Heliopolis’ activities under flyovers: Qualitative data analysis of citizens’ interests

Abstract

The literature documents several urban agendas concerning urban sprawl, traffic transit sequences, and flyover bridges. Changes in development patterns in Egypt result in many lost spaces beneath flyover bridges, affecting the urban fabric. Despite these vacant spaces under the flyovers, the current Egyptian policies have transformed them into urban public areas. This paper analysed the development scheme of some regions under newly constructed bridges in Cairo. This paper reviews activities and landscape architecture under the flyovers and identifies their impact on the urban commons. The goal was to explore diverse and conflicting experiences based on age and types of neighbourhoods to determine the possibility of activities useful for the community and enhancing their quality of life. This research uses quantitative methods using maps and surveys of respondents who have experienced the current conditions under flyovers. The findings revealed how the development plans had shifted in relation to Heliopolis's worth. In constructing the bridges amidst the city's fabric, the findings highlighted the importance of linking the neighbourhood’s characteristics of urban configuration, landscape architecture, and socioeconomic parameters.

Keywords

• Residential Neighbourhood
• Aesthetic Quality
• Urban Public Space
• Cognition Process

References

1. Reference 1 Abusaada, H., & Elshater, A. (2020). Revealing distinguishing factors between Space and Place in urban design literature. Journal of Urban Design, 1-22.
2. Reference 2 Akbarpour, N., & Tabibian, M. (2015). Pedestrian-oriented approaches for improving lost spaces by using SWOT (case study: Seyedqandan overpass, Tehran). Universal Researchers in Science and Technology, 7.
3. Reference3 Alhowaily, A. (2015). Sustainable Urbanization in the Egyptian Desert, the case study Heliopolis. Technical University of Berlin.
4. Reference4 Baaj, M., El-Fadel, M., Shazbak, S., & Saliby, E. (2001). Modeling noise at elevated highways in urban areas: a practical application. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 169-180.
5. Reference5 Bauman, Z., & May, T. (2019). Thinking sociologically. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Reference6 Biesecker, C. (2015). Designing urban underhighway spaces. University of Georgia.
7. Carr, S. F. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
8. Certeau, M. J. (1988). The practice of everyday life.

9. Chohan, A. H. (2014). Infrastructure development and implication of negative spaces in city centers. GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology (JET).
10. Cravalho, N. (2015). Revitalization of" Dead Space" through the use of Interactive Interventions.
11. El Fayoumi, M. (2017). Street Vendors’ Roles in Main Squares Utilization as a Type of Tactical Urbanism Application in G.C.R. “A Criticism Review on Ramses Square”. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2017.
12. El-Hattab, M., Amany, S., & Lamia, G. (2018). Monitoring and assessment of urban heat islands over the Southern region of Cairo Governorate, Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 311-323.
13. Elkhateeb, M. (2020). The SUbMonitor - The Bridges are coming! How local planners continue to cut through the fabric of Cairo by building mega highways and flyovers through its neighborhoods. The SUbMonitor. Retrieved from https://thesubmonitor.com/post/619085882534887425/the-bridges-are-coming-how-local-planners
14. Elshater, A. (2014). Prosperity of thought versus retreat of application: A comprehensive approach in urban design teaching. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 45.
15. Elshater, A. (2014). Tactical urbanism: A method of community empowerment in Cairo neighborhoods. World Sustainable Buildings WSB14' Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions, Barcelona, 28-38.
16. Elshater, A. (2015). The Principles of Gestalt Laws and Everyday Urbanism: A Visual Tactic of City Potentialities. The International Journal of the Constructed Environment, 1-19.
17. Elshater, A. (2018). The Philosophy of Urban Reload. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 161-174.
18. Elshater, A., Abusaada, H., & Afifi, S. (2019). What makes livable cities of today alike? Revisiting the criterion of singularity through two case studies. Cities, 273-291.
19. Gardolinski, J., & Men, G. (2010). Heliopolis: City in a City. ETH Studio Basel Contemporary City Institute.
20. GOPP. (2008). Cairo from Below. Retrieved May 2021, from https://cairofrombelow.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/cairo-2050-vision-v-2009-gopp-12-mb.pdf
21. Kurniawati, W. (2012). Public space for marginal people. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 476-484.
22. Lavrinec, J. (2011). Revitalization of public space: From “non-places” to creative playgrounds. Coactivity: Philosophy, Communication/Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija, 19(2), 70-75.
23. Malterre-Barthes, C. (2011). The highway's shadow: Zurich's Hardbrücke. Infrastructural Urbanism: Addressing the In-between, 93-108.
24. Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities: A psychological analysis. Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association., Sep, 1969, Washington, DC, US; This paper is based on an Invited Address presented to the Division of General Psychology at the aforementioned meeting. American Psychological Association.
25. Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.sis.gov.eg/Story/68072?lang=en-us
26. Nowier, H. G. (2014). Separation and purification of palladium from aqueous solution by thiol derivatives. Arab J. of Nucl. Sci. and Applications, 53-60.
27. PPS. (2018). Placemaking -What if We Build Cities Around Places? Project for Public Spaces Inc. 1-24. Retrieved from www.pps.org.
28. Protocol, Montreal. (2018). Terms of Reference Egypt Fourth National Communication Project ( NC4-Egypt ) Preparing a Technical updated report on Economic Profile to Facilitate Development of National Framework of Cross Cutting Issues Chapter in National Communication. Climate Change. 1-8.
29. Ragab, A., Girgis, H., Zaki, H., Osman, M., Al-Khorazaty, N., & Hamed, R. (2016). Population Situation Analysis. New York: UNFPA. Retrieved from https://egypt.unfpa.org/en/publications/population-situation-analysis-egypt-2016-report
30. Samuel, P., & Poole, R. W. (2006). Innovative Roadway Design: Making Highways More Likable. Reason Foundation.
31. Stansfeld, S. A. (2003). Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. British medical bulletin, 243-257.
32. Thomas, D. (2016). Placemaking: An urban design methodology. Routledge.
33. Tiazzoldi, C., & Elshater, A. (2020). Combinatorial Architecture: Urban Causality, Creativity, and Socialisation. In H. Abusaada, A. Salama, & A. Elshater, Reconstructing Urban Ambiance in Smart Public PlacesReconstructing Urban Ambiance in Smart Public Places (pp. 199-220). Hershay: IGI Global.
34. Tischer, C., Gascon, M., Fernández-Somoano, A., Tardón, A., Materola, A. L., Ibarluzea, J., ... & Dadvand, P. (2017). Urban green and grey space in relation to respiratory health in children. European Respiratory Journal, 49(6).
35. Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
36. Walljasper, J. (2007). The great neighborhood book: A do-it-yourself guide to placemaking. New society publishers.
37. Wanas, A., & Amer, G. (2020). Thinking beyond structure: Flyover and bridge interventions on city urban aesthetics. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 1249-1267.
38. Whitzman, C., & Wekerle, G. (1997). Toronto Safer City Guidelines-2d Ed. Toronto: Community Services, Healthy City Office.
39. Whyte, W. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Conservation Foundation Washington, DC.
40. World Bank. (2018). Egypt: Enabling Private Investment and Commercial Financing in Infrastructure.