BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2013, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 65 - 82, 01.06.2013

Abstract

References

  • Abbott, F. F. (1911). A history and description of Roman political institutions, (3rd ed.). Boston: Ginn & Co..
  • Bauman, R. A. (1996). Crime and punishment in ancient Rome. London: Routledge.
  • Berger, A. (1953). Encyclopedic dictionary of Roman law. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. Brennan, T. C. (2000). The praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Buckland, W. W. (1911). Equity in Roman law. London: University Press.
  • Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. W., & Rawson, E. (1994). The Cambridge ancient history (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Çelebican, Ö. (2004). Roma hukuku: tarihi giriş-kaynaklar genel kavramlar- şahsın hukuku haklarınn korunması. Ankara: Yetkin.
  • Davidson, J. L. (1912). Problems of the Roman criminal law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Demircioğlu, Halil (1967-1968) “Roma devletinin eyalet sistemi,” AÜDTCFD, Vol. 5-6, No. 8-11: 443-459
  • Girard, P. F., & Lefroy, A. H. (19061905). A short history of Roman law. Toronto: Canada Law Book Co..
  • Ihne, W. (1853). Researches into the history of the Roman constitution with an appendix upon the Roman knights. London: William Pickering.
  • Kaser, M. (1968). Roman private law (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
  • Kunkel, W., & Kelly, J. M. (1966). An introduction to Roman legal and constitutional history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Levick, B. (1999). Tiberius the politician (Rev. ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Lintott, A. W. (1999). The constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford [England: Clarendon Press.
  • Loewenstein, K. (1973). The governance of Rome. The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Mackay, C. S. (2004). Ancient Rome: a military and political history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Plescia, Joseph. (2001) “Judicial accountability and immunity in Roman law,” The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 45, No. 1: 51-70.
  • Ramsay, W., & Lanciani, R. A. (1901). A manual of Roman antiquities (17th ed.). London: C. Griffin and Co..
  • Schulz, F. (1951). Classical Roman law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sohm, R., & Ledlie, J. C. (1892). The Institutes of Roman law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Umur, Z. (1975). Roma hukuku lügatı. Istanbul: Fakülteter Matbaası.
  • Umur, Z. (1979). Roma hukuku: tarihi giriş, kaynaklar, umumi mefhumlar, hakların himayesi. İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası

The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic

Year 2013, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 65 - 82, 01.06.2013

Abstract

However Roman State were based on monarchy when it was founded, the Romans needed transition to democracy regime and they preferred the Republic. Roman republic period had been the longest period in Roman political history. Roman government structure had been affected not only for the period of Republic but also in Principatus period. This situation shows us how the Roman government structure under the republic built on a steady foundation. In this period, structure of government changed and tree main bodies had been effective on government: Magistrate, The Senate and The Assembly. A complex constitution gradually developed, centered on the principles of a separation of powers and checks and balances and executive branch had been exercised by magistrates

References

  • Abbott, F. F. (1911). A history and description of Roman political institutions, (3rd ed.). Boston: Ginn & Co..
  • Bauman, R. A. (1996). Crime and punishment in ancient Rome. London: Routledge.
  • Berger, A. (1953). Encyclopedic dictionary of Roman law. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. Brennan, T. C. (2000). The praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Buckland, W. W. (1911). Equity in Roman law. London: University Press.
  • Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. W., & Rawson, E. (1994). The Cambridge ancient history (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Çelebican, Ö. (2004). Roma hukuku: tarihi giriş-kaynaklar genel kavramlar- şahsın hukuku haklarınn korunması. Ankara: Yetkin.
  • Davidson, J. L. (1912). Problems of the Roman criminal law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Demircioğlu, Halil (1967-1968) “Roma devletinin eyalet sistemi,” AÜDTCFD, Vol. 5-6, No. 8-11: 443-459
  • Girard, P. F., & Lefroy, A. H. (19061905). A short history of Roman law. Toronto: Canada Law Book Co..
  • Ihne, W. (1853). Researches into the history of the Roman constitution with an appendix upon the Roman knights. London: William Pickering.
  • Kaser, M. (1968). Roman private law (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
  • Kunkel, W., & Kelly, J. M. (1966). An introduction to Roman legal and constitutional history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Levick, B. (1999). Tiberius the politician (Rev. ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Lintott, A. W. (1999). The constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford [England: Clarendon Press.
  • Loewenstein, K. (1973). The governance of Rome. The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Mackay, C. S. (2004). Ancient Rome: a military and political history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Plescia, Joseph. (2001) “Judicial accountability and immunity in Roman law,” The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 45, No. 1: 51-70.
  • Ramsay, W., & Lanciani, R. A. (1901). A manual of Roman antiquities (17th ed.). London: C. Griffin and Co..
  • Schulz, F. (1951). Classical Roman law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sohm, R., & Ledlie, J. C. (1892). The Institutes of Roman law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Umur, Z. (1975). Roma hukuku lügatı. Istanbul: Fakülteter Matbaası.
  • Umur, Z. (1979). Roma hukuku: tarihi giriş, kaynaklar, umumi mefhumlar, hakların himayesi. İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ahmet Karakocalı This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karakocalı, A. (2013). The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic. Ankara Bar Review, 6(2), 65-82.
AMA Karakocalı A. The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic. Ankara Bar Review. June 2013;6(2):65-82.
Chicago Karakocalı, Ahmet. “The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic”. Ankara Bar Review 6, no. 2 (June 2013): 65-82.
EndNote Karakocalı A (June 1, 2013) The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic. Ankara Bar Review 6 2 65–82.
IEEE A. Karakocalı, “The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic”, Ankara Bar Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–82, 2013.
ISNAD Karakocalı, Ahmet. “The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic”. Ankara Bar Review 6/2 (June 2013), 65-82.
JAMA Karakocalı A. The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic. Ankara Bar Review. 2013;6:65–82.
MLA Karakocalı, Ahmet. “The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic”. Ankara Bar Review, vol. 6, no. 2, 2013, pp. 65-82.
Vancouver Karakocalı A. The Most Important Political Body of Roman Republic. Ankara Bar Review. 2013;6(2):65-82.