Development and life table parameters of the Phytoseius corniger Wainstein (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) under laboratory conditions

Abstract

Phytoseiid mites are important for biological control of some pest species including phytophagous mites and small insects. The species, Phytoseius corniger Wainstein is one of the most abundant predatory mite in fruit orchards and urban green spaces in Razavi Khorasan province, Iran. Biological parameters of this predatory feeding on the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch was studied for the first time under the laboratory conditions (25±2 ºC, 55±5 % RH and 16L: 8D photoperiod). The results indicated that the mean developmental periods for egg, larva, protonymph and deutonymph were 1.12±0.09, 0.73±0.03, 1.01±0.03, and 3.05±0.09 days for females, and 0.95±0.37, 0.67±0.39, 1.05±0.88, and 3.05±0.85 days for males, respectively. The pre-oviposition, oviposition, post-oviposition periods and adult longevity for females were 4.63±0.11, 11.63±0.16, 7.93±0.13 and 24.18±0.21 days, respectively. The females laid an average of 0.48 eggs per day, and 5.60 eggs during their life span. In addition, larvae of P. corniger may molt to the protonymph stage without feeding. Consumption rate during nymphal stage was 1.95 prey per day. The highest rate of prey consumption was recorded during the oviposition period, with an average of 3.35 prey items prey per day. Regarding life-history traits, the intrinsic rates of increase (rm) of this predatory mite 0.064±0.02 (♀♀/♀/day) and its finite rate of increase (λ), net reproduction rate (R0), generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) were 1.066±0.23 (day-1), 3±0.07 (♀♀/♀/generation), 17.14±0.11 (days), and 10.83±0.65 (days), respectively. Further laboratory and field studies regarding its diet preference and predation capacity are needed.

Keywords

• Demographic parameters
• predatory mite
• Phytoseius corniger

References

1. Al-Azzazy, M.M. and Alhewairini, S.S. 2020. Life table analysis to evaluate biological control of four mite species associated with olive trees using the predatory mite Phytoseius plumifer (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 57 (1): 299-305. doi: 10.21162/PAKJAS/20.9469
2. Birch, L.C. 1948. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 17 (1): 15-26. doi: 10.2307/1605
3. Chi, H. 1988. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rate among individuals. Environmental Entomology, 17 (1): 26-34. doi: 10.1093/ee/17.1.26
4. Chi, H. 2015. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis. National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan. Available from http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/prod02.htm (Last accessed: January 2023).
5. Chi, H. and Liu, H. 1985. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, 24 (2): 225-240.
6. Demite, P.R., Moraes, G.J. de, McMurtry, J.A., Denmark, H.A. and Castilho, R.C. 2023. Phytoseiidae Database. Available from www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae (Last accessed: January 2023).
7. Duso, C. and Vettorazo, E. 1999. Mite population dynamics on different grape varieties with or without phytoseiid released (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 23: 741-763. doi: 10.1023/A:1006297225577
8. Gorji, M.K., Fathipour, Y. and Kamali. K. 2012. Life table parameters of Phytoseius plumifer (Phytoseiidae) fed on two-spotted spider mite at different constant temperatures. International Journal of Acarology, 38 (5): 377-385. doi: 10.1080/01647954.2012.657239

9. Hajizadeh, J., Hosseini, R. and McMurtry, J.A. 2002. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) associated with eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophyidae) in Guilan province of Iran. International Journal of Acarology, 28 (4): 373-378. doi: 10.1080/01647950208684313
10. Huang, Y.B. and Chi, H. 2012. Life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): With an invalidation of the Jackknife technique. Journal of Applied Entomology, 173 (5): 327-339. doi: 10.1111/jen.12002
11. Khalequzzaman, M., Mondal, M., Fazlul Haque, M. and Sajedul Karim, M. 2007. Predatory efficacy of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the two spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Bio-Science, 15: 127-132. doi: 10.3329/jbs.v15i0.2152
12. Kazemi, S., Mohammad-Doustaresharaf, M. and Döker, I. 2022. An annotated checklist of the Iranian Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata), with an updated key to the species. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 27(4): 697-748. doi: 10.11158/saa.27.4.6
13. Khodayari, S., Fathipour, Y. and Kamali, K. 2013. Life history parameters of Phytoseius plumifer (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on corn pollen. Acarologia, 53 (2): 185-189. doi: 10.1051/acarologia/20132087
14. Knapp, M., van Houten, Y., van Baal, E. and Groot, T. 2018. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarologia, 58 (Suppl.): 72-82. doi: 10.24349/acarologia/20184275
15. McMurtry, J.A. and Croft, B.A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology, 42: 291-321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.291
16. McMurtry, J.A., de Moraes, G.J. and Sourassou, N.F. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 18 (4): 297-320. doi: 10.11158/saa.18.4.1
17. Meyer, J.S., Ingersoll, C.G., McDonald, L.L. and Boyce, M.S. 1986. Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates: Jackknife vs. Bootstrap techniques. Ecology, 67 (5): 1156-1166. doi: 10.2307/1938671
18. Nadimi, A., Kamali, K., Arbabi, M. and Abdoli, F. 2009. Selectivity of three miticides to spider mite predator, Phytoseiulus plumifer (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions. Agricultural Sciences in China, 8: 226-231. doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60216-3
19. Naher, N., Islam, W. and Haque, M.M. 2005. Predation of three predators on two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Life and Earth Science, 1 (1): 1-4.
20. Namaghi, H.S. 2010. Mites (Acari: Prostigmata & Mesostigmata) inhabiting green plantings in urban environment of north-eastern Iran, including six new records. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 5 (1): 123-130.
21. Panahi Laeen, H., Askarianzadeh, A. and Jalaeian, M. 2014. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of fruit orchards in cold regions of Razavi Khorasan province (northeast Iran), with redescription of two species. Persian Journal of Acarology, 3 (1): 27-40. doi: 10.22073/pja.v3i1.10127
22. Pappas, M.L., Xhantis, C., Samaras, K., Koveos, D.S. and Broufas, G.D. 2013. Potential of the predatory mite Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to feed and reproduce on greenhouse pests. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 61: 387-401. doi: 10.1007/s 10493-013-9711-9
23. Rasmy, A. H., Abdel-Rahman, H.A. and Hussein, H.E. 1991. Suitability of different mite prey for the development of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 11: 89-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01193732
24. Vassiliou, V.A., Kitsis, P.C. and Papadoulis, G.Th. 2012. New record of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Cyprus. International Journal of Acarology, 38: 191-198. doi: 10.1080/01647954.2011.603357