Abstract
Laiklik (Devlet ve dinin ayrılığı), Atatürk'ün esas olarak 1922-1935 yıllarında gerçekleştirdiği reformların sonucu ve nedenidir. Batı ülkelerinden farklı olarak bu ilke, yüzyıllar boyunca insanların büyük bölümleri arasında yayılan filozofların evrimsel akımları ve fikirleri tarafından değil, daha ziyade doğrudan ve kararlı eylem ve bürokratlardan oluşan oldukça küçük bir elitin devrimci coşkusu ile gerçekleştirilmişti. ve genç ordu subayları.
References
- For a detailed analysis of the subject Dr. Bülent Dâver, Türkiye Cumhuriyetinde Lâik¬lik (Secularism in Turkish Republic), Ankara, 1955
- Manfred, Halpern; The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and Africa, Princet- on University Press, 1963, p. 130 Majid Khadduri; “The Islamic System: Its Gompetition and Coexistence with Wes- tern Systems”, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 1954, p. 51 Walter F. Weiker; The Turkish Revolution: 1960-1961, The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C. 1965, pp. 8-9 See in this matter an article vvritten by Paul Stirling; “Religious Change in Republi- can Turkey”, Middle East Journal Autumn 1958, p. 400 David Hotham; “Turks Turn Again to Religion”, The Times, February 23, 1960 Frederic Frey; The Turkish Political Elite, Cambridge M.I.T. Press, 1965, p. 390 Article 163 of the Turkish Penal Code sanctions in detail the violation of this principle Robinson; The First Turkish Republic, p. 205. See also Lerner and Robinson; “Svvords and Plougshares”, World Politics, vol. XII, October 1966, pp. 19-22 Weiker, The Turkish Revolution 1960-1961, p. 4 Karpat; Turkey’s Politics, p. 288 Ergun Özbudun; The Role of Military in Recent Turkish Politics, p. 17 W.C. Smith; “Modern Türkiye Dinî Bir Reforma mı Gidiyor?” Ankara İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1953, sayı 1, sh. 13 Manfred Halpern, op. cit., p. 152.
Abstract
Secularism (separation of State and religion) is the result and the cause of Atatürk’s reforms carried out mainly in the years 1922-1935. This principle, unlike in western countries, had not been realized by the evolutionary currents and ideas of philosophers, disseminated among large parts of the people throughout the centuries, but rather by direct and resolute action and revolutionary enthusiasm of a considerably small elite composed of bureaucrats and young army offıcers.
Keywords
References
- For a detailed analysis of the subject Dr. Bülent Dâver, Türkiye Cumhuriyetinde Lâik¬lik (Secularism in Turkish Republic), Ankara, 1955
- Manfred, Halpern; The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and Africa, Princet- on University Press, 1963, p. 130 Majid Khadduri; “The Islamic System: Its Gompetition and Coexistence with Wes- tern Systems”, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 1954, p. 51 Walter F. Weiker; The Turkish Revolution: 1960-1961, The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C. 1965, pp. 8-9 See in this matter an article vvritten by Paul Stirling; “Religious Change in Republi- can Turkey”, Middle East Journal Autumn 1958, p. 400 David Hotham; “Turks Turn Again to Religion”, The Times, February 23, 1960 Frederic Frey; The Turkish Political Elite, Cambridge M.I.T. Press, 1965, p. 390 Article 163 of the Turkish Penal Code sanctions in detail the violation of this principle Robinson; The First Turkish Republic, p. 205. See also Lerner and Robinson; “Svvords and Plougshares”, World Politics, vol. XII, October 1966, pp. 19-22 Weiker, The Turkish Revolution 1960-1961, p. 4 Karpat; Turkey’s Politics, p. 288 Ergun Özbudun; The Role of Military in Recent Turkish Politics, p. 17 W.C. Smith; “Modern Türkiye Dinî Bir Reforma mı Gidiyor?” Ankara İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1953, sayı 1, sh. 13 Manfred Halpern, op. cit., p. 152.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 1, 1988 |
| Published in Issue | Year 1988 Volume: 4 Issue: 11 |