Research Article

Evaluation Of Urological Emergency Cases Admitted To Emergency Department

Volume: 7 Number: 3 December 26, 2022
EN TR

Evaluation Of Urological Emergency Cases Admitted To Emergency Department

Abstract

Aim: Especially in recent years, with the increase in the number of patients admitted to the emergency services the number of urological emergencies is increasing. Some of these require immediate attention. There are not enough studies on urological emergencies in our country. In this study, we aimed to investigate the demographic data of patients over the age of 18 who presented to the emergency department with non-traumatic urological emergency complaints. Materials and Methods: This study was designed based on a 6-month prospective, cross-sectional study. After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee, patients over the age of 18 with urological emergency complaints were examined between 06.11.2019 and 06.05.2020. Results: The ratio of urological emergencies to all patients was found to be 1.5%. 56.76% (n: 231) of the patients were male and 43.24% (n = 176) were female. In the study was found 44.7% of the patients to be urinary tract infection, 31.45% renal colic, 8.8% hematuria, 6.88% acute urinary retention. In our study, urology consultation was requested for 19% of urological emergency patients. Emergency intervention was applied to 21.13% of all urological emergency cases. Emergency operation was required for 1.47% of the patients. 10.81% of the patients required hospitalization. Conclusion: As a result, urological emergencies are common. Among these cases, there may be diseases that require urgent intervention or surgery. It is very important for the patients the emergency physicians who evaluate the patient first to make a careful and meticulous evaluation and to make a urology consultation if necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. 1- Akıncı H. Karabük Devlet Hastanesi'ne Başvuran Ürolojik Acil Olguların Analizi. Uludağ Tıp Derg. 2009; 35(1): 17-20.
  2. 2- Kafkaslı A, Selimoğlu A, Boz MY, Yazıcı Ö, Akif T, Hamarat MB, et al. Ürolojik acil olguların analizi: Tek merkezli çalışma. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi.9(3):10-3.
  3. 3- Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Dec;7(12):653-60. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.190. PMID: 21139641.
  4. 4- Cowan NC. CT urography for hematuria. Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Mar 13;9(4):218-26. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.32. PMID: 22410682.
  5. 5- Kamel, A., Mahmoud, M., Zaky, K., Alsayed, M., Alsharkawey, A. (2020). Role of CT For Evaluation of Hematuria. SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences, 3(2), 79-86. doi: 10.21608/svuijm.2020.111987
  6. 6- Vedula R, Iyengar AA. Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Hematuria. Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;87(8):618-624. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03184-4. Epub 2020 Feb 6. PMID: 32026313.
  7. 7- Fontanarosa PB, Roush WR. Acute urinary retention. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1988 Aug;6(3):419-37. PMID: 3292220.
  8. 8- Thomas K, Chow K, Kirby RS. Acute urinary retention: a review of the aetiology and management. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7(1):32-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500700. PMID: 14999235.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 26, 2022

Submission Date

December 16, 2022

Acceptance Date

December 24, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 3

Vancouver
1.Mehmet Gün, Fatih Çakmak, İbrahim İkizceli, Seda Özkan, Afsin İpekci, Serap Biberoğlu, Yonca Senem Akdeniz. Evaluation Of Urological Emergency Cases Admitted To Emergency Department. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2022 Dec. 1;7(3):77-81. doi:10.25000/acem.1219948