Çin’in Yükselişi Bağlamında Çin-Orta ve Doğu Avrupa İşbirliği: Realist Bir Bakış Açısı

Abstract

2008-2009 küresel finansal krizin ardından Çin, ekonomik ve siyasi çıkarları için ODA bölgesinde güç rekabetine girmeye başladı. AB, Çin'in ODA’daki etkisinin artmasını kendi bütünlüğüne ve AB üye devletlerinin çıkarlarına yönelik bir tehdit olarak görmektedir. Çalışma, Çin-ODA işbirliğinin temelinin Çin'in yükselişine hizmet eden, Çin'in küresel ekonomik gücünü en üst düzeye çıkarmayı hedefleyen ve Çin çıkarlarını ön planda tutan realist bir düşünceye dayandığını ileri sürmektedir. Çalışma, Çin'in ODA’daki güç rekabetine dahil olmasının altında yatan temel motivasyonları, Çin'in ODA’da artan etkisinin AB ve Almanya gibi bölgedeki baskın aktörler üzerindeki etkisini ve ayrıca onların Çin-ODA işbirliğine yönelik tutumlarını realist bir perspektiften ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

• Çin
• Orta ve Doğu Avrupa
• Avrupa Birliği
• Çin’in Yükselişi
• Realist Düşünce.

CHINA - CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE COOPERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RISE OF CHINA: A REALIST PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

Following the 2008–2009 global financial crisis, China began to engage in power competition in the CEE region for its economic and political interests. The EU regards the increase of Chinese influence in the CEE as a threat to its integrity and the interests of EU member states. The study argues that the basis of China-CEE cooperation is based on a realist thought that serves China's rise, aims to maximize China's economic power, and prioritizes Chinese interests. The study presents the basic motivations underlying China's involvement in power competition in the CEE, the impact of China’s growing influence in the CEE on the dominant actors in the region, such as the EU and Germany, and also their attitudes towards China-CEE cooperation from a realist perspective.

Keywords

• China
• Central and Eastern Europe
• European Union
• China’s Rise
• Realist Thinking.

References

1. “Budapest to Belgrade.” CEPA, April 24, 2020. Date of Access: 28 May, 2023. https://cepa.org/article/budapest-to-belgrade/. “EU Must Resist Chinese Attempts to Divide it – Maas.” Reuters, June 13, 2018. Date of Access: March 14, 2022.
2. https://www.reuters.com/article/germany-europe-maas-china-idINS8N1PX049. “German Minister Urges Fast Passage of EU law on Chinese Takeovers.” Reuters, January 28, 2018. Date of Access: March 28, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-china-mergers-idUSKBN1FG0XF.
3. “Poland Voices Concern About 'Dangerous' Russia-China Alliance.” The Moscow Times, March 22, 2023. Date of Access: May 29, 2023. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/03/22/poland-voices-concern-about-dangerous-russia-china-alliance-a80575.
4. Baculska, Alicja. “Central and Eastern Europe is no Chinese Trojan Horse.” EASTASIAFORUM, December 5, 2020. Date of Access: February 02, 2023. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/12/05/central-and-eastern-europe-is-no-chinese-trojan-horse/.
5. Bond, Ian. “China and Russia: Are there limits to ‘no limits’ friendship?.” Centre For European Reform, (2022):1. Date of Access: May 29, 2023. https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_IB_ChinaRussia_15.12.22.pdf.
6. Brattberg, Philippe, Le Corre, Paul Stronski, Thomas de Waal. “China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries.” Carniege Endowment for International Peace, (2021):9. Date of Access: February 20, 2023. https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/13/ china-s-influence-in-southeastern-central-and-eastern-europe-vulnerabilities-and-resilience-in-four-countries-pub-85415.
7. Budeanu, Andreea I. “16+1 in China-EU Relations: A vehicle for a Sustainable Connectivity Platform.” inside 16+1 Cooperation and China-EU Relationships, ed. Chen Xin and He Zhiago, 56-69. Budapest: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd., 2018.
8. Cai, Peter. “Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2017. Date of Access: February 15, 2023. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/understanding-china-s-belt-road-initiative.

9. Carlson, Brian G. “Fading or Staying? China’s International Standing After the Ukraine Invasion.” The Future of Xi's China. Scenarios and Implications for Europe, ed. Alessia Amighini, 97-113. Milan: Ledizioni LediPublishing, 2022.
10. Carlson, Brian G. “Russia’s War in Ukraine.” Policy Perspective 13, no 13 (2022):1-2.
11. Cheng, Joseph Y. and Franklin W. Zhang, “Chinese Foreign Relation Strategies under Mao and Deng: A Systematic and Comparative Analysis.” Politics and Governance 14, no 3 (2009):91-114.
12. China Global Investment Tracker. “Worldwide Chinese Investments & Construction (2005 - 2023).” Date of Access: March 15, 202. https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/.
13. Choudhury, Suvolaxmi D. “Sun Tzu’s the Art of War through the Prism of Political Realism.” Economic and Political Weekly 53, no 2 (2018):39-45.
14. Conley Heather A., Jonathan E. Hillman, Donatienne Ruy and Maesea McCalpin. “China’s “Hub-and-Spoke” Strategy in the Balkans.” CSIS, (2020): 12. Date of Access: March 20, 2023. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/200427_ChinaStrategy.pdf.
15. Dimitrijević, Duško. “Chinese Investments in Serbia-A Joint Pledge for the Future of the New Silk Road.” Baltic Journal of European Studies 7, no 1 (2017):64-83.
16. Dimitrijević, Duško and Nicola Jokanovic. “CEEC’s-China Mechanism of Cooperation and the Belt and Road Initiative: From Idea to Institutionalisation - Six Years Later.” Medjunarodni Problemi 72, no 2 (2020):311-336.
17. Ding, Arthur S. and Jagannath P. Panda. “Preface.” inside Chinese Politics and Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping: The Future Political, ed. Arthur S. Ding ve Jagannath P. Panda, xxv-xxix. Oxon: Routledge, 2021.
18. European Commission. “EU-China – A Strategic Outlook.” JOIN (2019) 5 final, 2019, Date of Access: March 15, 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/communication-eu-china-a-strategic-outlook.pdf.
19. European Commission, “Global Gateway,” Date of Access: May 24, 2023, https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/stronger-europe-world/global-gateway_en.
20. European Commission. “State of the Union 2017 - Trade Package: European Commission Proposes Framework for Screening of Foreign Direct Investments.” Press Release, September 14, 2017. Date of Access: March 15. 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_3183.
21. European Court of Auditors. “The EU's Response to China's State-Driven Investment Strategy.” Review no3, (2020):1-83. Date of Access: March 10, 2023. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/RW20_03/RW_EU_response_to_China_EN.pdf.
22. European Student Think Thank. “A Liberal and Realist Perspective of China’s Rise.” June 25, 2016. Date of Access: February 10, 2023. https://esthinktank.com/2016/08/25/a-liberal-and-realist-perspective-of-chinas-rise/.
23. European Union External Service. “EU-China Relations Factsheet.” April 1, 2022. Date of Access: March 20. 2023, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-china-relations-factsheet_en.
24. Gabuev, Alexander. “China’s New Vassal: How the War in Ukraine Turned Moscow Into Beijing’s Junior Partner.” Foreign Affairs, August 9, 2022. Date of Access: March 28, 2023. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/chinas-new-vassal.
25. Garlick, Jeremy . “China’s Economic Diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe: A Case of Offensive Mercantilism?.” Europe Asia Studies 71, no 8 (2019):1390 1414.
26. Gaspers, Jan. “China’s “16+1” Equals Much A Do About Nothing?,” Reconnecting Asia, December 5, 2017. Date of Access: March 2, 2023. https://reconasia.csis.org/chinas-161-equals-much-ado-about-nothing/.
27. Ghiasy, Richard and Jiayi Zhou, “The Silk Road Economic Belt: Considering Security Implications and EU-China Cooperation Prospects.” Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, (2017):1-60. Date of Access: February 18, 2023, https://www.sipri.org/publications/2017/other-publications/silk-road-economic-belt.
28. Gisela Grieger, “The EU Response to the 16+1 Format.” European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 625.173, (2018): 1-8. Date of Access: January 20, 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/625173/EPRS_BRI(2018)625173_EN.pdf.
29. Glaser, Charles. “Will China’s Rise Lead to War? Why Realism Does not Mean Pessimism.” Foreign Affairs 90, no 2 (2011):80-91.
30. Golonka, Marta. Partners or Rivals?: Chinese Investments in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: Central and Eastern European Development Institute, 2012. Górski, Jędrzej, Julien Chaisse, Manjiao Chi, Ahmad Manzoor, and Teresa Cheng. “One Belt One Road Initiative ('OBOR'): Editorial.” Transnational Dispute Management 14, no 3 (2017):1-8. Date of Access: February 4, 2023. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3051785.
31. Green Finance and Development Center. “Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative.” Date of Access: February 15, 2023. https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri/.
32. Grgic, Mladen. “Chinese infrastructural investments in the Balkans: Political Implications of the Highway Project in Montenegro.” Territory Politics Governance 7, no 89 (2017):1-19.
33. Grieger, Gisele. “One Belt, One Road (OBOR): China's Regional Integration Initiative.” European Parliamentary Research Service, July 2016. Date of Access: March 2, 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/586608/EPRS_BRI(2016)586608_EN.pdf.
34. Grosaru, Florin E. “The Strategic Importance ant the Actors of South-Eastern Europe.” Journal of Defense Resources Management 3, no 1 (4) (2012):101-112.
35. Gu, Hongfei. “Can Asymmetric Relationships Work Together? A Quantitative Approach of “16+1” Cooperation Mechanism.” Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 2019:188. Date of Access: February 10, 2023. https://dspace.uni.lodz.pl/xmlui/handle/11089/29297.
36. Heath, Ryan and Andrew Gray. “Beware Chinese Trojan horses in the Balkans, EU Warns.” POLITICO, July 27, 2018. Date of Access: January 29, 2023. https://www.politico.eu/article/johannes-hahn-beware-chinese-trojan-horses-in-the-balkans-eu-warns-enlargement-politico-podcast/.
37. Hudda, Nabil. “Interpreting the Rise of China: Realist and Liberalist Perspectives.” E-International Relations, ISSN 2053-8626, (2015):1-10. Date of Access: February 12, 2023. https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/54616.
38. Jaklič, Andreja and Marjan Svetličič. “China and Central and Eastern European Countries within ‘16+1’: Group or Bilateral Relations?.” Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 7, no 2 (2019):83-100.
39. Jakóbowski, Jakub and Marcin Kaczmarski. “China on Central-Eastern Europe: ‘16+1’ as Seen from Beijing.” OSW Commentary, no 166 (2015):1-8. Date of Access: January 24, 2023. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2015-04-14/china-central-eastern-europe-161-seen-beijing.
40. Káráskova, Ivana, Alicja Bachulska, Ágnes Szunomar, Stefan T. Vladisavlej, Una A. B. Čerenkova, Konstantinas Andrijauskas, Liisi Karindi, Andreea
41. Leonte and Nina Pejic, Filip Šebok. “Empty Shell No More: China’s Growing Footprint in Central and Eastern Europe.” China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe (CHOICE) Policy Paper, (2018):1-94. Date of Access: January 20, 2023. https://chinaobservers.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CHOICE_ Empty-shell-no-more.pdf.
42. Karásková, Ivana. “How China lost Central and Eastern Europe.” MERICS, April 22, 2022. Date of Access: March 5, 2023. https://www.merics.org/en/comment/how-china-lost-central-and-eastern-europe.
43. Karasková, Ivana. “When Will the Czech Republic Exit the 16+1?.” China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe, July 28, 2022. Date of Access: March 2, 2023. https://chinaobservers.eu/when-will-the-czech-republic-exit-the-161/.
44. Karlis, Thanasis and Dionyssios Polemis. “The Belt and Road Initiative. A Geopolitical Analysis.” IAME Conference Paper, Greece, Athens, June 25th -28th, 2019.
45. Kavalski, Emilian. “China’s 16+1 Is Dead? Long Live the 17+1.” The Diplomat, March 29, 2019. Date of Access: March 5, 2023. https://thediplomat.com/2019/03/chinas-161-is-dead-long-live-the-171/.
46. Khoo, Nicholas. China’s Foreign Policy since 1978: Return to Power. Cheltenham: Edward Elgan Publishing, 2020.
47. Klyman, Kevin. “The EU Joins Washington’s Campaign to Contain China.” April 27, 2023. Just Security, Date of Access: May 28, 2023, https://www.justsecurity.org/86185/the-eu-joins-washingtons-campaign-to-contain-china/.
48. Knezevic, Johan. “Serbia the First and Only Operator of Chinese Drones and Missiles in Europe.” IARI, January 31, 2023. Date of Access: August 10, 2023. https://iari.site/2023/01/31/serbia-the-first-and-only-operator-of-chinese-drones-and-missiles-in-europe/.
49. Kowalski, Bartosz. “China’s Foreign Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe: The “16+1” Format in the South–South Cooperation Perspective. Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 1, no 1 (2017):1-16.
50. Kučerová, Irah. “Geopolitics of Central Europe - A Historical View”, Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica 19, no 1 (2015):169-190.
51. Kuhrt, Natasha and Marcin Kaczmarski. “Why is China More Likely to Support Russia in the War in Ukraine Than in the Past?.” KCL, February 28, 2022. Date of Access: March 24, 2023. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ukraine-invasion-why-china-is-more-likely-to-support-russia-than-in-the-past.
52. Kuo, Mercy A. “Germany, and Central Europe: Leveraging Fault Lines.” THE DIPLOMAT, March 1, 2018. Date of Access: March 24, 2023. https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/china-germany-and-central-europe-leveraging-fault-lines/.
53. Lau, Stuart. “China Trying to Divide and Rule in Europe, EU Foreign Policy Chief Josep Borrell Says.” South China Morning Post, May 16, 2020. Date of Access: January 20, 2023. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/ article/3084684/china-trying-divide-and-rule-europe-eu-foreign-policy-chief.
54. Liya, Han and Li Chao. Prospects of the New German Government's China Policy, CIR 32, no 2 (2022):62-80.
55. Lo, Bobo. the Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing and the New Geopolitics. London: Chatham House, 2008.
56. Lo, Chi. “China’s Silk Road Strategy.” International Economy 29, no 4 (2015):54-71.
57. Lo, Kingling “Lithuania Quit 17+1 Because Access to Chinese Market did not Improve, Its Envoy Says.” South China Morning Post, June 1, 2022. Date of Access: February 28, 2023. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/ article/3135522/lithuania-quit-171-because-access-chinese-market-did-not.
58. Lu, Ding. “China’s “Two Centenary Goals”: Progress and Challenge.” East Asian Policy 8, no 2 (2016):79-93.
59. Lubina, Michał. “Three Boards: Security, Economy and the New Unknown. The Complicated Relationship between China and Central and Eastern Europe.” Nowa Polityka Wschodnia4, no 23 (2019):61-81.
60. Malik, Mustafa. “Globalization with Chinese Characteristics: A Case Study of OBOR and CPEC (2013-2020).” International Journal of Political Studies 7, no 2 (2021):59-75.
61. Matura, Tamás. “China–CEE Trade, Investment and Politics.” Europe-Asia Studies 71, no 3, (2019):1-20.
62. Matura, Tamás. “Editor’s Welcome and Some Introductory Remarks,” inside China and Central Europe: Success or Failure?, ed. Tamás Matura, 7-22. Budapest: Dialóg Campus, 2020.
63. Matura, Tamás. “Chinese Investment in Central and Eastern Europe A Reality Check.” A Research Report, the Central and Eastern European Center for Asian Studies, Research Report (2021):1-16. Date of Access: January 28, 2023. www.china-cee-investment.org.
64. Matura, Tamás. “The Belt and Road Initiative Depicted in Hungary and Slovakia.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia 7, no 2 (2018):174-89.
65. Matura. Tamás. “Trade, Investment and Politics between China and Central and Eastern Europe Economic Necessity or a Trojan Horse?.” PhD Thesis, Corvinus University of Budapest, 2020.
66. Mix, Derek E. “Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania: Background and U.S.-Baltic Relations: Summary.” Congressional Research Service, CRS Report-R46139, (2022):1-19. Date of Access: March 20, 2023. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R46139.pdf.
67. McCaleb, Agnieszka and Agnes Szunomar. “Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: An Institutional Perspective.” inside Chinese Investment in Europe: Corporate Strategies and Labor Relations, ed. Jan Drahokoupil, 121-40. Haecht: European Trade Union Institute, 2017.
68. McDonald, Scott D. “Introduction-Strategic Competition.” inside China's Global Influence: Perspectives and Recommendations, ed. Scott D.
69. McDonald and Michael C. Burgoyne, 5-37. Honolulu: Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, 2019.
70. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. “Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin's Regular Press Conference on February 10.” February 10, 2021. Date of Access: January 20, 2023. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202102/t20210210_9721141.html.
71. Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knoph, 1946.
72. Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Fifth Edition, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978. Musabelliu, Marsela. “China’s Belt and Road Initiative Extension to Central and Eastern European Countries - Sixteen Nations, Five Summits, Many Challenges.” Croatian International Relations Review 23, no 78 (2017):57-76.
73. Pavlićević, Dragan. “‘China Threat’ and ‘China Opportunity’: Politics of Dreams and Fears in China-Central and Eastern European Relations.” Journal of Contemporary China 27, no 113 (2018):688-702.
74. Paszak, Paweł. “Not only the Balkans – China enters the CEE infrastructure.” Warsaw Institute, 2020. Date of Access: February 15, 2023. https://warsawinstitute.org/not-only-the-balkans-china-enters-the-cee-infrastructure/.
75. Peña, Alejandra. “China's Assertive Foreign Policy Strategy. Insights from the 19th Party Congress.” Tempo Exterio18, no 36 (2018):39-53.
76. Pendrakowska, Patrycja. “Poland’s Perspective on the Belt and Road Initiative.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7, no 2 (2018):190-206.
77. Putten, Frans-Paul V. D. “Ports and Chinese political influence in Europe.” Clingendael Institute, 2019:9. Date of Access: February 15, 2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep21415.4.
78. Quadri, Lukman. “One Belt One Road: Should Nigeria Sieve the Chinese Benevolence, or Accept It as a Free Lunch.” AHBV 2, no (2020):43-77.
79. Rencz, Flora. “The BRI in Europe and the Budapest-Belgrade Railway Link.” Briefing Paper, no10 (2019):1-11. Date of Access: February 15, 2023. https://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/EIAS-Briefing-Paper-The-BRI-in-Europe-and-the-Budapest-Belgrade-Railway-Link-Final.pdf. Sabbaghian, Ali and Rajdeep Singh. “China-Central and Eastern Europe Cooperation and EU Response from the Perspective of the Regional Security
80. Complex Theory.” Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies| 5, no 4 (2021):731-69. Sali, Evangjelia. “16+1 Initiative in China-EU Relations: ‘Golden Opportunity’ or ‘Divide and Rule.’” China-CEE Institute, no 25 (2018):1-12. Date of Access: January 24, 2023, https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Work_paper-201825.pdf.
81. Schneeweiss, Zoe. “China Is Systemic Rival Threatening German Economy, Lindner Says.” Bloomberg, March 29, 2022. Date of Access: April 20, 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/china-is-systemic-rival-threatening-german-economy-lindner-says.
82. Secretariat for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. “Summit Documents.” Date of Access: January 24, 2023. www.china-ceec.org/eng/zywj/ldrhhcgwj/.
83. Secretariat for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. “The Bucharest Guidelines for Cooperation between
84. China and Central and Eastern European Countries.” Date of Access: January 25, 2023. www.china-ceec.org/eng/zywj/ldrhhcgwj/202112/t20211222_10474155.htm.
85. Song, Lilei and Dragan Pavlićević. “China’s Multilayered Multilateralism: A Case Study of China and Central and Eastern Europe Cooperation Framework.” Chinese Political Science Review 4, (2019):277.
86. Sørensen, Camilla T. N. “The Significance of Xi Jinping’s ‘Chinese Dream’ for Chinese Foreign Policy: From ‘Tao Guang Yang Hui’ to ‘Fen Fa You Wei.’” JCIR 3, no 1 (2015):53-73.
87. Szczudlik, Justyna. “Seven Years of the 16+1 An Assessment of China's "Multilateral Bilateralism" in Central Europe.” Asie.Visions, Ifri, no 107 (2019):1-36, Date of Access: May 23, 2023. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/szczudlik_161_2019.pdf.
88. Tianping, Kong. “16+1 Cooperation Framework: Genesis, Characteristics and Prospect.” Medjunarodni Problemi, (2015): 167-83. Date of Access: January 20, 2023. DOI: 10.2298/MEDJP1503167T.
89. Turcsány, Richard Q. “Central and Eastern Europe’s Courtship with China: Trojan Horse Within the EU?.” European Institute for Asian Studies, (2014):1-6. Date of Access: January 30, 2023. https://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/EU-Asia-at-a-glance-Richard-Turcsanyi-China-CEE.pdf.
90. Turcsányi, Richard Q. “China and the Frustrated Region: Central and Eastern Europe’s Repeating Troubles with Great Powers.” CHINA REPORT 56, no 1 (2020):60-77.
91. UniCredit. “Western Balkans: The Burden of China’s Lending to Governments.” Macro Researchi EEMEA Special Topic, (2021):5. Date of Access: May 30, 2029. https://www.research.unicredit.eu/DocsKey/emergingmarkets_docs_2021_179967.ashx?EXT=pdf&KEY=l6KjPzSYBBGzROuioxedUNdVqq1wFeRoBg8dvzn51cwxIFTj0Rbl4w==&T=1.
92. Womack, Brantly. “Asymmetry and China’s Tributary System.” The Chines Journal of International Politics 5, no 1 (2012):37-54.
93. Womack, Brantly. “Asymmetry Theory and China's Concept of Multipolarity.” Journal of Contemporary China 13, no 39 (2004): 351-366.
94. Wrage Cynthia and Jakob Kullik. “After Kuka-Germany’s Lessons Learned from Chinese Takeovers.” CHOICE, July 2021, 2022. Date of Access: March 24, 2023. https://chinaobservers.eu/after-kuka-germanys-lessons-learned-from-chinese-takeovers/.
95. Wu, Wendy. “Berlin Uneasy About Beijing’s Growing Clout in Eastern, Southern Europe.” SCMP, February 18, 2017. Date of Access: March 20, 2023. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2072046/berlin-uneasy-about-beijings-growing-clout-eastern.
96. Wu, Wendy. “Is China Using ‘Divide and Rule’ Tactics to Gain Influence in Europe?.” SCMP, March 1, 2018. Date of Access: September 19, 2022. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2135244/china-using-divide-and-rule-tactics-gain-influence.
97. Xing, Li and Fan Cungi. “By Defining China a ‘Systemic Rival’, the West may have other Thoughts.” May 8, 2022. Date of Access: March 15, 2023. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202205/1265100.shtml.
98. Vangeli, Anastas and Dragan Pavlićević. “Introduction: New Perspectives on China-Central and Eastern Europe Relations,” Asia Europe Journal 17, no 2 (2019):361-68.
99. Vangeli, Anastas. “Global China and Symbolic Power: The Case of 16 + 1 Cooperation.” Journal of Contemporary China 27, no 113 (2018):674-87.
100. Venne, François. “China’s Trojan Horse Canters Through Hungary.” CEPA, April 19, 2021. Date of Access: January 29, 2023. https://cepa.org/article/chinas-trojan-horse-canters-through-hungary/.
101. Viktor, Eszterhai. “The One Belt One Road from Germany’s Perspective.” GEOPOLITIKA, August 15, 2017. Date of Access: March 24, 2023. http://www.geopolitika.hu/en/2017/08/15/the-one-belt-one-road-from-germanys-perspective/.
102. Vuksanovic, Vuk. “Serbia’s Arms Deals Show It’s Tilting Away From Russia and Toward China.” Foreign Policy, May 11, 2022. Date of Access: August 10, 2023. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/05/11/serbias-arms-deals-show-its-tilting-away-from-russia-and-toward-china/.
103. Vulović, Marina. “The Berlin Process in the Western Balkans: Big Ideas, Difficult Implementation.” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, December 12, 2022. Date of Access: March 28, 2023. https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2022C70/.
104. Xuanzun, Liu. “Chinese Defense Minister Visits Europe to Boost Military Ties, ‘Future Joint Military Drills, Exchanges Likely’.” Global Times, March 25, 2021. Date of Access: August 15, 2023. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202103/1219500.shtml.
105. Yan, Xuetong. “From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no 2 (2014):153-84.
106. Zhou, Weifeng ve Mario Estaben. “Beyond Balancing: China’s Approach towards the Belt and Road Initiative.” inside China’s New Global Strategy: The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), ed. Suisheng Zhao. Roudledge: Oxon, 2020. 36-51.