Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

The EU and the US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: An Evaluation From Turkey’s Perspective

Year 2014, , 1 - 29, 01.05.2014
https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000198

Abstract

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership TTIP negotiations initiated between the EU and the US go far from constituting a mere free trade area for the parties. It provides a platform where they endeavor to redesign global trade norms and rules. Taking part in this process seems to be vital for Turkey which has profound relationship with the transatlantic world. In this context, a possible ‘deep and comprehensive’ trade agreement to develop partnership with the US can be instrumental for Turkey to adopt itself to the coming global trade agenda. After the Customs Union with the EU, the TTIP shall be a new challenging process for Turkey to transform its economy and to integrate itself into global environment. Turkey’s approach to the TTIP shall be decisive in order to achieve stability in its relations with the West and to refrain from new quests in different geographies

References

  • Abramowitz, M. ve E. Edelman, From Rhetoric to Reality: Reframing U.S. Turkey Policy, Bipartisan Policy Center, Ekim 2013.
  • Akman, M.S., ‘The European Union’s Trade Strategy and Its reflections on Turkey: An Evaluation From the Perspective of Free Trade Agreements’, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2010, 12(2), ss.17-45.
  • Akman, M.S., ‘Dynamics of the European Union’s Trade Strategy and Its Imperatives on Turkish Trade Policy: Prospects for a Functioning Customs Union’, iç. Belgin Akçay and Bahri Yılmaz (der.), Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: Political and Economic Challenges, Lexington Books: Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, 2013, ss.129-176.
  • Baldwin, R., 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules, WTO Staff Working Paper, ERSD-2011- 08, 2011.
  • Bhagwati, J., Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade, Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Aran B., Global partnership quests: New contentious dynamics in trade and prospects for Turkey in an age of TPP and TTIP, Turkey Policy Brief Series, IPLI, 2013.
  • Francois, J. vd., Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment, CEPR-Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2013.
  • Cooper W.H. vd, The US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implications, Congresional Research Service, Washington DC, Mart 2013.
  • ECORYS, Non-Tariff Mesaures in EU-US Trade and Investment-An Economic Analysis, 2009.
  • Erixon, F., Whither the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Policy Brief 18, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 2013.
  • Erixon F. ve M. Bauer, A Transatlantic Zero Agreement: Estimating the Gains from Transatlantic Free Trade in Goods, ECIPE Occasional Paper, No.4/2010.
  • Felbermayr, G. vd., Dimensions and Effects of a Transatlantic free Trade Agreement Between The EU and US, Ifo Institute, 2013.
  • Felbermayr, G., B. Heid ve S. Lehwald, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Who benefits from a trade deal?, Bertelsmann Stiftung-Global economic Dynamics, 2013.
  • Fontagne, L., J. Gourden ve J. Sebastien, Transatlantic Trade: Whither Paretnership, Which Economic Consequences?, CEPII Policy Brief, Eylül 2013.
  • Hamilton, D. ve J. Quinlan, The Transatlantic Economy 2013, Washington DC: Transatlantic Business Council and AmCham-EU, 2013.
  • Horn H., P. Mavroidis ve A. Sapir, Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements, Bruegel: Brussels, 2009.
  • Kirişçi, K., Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States, Brookings Turkey Project Paper, No.2, Eylül 2013, s.20.
  • Kotzios ve Liacouras (der.), EU-US Relations: Repairing the Transatlantic Rift, Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, 2006.
  • Langhammer, R., Why a Market Place Must Not Discriminate: The Case Against a US-EU Free Trade Agreement, Kiel Working Papers, No.1407, Mart 2008.
  • National Board of Trade/Sweden, Potential Effects from an EU-US Free Trade Agreement: Sweden in Focus, 2012.
  • Petri P.A. ve M.G. Plummer, Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications, Policy Brief PB12-16, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Haziran, 2012.
  • Schott, J. S. ve C. Climino, Crafting a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: What Can Be Done?, PIIE Policy Brief, PB 13-8 Mart ,2013. Williams B.R.
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative
  • Trade and Economic Analysis, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, 2013.
  • WTO, World Trade Report 2012: Trade and Public Policies: A Closer Look at Non-Tariff Measures in 21st Century, Temmuz, 2012.

AB-ABD Transatlantik Ticaret ve Yatırım Ortaklığı: Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2014, , 1 - 29, 01.05.2014
https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000198

Abstract

AB ve ABD arasında başlatılan Transatlantik Ticaret ve Yatırım Ortaklığı TTIP müzakereleri sadece taraflara geniş bir serbest ticaret alanı oluşturmanın ötesinde küresel ticaret norm ve kurallarını da yeniden belirlemeye çalışacakları bir platform sunmaktadır. Transatlantik dünyası ile derin ilişkiye sahip olan Türkiye’nin kendi üzerinde etki yapacak bu yapının bir şekilde içinde yer alması önemlidir. Bu bağlamda ABD ile ortaklığın gelişmesine yönelik muhtemel bir ticaret anlaşmasının ‘derin ve kapsamlı’ olması Türkiye’nin yeni küresel ticaret gündemine hazırlanmasında da katkı sağlayacaktır. TTIP, AB ile mevcut Gümrük Birliği sonrasında, Türk ekonomisinin yeniden dönüşümü ve küresel ekonomiye eklemlenmesi için yeni ve zorlu bir süreçtir. Türkiye’nin TTIP konusunda göstereceği tutum, Batı dünyası ile ilişkilerini daha istikrarlı bir zemine oturtmasına ve farklı coğrafyalarda alternatif arayışlara yönelmekten kaçınmasına da katkı sağlayacaktır

References

  • Abramowitz, M. ve E. Edelman, From Rhetoric to Reality: Reframing U.S. Turkey Policy, Bipartisan Policy Center, Ekim 2013.
  • Akman, M.S., ‘The European Union’s Trade Strategy and Its reflections on Turkey: An Evaluation From the Perspective of Free Trade Agreements’, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2010, 12(2), ss.17-45.
  • Akman, M.S., ‘Dynamics of the European Union’s Trade Strategy and Its Imperatives on Turkish Trade Policy: Prospects for a Functioning Customs Union’, iç. Belgin Akçay and Bahri Yılmaz (der.), Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: Political and Economic Challenges, Lexington Books: Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, 2013, ss.129-176.
  • Baldwin, R., 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules, WTO Staff Working Paper, ERSD-2011- 08, 2011.
  • Bhagwati, J., Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade, Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Aran B., Global partnership quests: New contentious dynamics in trade and prospects for Turkey in an age of TPP and TTIP, Turkey Policy Brief Series, IPLI, 2013.
  • Francois, J. vd., Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment, CEPR-Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2013.
  • Cooper W.H. vd, The US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implications, Congresional Research Service, Washington DC, Mart 2013.
  • ECORYS, Non-Tariff Mesaures in EU-US Trade and Investment-An Economic Analysis, 2009.
  • Erixon, F., Whither the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Policy Brief 18, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 2013.
  • Erixon F. ve M. Bauer, A Transatlantic Zero Agreement: Estimating the Gains from Transatlantic Free Trade in Goods, ECIPE Occasional Paper, No.4/2010.
  • Felbermayr, G. vd., Dimensions and Effects of a Transatlantic free Trade Agreement Between The EU and US, Ifo Institute, 2013.
  • Felbermayr, G., B. Heid ve S. Lehwald, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Who benefits from a trade deal?, Bertelsmann Stiftung-Global economic Dynamics, 2013.
  • Fontagne, L., J. Gourden ve J. Sebastien, Transatlantic Trade: Whither Paretnership, Which Economic Consequences?, CEPII Policy Brief, Eylül 2013.
  • Hamilton, D. ve J. Quinlan, The Transatlantic Economy 2013, Washington DC: Transatlantic Business Council and AmCham-EU, 2013.
  • Horn H., P. Mavroidis ve A. Sapir, Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements, Bruegel: Brussels, 2009.
  • Kirişçi, K., Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States, Brookings Turkey Project Paper, No.2, Eylül 2013, s.20.
  • Kotzios ve Liacouras (der.), EU-US Relations: Repairing the Transatlantic Rift, Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, 2006.
  • Langhammer, R., Why a Market Place Must Not Discriminate: The Case Against a US-EU Free Trade Agreement, Kiel Working Papers, No.1407, Mart 2008.
  • National Board of Trade/Sweden, Potential Effects from an EU-US Free Trade Agreement: Sweden in Focus, 2012.
  • Petri P.A. ve M.G. Plummer, Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications, Policy Brief PB12-16, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Haziran, 2012.
  • Schott, J. S. ve C. Climino, Crafting a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: What Can Be Done?, PIIE Policy Brief, PB 13-8 Mart ,2013. Williams B.R.
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative
  • Trade and Economic Analysis, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, 2013.
  • WTO, World Trade Report 2012: Trade and Public Policies: A Closer Look at Non-Tariff Measures in 21st Century, Temmuz, 2012.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics, Political Science
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

M. Sait Akman This is me

Publication Date May 1, 2014
Submission Date January 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014

Cite

Chicago Akman, M. Sait. “AB-ABD Transatlantik Ticaret Ve Yatırım Ortaklığı: Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 13, no. 1 (May 2014): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000198.