Research Article

Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges

Volume: 1 Number: 1 January 15, 2021
EN

Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the classification performances of K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models in a dataset. For this purpose, the “mobile price forecast" dataset has been selected. It includes 20 different features of mobile phones such as battery power, Bluetooth function, memory capacity, screen size. The problem presented in the dataset is to determine the price range class before the mobile phones are released. Such a forecast will help companies that manufacture mobile devices to estimate the price of their mobile phones in a more convenient method to compete against their competitors in the market. In the implementation phase of the study, the KNN and DNN models were created in Python 3.6 with the Sklearn and Keras libraries. The classification performances of the models were determined using F-1 score, accuracy, recall and accuracy measurements. As a result of the study, validation data was classified with 92% accuracy using the trained DNN model. In addition, at another stage of the study, the price range for 1000 devices with different features was determined by using a test dataset that was not labeled, and the results produced by both models were compared.

Keywords

References

  1. Guo J., Wang X., "Image Classification Based on SURF and KNN", International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), Beijing, China, 2019.
  2. Öztürk A., Durak U., and Badıllı F., "Twitter Verilerinden Doğal Dil İşleme ve Makine Öğrenmesi ile Hastalık Tespiti", Konya Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol 8(4), pp. 839 - 852, 2020.
  3. Uğuz S., Oral O., and Çağlayan N., "PV Güç Santrallerinden Elde Edilecek Enerjinin Makine Öğrenmesi Metotları Kullanılarak Tahmin Edilmesi", Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi , vol 11(3), pp. 769-799, 2019.
  4. Manzak D., Çetinel G., and Manzak A., "Automated Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease using Deep Neural Network (DNN) by Random Forest Feature Elimination", The 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education , Toronto, Canada, 2019.
  5. Paltrinieri N., Comfort L., ve Reniers G., "Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment", Safety Science , vol 118, pp. 475-486, 2019.
  6. Maehashi K., and Shintani M., "Macroeconomic forecasting using factor models and machine learning: an application to Japan", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol 58, 2020.
  7. Pondhu L. N. and Kummari G., "Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Gender Classification", 2nd International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies , 2018.
  8. Aydoğan M. and Karci A., "Makine Öğrenmesi ve Transfer Öğrenme ile Türkçe Metin Sınıflandırma", International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing , Malatya, Turkey, 2019.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Artificial Intelligence

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 15, 2021

Submission Date

December 27, 2020

Acceptance Date

January 11, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 1 Number: 1

APA
Güvenç, E., Çetin, G., & Koçak, H. (2021). Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1), 19-28. https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX
AMA
1.Güvenç E, Çetin G, Koçak H. Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges. Adv. Artif. Intell. Res. 2021;1(1):19-28. https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX
Chicago
Güvenç, Ercüment, Gürcan Çetin, and Hilal Koçak. 2021. “Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges”. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research 1 (1): 19-28. https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX.
EndNote
Güvenç E, Çetin G, Koçak H (January 1, 2021) Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research 1 1 19–28.
IEEE
[1]E. Güvenç, G. Çetin, and H. Koçak, “Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges”, Adv. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–28, Jan. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX
ISNAD
Güvenç, Ercüment - Çetin, Gürcan - Koçak, Hilal. “Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges”. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research 1/1 (January 1, 2021): 19-28. https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX.
JAMA
1.Güvenç E, Çetin G, Koçak H. Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges. Adv. Artif. Intell. Res. 2021;1:19–28.
MLA
Güvenç, Ercüment, et al. “Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges”. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 19-28, https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX.
Vancouver
1.Ercüment Güvenç, Gürcan Çetin, Hilal Koçak. Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges. Adv. Artif. Intell. Res. [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 1;1(1):19-28. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA28YR73UX

88x31.png
Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research is an open access journal which means that the content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. All papers are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which allows users to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

Graphic design @ Özden Işıktaş