Research Article

CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY

Volume: 19 Number: 2 March 12, 2021
  • Zühal Ünalp-çepel
TR EN

CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the historical background and the recent developments concerning the Readmission Agreement and free visa negotiations between Turkey and the European Union through the official documents of Ministry for Foreign Affairs and the European Union. As a third view, the policies of Turkey and the EU will be critically assessed from the perspectives of the international governmental organizations and non-governmental actors, namely the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International through their regular reports. Within the scope of the analyses, it is aimed to discuss the critical arguments on political approaches and security policies of the European Union and Turkey on migration control and elaborate why both sides preferred to solve the migration crisis through regional, and specifically, bilateral instruments.

Keywords

References

  1. Bürgin, Alexander. “European Commission’s Agency meets Ankara’s Agenda: Why Turkey is Ready for a Readmission Agreement, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, no: 6, (2012): 883-899.
  2. Bürgin, Alexander and Derya Aşıkoğlu. “Turkey’s New Asylum Law: a Case of EU Influence”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies (2015): 1-15.
  3. Carrera, Sergio and Roberto Cortinovis. “The EU’s Role in Implementing the UN Global Impact on Refugees”, “CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, no 2018-04 (2019): 1-18.
  4. “CFSP Report on Our Priorities in 2018”, Council of the European Union, Brussels, 2018, Accessed November 20, 2019, http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10766-2018-INIT/en/pdf.
  5. “Çavuşoğlu: Geri Kabul Anlaşması’nı Askıya Aldık”, Deutsche Welle, July 22, 2019, Accessed November 20, 2019, https://www.dw.com/tr/%C3%A7avu%C5%9Fo%C4%9Flu-geri-kabulanla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1n%C4%B1-ask%C4%B1ya-ald%C4%B1k/a49699277.
  6. De Marcilly, Charles and Angéline Garde. “The EU-Turkey Agreement and Its Implications”, Fondation Robert Schuman Policy Paper, European Issues, no 396 (2016): 1-8.
  7. Directorate General of Migration Management Mission, Accessed November 20, 2019, https://en.goc.gov.tr/mission (Accessed on 27.01.2020).
  8. Ekşi, Nuray. “Readmission Agreement between the European Union and Turkey: A Chain of Mistakes”. In International Community and Refugees: Responsibilities, Possibilities, Human Rights and Violations, 143-183. İstanbul: Amnesty International Turkey Publications, 2016: 143-183.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Zühal Ünalp-çepel This is me
0000-0002-2057-5966
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 12, 2021

Submission Date

February 24, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 4, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 19 Number: 2

APA
Ünalp-çepel, Z. (2021). CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 19(2), 501-522. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.886943
AMA
1.Ünalp-çepel Z. CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY. ARES. 2021;19(2):501-522. doi:10.32450/aacd.886943
Chicago
Ünalp-çepel, Zühal. 2021. “CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 19 (2): 501-22. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.886943.
EndNote
Ünalp-çepel Z (March 1, 2021) CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 19 2 501–522.
IEEE
[1]Z. Ünalp-çepel, “CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY”, ARES, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 501–522, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.32450/aacd.886943.
ISNAD
Ünalp-çepel, Zühal. “CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 19/2 (March 1, 2021): 501-522. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.886943.
JAMA
1.Ünalp-çepel Z. CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY. ARES. 2021;19:501–522.
MLA
Ünalp-çepel, Zühal. “CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, Mar. 2021, pp. 501-22, doi:10.32450/aacd.886943.
Vancouver
1.Zühal Ünalp-çepel. CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY. ARES. 2021 Mar. 1;19(2):501-22. doi:10.32450/aacd.886943

Cited By

download?token=eyJ1aWQiOjI1NDU3NywiYXV0aF9yb2xlcyI6WyJST0xFX1VTRVIiXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiQ0NfQlktTkMtTkQuc3ZnLnBuZyIsInBhdGgiOiJkZjU5L2EyNWQvNzU4MC82OWJiZWI4MjhjYWUzMi4zNDkxMTUxMi5wbmciLCJleHAiOjE3NzM5MjY4MDIsIm5vbmNlIjoiMDEwZTk5NjgyMmNmNTZlODQ0ZjYwODJhMTcxMTYzNDgifQ.ePx0-ZNhBjidX-LT8gYjWJzKoegJg3_MJrefrBsVjC4


 

 

Ankara Review of European Studies (ARES) is licenced under the Creative Commons License of CC BY-NC-ND license.