AB Savunma ve Güvenlik Alımlarında İhale Usulleri ve İhale Uygulamaları

Servet Alyanak

doi:10.1501/Avraras_0000000200

Conference Paper

Awarding Procedures and Bidding Implementations in Defence and Security Procurement

Year 2014, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 55 - 74, 01.05.2014

Servet Alyanak

https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000200

Abstract

In 2009, the European Union EU has introduced the EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive 2009/81/EC in order to foster the development of an EU defence equipment market by establishing a legal framework for cross-border defence procurement. This essay intends to emphasize that it is highly important to implement Directive 2009/81/EC fully and adequately in all Member States in order to create and liberalize a common defence market within the EU. It is certain that 2009/81/EC Directive constitutes a milestone in creating a common defence market by providing a framework for cross-border defence procurement in the EU. This paper seeks to analyse the most likely violated rules of the concerned Directive by the Member States. Accordingly, the main provisions of this Directive on contract award procedures will be explained and the other relevant provisions such as exclusion from the tendering process and offset implementations will be discussed

Keywords

Defence policy, harmonisation, competition and transparency in EU defence market, public procurement, bidding procedures, offset implementations

References

) Adrian BROWN “Grounds for failing to advertise a contract for a conveyor- belt system: a note on C-394/02 Commission v Greece”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2005(c), 5, NA111-113
) Adrian BROWN, “The exemption for contracts accompanied by special security measures: Case C-252/01 Commission v Belgium”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2004(c), 2, s. NA33-35.
) Aris Georgopoulos, “Commission’s Communication on the Results of the Consultation Process on European Defence Procurement”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2006, 15(4), s. NA119-127.
) Baudouin Heuninckx, “Security of supply and offsets in defence procurement: what's new in the EU?”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2014, 2, s. 33-49.
) Dimitri MARDAS ve Dimitri TRIANTAFYLLOU, “Criteria for qualitative selection in public procurement: a legal and economic analysis”, Public Procurement Law Review, 4, 1995, s.145-158.
) Martin TRYBUS “Procurement for the armed forces: balancing security and the internal market”, European Law Review, 2002, 6, s. 692-699.
) Martin Trybus, “The hidden Remedies Directive: review and remedies under the EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive”, Public Procurement Law Review, 4, 2013, s. 135-155.
) Sue ARROWSMITH, “Implementation of the new EC procurement directives and the Alcatel ruling in England and Wales and Northern Ireland: a review of the new legislation and guidance”, Public Procurement Law Review, 3, 2006, s.118.
) Peter BRAUN, “Selection of bidders and contract award criteria: the compatibility of practice in PFI procurement with European law”, Public Procurement Law Review, 1, 2001, s.2.
) Peter BRAUN, “The use of qualitative award criteria and the difference between award and qualification criteria: a note on T-4/01, Renco SpA v Council of the European Union”, Public Procurement Law Review, 5, NA116-119, 2003, s.NA118.
) Servet Alyanak, “Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Savunma ve Güvenlik Alımları”, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt.12, No.2, 2013, s.1-26. Kitap
) Sue ARROWSMİTH, The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2005, s. 126.
) Christopher BOVIS, EC Public Procurement: Case Law and Regulation, Newyork, Oxford University Press, 2006, s. 224.

AB Savunma ve Güvenlik Alımlarında İhale Usulleri ve İhale Uygulamaları

Year 2014, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 55 - 74, 01.05.2014

Servet Alyanak

https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000200

Abstract

2009 yılında, Avrupa Birliği AB , sınır-aşırı savunma alımlarıyla ilgili yasal bir çerçeve oluşturarak AB savunma ekipmanları piyasasının gelişmesine yardımcı olmak amacıyla 2009/81/AT sayılı savunma ve güvenlik alımlarıyla ilgili yönergeyi kabul etmiştir. Bu makale, AB içerisinde ortak bir savunma piyasasını oluşturmak ve serbestleştirmek için 2009/81/AT sayılı yönergenin tam ve yeterli bir şekilde bütün üye devletlerde uygulanmasını sağlamanın son derece önemli olduğunu vurgulamak amacını taşımaktadır. Şu husus açıktır ki 2009/81/AT sayılı yönerge, AB içerisinde sınır-aşırı savunma ihaleleri yönünden yasal bir çerçeve oluşturarak ortak bir savunma piyasası oluşumu yönünden bir kilometre taşıdır. Bu makale üye devletlerin söz konusu yönergenin ihlal edilmesi kuvvetle muhtemel olan kurallarının analiz edilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, yönergenin ihale usulleriyle ilgili temel hükümleri ve ihalede değerlendirme dışı bırakılma ile offset uygulamaları tartışılacaktır

Keywords

Savunma politikası, uyumlaştırma, AB savunma piyasasında uyumlaştırma, rekabet ve şeffaflık, kamu ihalesi, ihale usulleri, offset uygulamaları

References

) Adrian BROWN “Grounds for failing to advertise a contract for a conveyor- belt system: a note on C-394/02 Commission v Greece”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2005(c), 5, NA111-113
) Adrian BROWN, “The exemption for contracts accompanied by special security measures: Case C-252/01 Commission v Belgium”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2004(c), 2, s. NA33-35.
) Aris Georgopoulos, “Commission’s Communication on the Results of the Consultation Process on European Defence Procurement”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2006, 15(4), s. NA119-127.
) Baudouin Heuninckx, “Security of supply and offsets in defence procurement: what's new in the EU?”, Public Procurement Law Review, 2014, 2, s. 33-49.
) Dimitri MARDAS ve Dimitri TRIANTAFYLLOU, “Criteria for qualitative selection in public procurement: a legal and economic analysis”, Public Procurement Law Review, 4, 1995, s.145-158.
) Martin TRYBUS “Procurement for the armed forces: balancing security and the internal market”, European Law Review, 2002, 6, s. 692-699.
) Martin Trybus, “The hidden Remedies Directive: review and remedies under the EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive”, Public Procurement Law Review, 4, 2013, s. 135-155.
) Sue ARROWSMITH, “Implementation of the new EC procurement directives and the Alcatel ruling in England and Wales and Northern Ireland: a review of the new legislation and guidance”, Public Procurement Law Review, 3, 2006, s.118.
) Peter BRAUN, “Selection of bidders and contract award criteria: the compatibility of practice in PFI procurement with European law”, Public Procurement Law Review, 1, 2001, s.2.
) Peter BRAUN, “The use of qualitative award criteria and the difference between award and qualification criteria: a note on T-4/01, Renco SpA v Council of the European Union”, Public Procurement Law Review, 5, NA116-119, 2003, s.NA118.
) Servet Alyanak, “Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Savunma ve Güvenlik Alımları”, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt.12, No.2, 2013, s.1-26. Kitap
) Sue ARROWSMİTH, The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2005, s. 126.
) Christopher BOVIS, EC Public Procurement: Case Law and Regulation, Newyork, Oxford University Press, 2006, s. 224.

There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	Turkish
Subjects	Political Science
Journal Section	Research Article
Authors	Servet Alyanak This is me
Publication Date	May 1, 2014
Submission Date	January 1, 2014
Published in Issue	Year 2014 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

Chicago	Alyanak, Servet. “AB Savunma Ve Güvenlik Alımlarında İhale Usulleri Ve İhale Uygulamaları”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 13, no. 1 (May 2014): 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1501/Avraras_0000000200.