Research Article

Evaluation of perianal fistulas with magnetic resonance imaging: Significance of T2-weighted BLADE sequence in disease diagnosis

Volume: 6 Number: 1 March 30, 2021
EN TR

Evaluation of perianal fistulas with magnetic resonance imaging: Significance of T2-weighted BLADE sequence in disease diagnosis

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomical details of perianal fistulas can be revealed more clearly by T2-weighted (T2-W) periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (BLADE)sequence during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the T2-W BLADE sequence and the T2-W turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence in diagnosing perianal fistula, as well as to compare the findings with the results obtained using the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-weighted (T1-W) sequence during routine pelvic MRI examination. Methods: Ninety patients (M/F: 67/23) who had undergone pelvic MRI examination (1.5Tesla) for the prediagnosis of perianal fistula were included in this prospective study. In addition to our routine pelvic MRI protocol, T2-W BLADE sequence imaging and T2-W TSE sequence imaging in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes were performed. Using a three-stage scoring system, two radiologists independently compared the T2-W BLADE and T2-W TSE sequences with each other and then with the DCE T1-W sequence in terms of perianal fistula imaging. Statistical analysis was performed using a sample t-test and the Cronbach’s α test. Results: Compared with the T2-W TSE sequence, the T2-W BLADE sequence was associated with fewer ghosting artifacts, higher overall image quality, and with clearer visualization of the anatomical details of the perianal fistula (p < 0.05). Images with high anatomic details and contrast resolution were obtained using the T2-W BLADE sequence similar to those obtained using the DCE T1-W sequence (p < 0.05). Conclusion: On the basis of the reduced imaging time and on the higher image resolution, T2-W images can be obtained with the BLADE technique for the diagnosis of perianal fistula.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

yok

Thanks

teşekkür ederim

References

  1. Erden A. MRI of the anal canal: normal anatomy, imaging protocol, and perianal fistulas: part 1. Abdom Radiol 2018;43:1334-1352.
  2. De Miguel C J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF et al.MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas : spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 2012;32:175-194.
  3. Choudhary J, Kaushal L, Rajput P. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Perianal Fistula. Int J Sci Stud 2020;8:90-94.
  4. Visscher AP, Felt-Bersama RJ. Endoanal ultrasound in perianal fistulae and abscesses. Ultrasound Q 2015;31:130-137.
  5. Zand KR, Reinhold C, Haider MA et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the pelvis; J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26:480-497.
  6. Keogan MT, Edelman RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220:310-320.
  7. Pandit P, Qi Y, King KF et al. Reduction of artifacts in T2 -weighted PROPELLER in high-field preclinical imaging.Magn Reson Med 2011;65:538-543.
  8. Hirokawa Y, Isoda H, Maetani YS et al. Evaluation of motion correction effect and image quality with the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) (BLADE) and parallel imaging acquisition technique in the upper abdomen. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:957–962.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

​Internal Diseases

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 30, 2021

Submission Date

February 18, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 22, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 6 Number: 1

Vancouver
1.Safiye Sanem Dereli Bulut, Zakir Sakcı. Evaluation of perianal fistulas with magnetic resonance imaging: Significance of T2-weighted BLADE sequence in disease diagnosis. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2021 Mar. 1;6(1):27-31. doi:10.25000/acem.882429