Research Article

THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD

Volume: 20 August 13, 2021
  • Münevver Cebecı
TR EN

THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD

Abstract

This article aims to elucidate the implications of Brexit for the EU’s security and defence actorness. Building on Bretherton and Vogler’s conception of “global actorness”, it inquires first, into political and security implications, and, second, into defence implications. It argues that Brexit affects the EU’s security and defence actorness negatively in terms of its presence (its diplomatic weight and representation) whereas the impact on the Union’s defence capabilities might not be detrimental in the long run, despite the loss a Member State with significant military power.

Keywords

References

  1. Amies, Nick. “Asia Pacific region becomes main focus of US foreign policy”, Deutsche Welle, November 17, 2011. Accessed on April 23, 2019. https://www.dw.com/en/asia-pacific-region-becomes-main-focus-of-usforeign-policy/a-15522953.
  2. Angelini, Lorenzo. Brexit is an opportunity for EU defence policy”, EU Observer, July 8, 2016. Accessed on April 23, 2020, https://euobserver.com/opinion/134256
  3. Axe, David. “Commentary: What the U.S. should learn from Britain’s dying navy”, Reuters, 14 (October 2016). Accessed on August 30. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uk-military-navy-commentaryidUSKCN10L1AD.
  4. Bakker, Anne and Margriet Drent and Dick Zandee. “European defence: how to engage the UK after Brexit?”, Clingendael Report, 15 (July 2017). Accessed on May 19, 2019. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2017-07/Report_European_defence_after_Brexit.pdf.
  5. Biscop, Sven. “Brexit, Strategy, and the EU: Britain Takes Leave”, Egmont Papers 100, (2018), 10-11
  6. Biscop, Sven.“All or nothing? The EU Global Strategy and defence policy after the Brexit”, Contemporary Security Policy 37, no 3 (2016): 431–445
  7. Bretherton, Charlotte and John Vogler. “A Global Actor Past Its Peak?”, International Relations 27, no 3, 375–390.
  8. Bretherton, Charlotte and John Vogler. The European Union as a Global Actor, London and New York: Routledge, 1999.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Science

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Münevver Cebecı This is me
0000-0003-4205-8924
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 13, 2021

Submission Date

November 30, 2020

Acceptance Date

March 1, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 20

APA
Cebecı, M. (2021). THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 20, 291-324. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.979261
AMA
1.Cebecı M. THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD. ARES. 2021;20:291-324. doi:10.32450/aacd.979261
Chicago
Cebecı, Münevver. 2021. “THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 20 (August): 291-324. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.979261.
EndNote
Cebecı M (August 1, 2021) THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 20 291–324.
IEEE
[1]M. Cebecı, “THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD”, ARES, vol. 20, pp. 291–324, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.32450/aacd.979261.
ISNAD
Cebecı, Münevver. “THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 20 (August 1, 2021): 291-324. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.979261.
JAMA
1.Cebecı M. THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD. ARES. 2021;20:291–324.
MLA
Cebecı, Münevver. “THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol. 20, Aug. 2021, pp. 291-24, doi:10.32450/aacd.979261.
Vancouver
1.Münevver Cebecı. THE IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR THE EU’S SECURITY AND DEFENCE ACTORNESS IN THE WORLD. ARES. 2021 Aug. 1;20:291-324. doi:10.32450/aacd.979261

Cited By

download?token=eyJ1aWQiOjI1NDU3NywiYXV0aF9yb2xlcyI6WyJST0xFX1VTRVIiXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiQ0NfQlktTkMtTkQuc3ZnLnBuZyIsInBhdGgiOiJkZjU5L2EyNWQvNzU4MC82OWJiZWI4MjhjYWUzMi4zNDkxMTUxMi5wbmciLCJleHAiOjE3NzM5MjY4MDIsIm5vbmNlIjoiMDEwZTk5NjgyMmNmNTZlODQ0ZjYwODJhMTcxMTYzNDgifQ.ePx0-ZNhBjidX-LT8gYjWJzKoegJg3_MJrefrBsVjC4


 

 

Ankara Review of European Studies (ARES) is licenced under the Creative Commons License of CC BY-NC-ND license.