fu D, Ouyang X,Wang Y. Antibacterial and physical properties of EGCG-containing glass ionomer cements. J Dent 2013; 41: 927-934.
• 40.Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P, Sfeikos T. Effect of Three Clinical Curing Treatments on Fluoride Release and Surface Hardness of Glass-Ionomer Cements. Int J Periodontics RestorativeDent 2017; 37: e197-e203.
• 41.Tolidis K, Dionysopoulos D, Gerasimou P, Sfeikos T. Effect of radiant heat and ultrasound on fluoride release and surface hardness of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016 2; 14: e463-e469.
• 42. . Rafeek RN. The effects of heat treatment on selected properties of a conventional and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 1913-20.