Dönüşümcü Okul Liderliği ile Öğretmen Öznel İyi Oluşu Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma, okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin öznel iyi oluş halleri arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modelinde desenlenmiştir. Araştırma verileri, Karabük ilinde 366 ilkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinden toplanmıştır. Verilerin toplanma sürecinde dönüşümcü liderlik ölçeği ve öğretmen öznel iyi oluş ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin öznel iyi oluş düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönde orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin öznel iyi oluş halleri arasında okul bağlılığı ve öğretim yeterliliği alt boyut düzeyinde pozitif yönde orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik alt boyutları ile öğretmen öznel iyi oluş hali alt boyutları arasında anlamlı pozitif yönde ve orta düzeyde bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu bulgular, öğretmenlerin okul yöneticilerini güvenilir ve motive edici olarak gördüğünü, yaratıcı düşünceyi teşvik ettiklerini ve bireysel ihtiyaçlara özen gösterdiklerini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bulgular, dönüşümcü liderliğin öğretmenlerin öznel iyi oluşunu artırdığı yönündeki literatürle örtüşmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dönüşümcü Liderlik
• Öğretmen İyi Olma Hali
• Okul Bağlılığı
• Öğretim Yeterliliği

Examining the Relationship Between Transformational School Leadership and Teacher Subjective Well-Being

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between school principals' transformational leadership behaviors and teachers' subjective well-being. The research is designed in a correlational survey model. The data were collected from 366 primary and secondary school teachers in the province of Karabük. During the data collection process, the transformational leadership scale and the teacher subjective well-being scale were used. The research findings revealed a moderately significant positive relationship between the transformational leadership behaviors of school principals and the subjective well-being levels of teachers. It was observed that there was a moderately significant positive relationship between the transformational leadership behaviors of school principals and teachers' subjective well-being at the sub-dimension levels of school commitment and instructional competence. A significant positive and moderate relationship was found between the sub-dimensions of transformational leadership and the sub-dimensions of teachers' subjective well-being. These findings suggest that teachers view school administrators as trustworthy and motivating, encouraging creative thinking, and showing care for individual needs. These findings are consistent with the literature, indicating that transformational leadership enhances teachers' subjective well-being.

Keywords

• Transformational Leadership
• Teacher Well-Being
• School Commitment
• Teaching Competency

References

1. Acton, R., & Glasgow, P. (2015). Teacher wellbeing in neoliberal contexts: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.6
2. Aggarwal, J., & Krishnan, V. R. (2013). Impact of transformational leadership on follower’s self-efficacy: Moderating role of follower’s impression management. Management and Labour Studies, 38(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X13513129
3. Akbolat, M., Işık, O., & Yılmaz, A. (2013). Dönüşümcü liderlik davranışının motivasyon ve duygusal bağlılığa etkisi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (11). 35-50. https://doi.org/10.18092/ijeas.54064
4. Allies, S. (2020). Supporting teacher wellbeing: a practical guide for primary teachers and school leaders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330698
5. Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29.
6. Antoniou, A. S., Polychroni, F., & Vlachakis, A. N. (2006). Gender and age differences in occupational stress and professional burnout between primary and high‐school teachers in Greece. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690213
7. Aslan, S., & Akyol, B. (2021). Ölçek uyarlama sürecinde madde sayısının azaltılmasının etkileri. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2), 85-102.
8. Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. (2011). Subjective well-being in organizations. K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (ss. 178–189). Oxford Library of Psychology, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0014

9. Balyer, A., & Özcan, K. (2012). Cultural adaptation of headmasters' transformational leadership scale and a study on teachers' perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 103-128.
10. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307-337. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass ve Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. The Free Press Google Schola, 2, 173-184.
11. Bass, B. M. (1997). Personal selling and transactional/transformational leadership. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17(3), 19-28.
12. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112-121.
13. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
14. Becker, E. S., Goetz, T., Morger, V. & Ranellucci, J. (2014). The importance of teachers’ emotions and instructional behavior for their students’ emotions— An experience sampling analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.05.002
15. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). The strategies for taking charge. Leaders, New York: Harper &Row.
16. Bilir, M. E. (2007). Öğretmen algılarına göre ilköğretim okul yöneticilerinin dönüşümcü liderlik özellikleri ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu ilişkisinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
17. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662-683.
18. Burke, R. J., Greenglass, E. R., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Predicting teacher burnout over time: Effects of work stress, social support, and self-doubts on burnout and its consequences. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 9(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809608249406
19. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
20. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (26.Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
21. Canbaz, F. (2019). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik özellikleri ile öğretmenlerin örgüte bağlılık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki (Bolu-merkez ortaöğretim örneği) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
22. Capone, V., & Petrillo, G. (2020). Mental health in teachers: Relationships with job satisfaction, efficacy beliefs, burnout and depression. Current Psychology, 39(5), 1757-1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9878-7
23. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
24. Celik, B., & Yildiz, Y. (2017). Commitment to the teaching profession. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i2sip93
25. Cenkseven-Onder, F., & Sâri, M. (2009). The quality of school life and burnout as predictors of subjective well-being among teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 1223-1235.
26. Cheng, Y. C. (1996). Relation between teachers' professionalism and job attitudes, educational outcomes, and organizational factors. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941322
27. Cropanzano, R. (2009). Writing nonempirical articles for Journal of Management: General thoughts and suggestions. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1304-1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309344118
28. Çelik, V. (1998). Eğitimde dönüşümcü liderlik. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 16(16), 423-442.
29. Çetin, A. (2019). An analysis of the relationship between teachers’ subjective wellbeing and their occupational resilience. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(3), 506-521. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.533847
30. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., & Brown, E. (2011). Successful school leadership: Linking with learning and achievement. McGraw-Hill Education.
31. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological İnquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
32. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542 -575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
33. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34 -43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
34. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-006-9007-x
35. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
36. Donaldson-Feilder, E., Munir, F., & Lewis, R. (2013). Leadership and employee well-being. In H. S. Leonard, R. Lewis, A. M. Freedman, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of leadership, change, and organizational development (ss. 155–173). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326404.ch8
37. Dost Tuzgöl, M. (2005). Öznel iyi oluş ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(23), 103-111.
38. Ergün, E., & Nartgün, Ş. S. (2017). Öğretmen öznel iyi oluş ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(2), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.296824
39. Friedman, I. A., & Farber, B. A. (1992). Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher burnout. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941824
40. Genç, N. ve Halis, M. (2006). Kalite liderliği. Timaş Yayınları.
41. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.
42. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980‐1995. School Effectiveness and School İmprovement, 9(2), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
43. Jalali, Z., & Heidari, A. (2016). The relationship between happiness, subjective well-being, creativity and job performance of primary school teachers in Ramhormoz city. International Education Studies, 9(6), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p45
44. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
45. Kahraman, G., & Arastaman, G. (2022). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderliği ile öğretmenlerin öznel iyi oluşları arasındaki ilişki: Korelasyonel bir çalışma. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 564-580. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1016859
46. Kâhya, S. (2020). Eğitim yöneticilerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışlarının öğretmen motivasyonuna etkisi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
47. Karakoç, F. Y., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Liderlik ölçeklerinde geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışmaları. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 130-145.
48. Kemer, Ö. & Yıldız, K. (2021). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin tükenmişlik algıları ile iş doyumları ve okuldan ayrılma niyetleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi, International Academic Social Resources Journal, 6(20),12-25.
49. Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197
50. Kök, S. B. (2006). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılığın incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 291-317.
51. Kuoppala, J., Lamminpää, A., Liira, J., & Vainio, H. (2008). Leadership, job well-being, and health effects—a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 50(8), 904-915. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817e918d
52. Kyriacou, C. (1987). Teacher stress and burnout: An international review. Educational Research, 29(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188870290207
53. Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628
54. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
55. Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, 1(2), 785-840.
56. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
57. Malik, S. Z., & Tariq, S. (2015). Relationship of transformational leadership, psychological well-being and self-efficacy: A mediation analysis in university faculty. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 11(2), 93-109.
58. McCallum, F. (2020). The changing nature of teachers’ work and its impact on wellbeing. M. A. White ve f. F. McCallum (Ed.) Critical perspectives on teaching, learning and leadership: Enhancing educational outcomes (ss.14-38). Springer, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6667-7
59. McCallum, F., & Price, D. (2010). Well teachers, well students. The Journal of Student Wellbeing, 4(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.21913/JSW.v4i1.599
60. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
61. Montano, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., & Hüffmeier, J. (2017). Leadership, followers' mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta‐analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of organizational behavior, 38(3), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2124
62. Nielsen, K., & Taris, T. W. (2019). Leading well: Challenges to researching leadership in occupational health psychology–and some ways forward. Work & Stress, 33(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1592263
63. Öztürk, A. (2015). Öğretmenlerin sahip oldukları yaşam amaçları ve sosyal desteğin öznel iyi oluş üzerindeki yordayıcı rolü. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2015(5), 338-347.
64. Piccolo, R. F., Bono, J. E., Heinitz, K., Rowold, J., Duehr, E., & Judge, T. A. (2012). The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most? The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.008
65. Polat, S., Taşcan, M., Ararat, Y. & Korkmaz, A. E. (2022). Covid-19 pandemi sürecinde okul yöneticisi ve öğretmenlerin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Social Education, 1(1).1-14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325966
66. Posner, B. Z.,& Kouzes, J. M. (1988). Development and validation of the leadership practices inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(2), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488482024 Reddy, G. L., ve Anuradha, R. V. (2013). Occupational stress of higher secondary teachers working in Vellore District. International Journal Of Educational Planning & Administration, 3(1), 9-24.
67. Renshaw, T. L., Long, A. C., & Cook, C. R. (2015). Assessing teachers’ positive psychological functioning at work: Development and validation of the teacher subjective wellbeing questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000112
68. Roffey, S. (2012). Pupil wellbeing—Teacher wellbeing: Two sides of the same coin? Educational and Child Psychology, 29(4), 8-17.
69. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
70. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
71. Sears, L. E., Agrawal, S., Sidney, J. A., Castle, P. H., Rula, E. Y., Coberley, C. R., Witters, D., Pope, J. E. & Harter, J. K. (2014). The well-being 5: development and validation of a diagnostic instrument to improve population well-being. Population Health Management, 17(6), 357-65. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2013.0119
72. Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
73. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
74. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038.
75. Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V., & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leaders' well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24(2), 107-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.495262
76. Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.5465/255721
77. Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School İmprovement, 26(4), 499-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106
78. Tarrasch, R., Berger, R., & Grossman, D. (2020). Mindfulness and compassion as key factors in improving teacher’s well being. Mindfulness, 11, 1049-1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01304-x
79. Tesfaw, T. A. (2014). The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The case of government secondary school teachers in Ethiopia. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(6), 903-918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214551948
80. Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. Training and Development Journal, 40(7), 27–32.
81. Tikenli, Ö., Emektar, Y., Çelik, A. N., Çelik, D., & Şahin, Z. (2024). Örgütsel depresyonun bir yordayıcısı: Örgütsel bağlılık. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(112), 1986-1997.
82. Uzun, Ü. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının öznel iyi oluş psikolojik sağlamlılık ve yaşam kalitesi arasındaki yordayıcı ilişkiler [Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
83. Van Dierendonck, D. (2004). The construct validity of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and İndividual Differences, 36(3), 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3
84. Viac, C., & Fraser, P. (2020). Teachers’ well-being: A framework for data collection and analysis. OECD Education Working Papers, No: 213. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
85. Vocke, D. E., & Foran, J. V. (2017). Why choose teaching? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2017.1299547
86. Yorulmaz, A., & Çelik, S. (2016). İlkokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel sinizm ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 161-193.
87. Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
88. Yüksel, H. İ. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin dönüşümcü liderlik özellikleri ile öğretmenlerin psikolojik sermayeleri arasındaki ilişki [Yüksek lisans tezi, Uşak Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
89. Zhang, L., Chen, J., Li, X., & Zhan, Y. (2024). A scope review of the teacher well-being research between 1968 and 2021. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(1), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00717-1