Abstract
Defining the limits of Europe has always been a contentious issue and the debate over its borders has become more and more heated since the latest enlargement wave of the EU eastwards and the beginning of accession talks with Turkey. The definition of Europe 's borders is still an open question shadowed by geographical and cultural cleavages and biases and there seems no cultural consensus across Europe on this critical issue. This essay analyzes the possible definitions of the borders of Europe by giving a particular reference to the problem of illegal immigration. In this respect the classical geographic and cultural definitions are discussed respectively and on this basis the author offers in the concluding section some policy solutions to the question of drawing the borderline of Europe in a way that enables the Union to engage in a wellworking relationship with its near abroad, manifest in the rejection of any idea of Fortress Europe and a welcoming immigration policy. In conclusion the essay finds the geographical definition much more applicable and practical in defining the limits of Europe at the expense of the cultural definition despite its some obvious shortcomings.
Abstract
Defining the limits of Europe has always been a contentious issue and the debate
over its borders has become more and more heated since the latest enlargement wave of
the EU eastwards and the beginning of accession talks with Turkey. The definition of
Europe 's borders is still an open question shadowed by geographical and cultural
cleavages and biases and there seems no cultural consensus across Europe on this
critical issue. This essay analyzes the possible definitions of the borders of Europe by
giving a particular reference to the problem of (illegal) immigration. In this respect the
classical geographic and cultural definitions are discussed respectively and on this
basis the author offers in the concluding section some policy solutions to the question of
drawing the borderline of Europe in a way that enables the Union to engage in a wellworking relationship with its near abroad, manifest in the rejection of any idea of
Fortress Europe and a welcoming immigration policy. In conclusion the essay finds the
geographical definition much more applicable and practical in defining the limits of
Europe at the expense of the cultural definition despite its some obvious shortcomings.
Keywords
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 1, 2007 |
| Submission Date | January 1, 2007 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2007 Volume: 6 Issue: 2 |
Ankara Review of European Studies (ARES) is licenced under the Creative Commons License of CC BY-NC-ND license.