Recess mi?, Lenfadenopati mi?; Sağ Alt Paratrakeal Alandaki Bu Karışıklılığı Gidermede Dinamik Difüzyon Manyetik Rezonans Görüntülemenin Yeri

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmamızda toraks bilgisayarlı tomografide alt paratrakeal lenfadenopati olarak yorumlanarak gereksiz işlemler uygulanan reseslerin toraks dinamik difüzyon manyetik rezonans (MR) ile doğruluğunu teyit etmeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Hastanemizde Mart 2016-Şubat 2017 tarihleri arasında toraks dinamik MR ve toraks BT çekilen 211 hasta çalışmamıza dahil edildi. Hastaların dinamik MR ve toraks BT görüntüleri iki farklı radyoloji uzmanı tarafınca değerlendirilip sonuçları yorumlandı. Bulgular: Dinamik MR değerlendirme sonucunda 118 hastada superior perikardiyal boşluk (HSPR) gözlendi. Bu hastaların 98’inde (%83,1) BT’de bu oluşun HSPR lehine değerlendirilmesine rağmen 20’sinde (%16,9) sağ alt paratrakeal LAP olarak yorumlandı. Her iki incelemede de HSPR olarak yorumlanan alanın en geniş çaplarının ortalamalarının değerlendirmesinde dinamik MR’da 13,9±8,7 mm iken BT’de 12,1±6,7 olarak gözlendi. İki radyolojik değerlendirme arasında ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklılık gözlendi (P=,04). Toraks dinamik MR’da HSPR olarak değerlendirilen toraks BT’de HSPR ve sağ alt paratrakeal LAP olarak yorumlanan lezyonların ortalama çaplarının karşılaştırmasında ise sağ alt paratrakeal LAP olarak yorumlanan lezyonların istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu gözlendi (P=,03). Sonuç: Dinamik MR; özellikle yanlışlık ile sağ alt paratrakeal LAP olarak değerlendirilerek akciğer kanseri evrelendirilmesi başta olmak üzere, gereksiz tanısal işlem ve uzun süreli takiplerin önüne geçmede toraks BT’ye nazaran daha etkili olabilir.

Keywords

• Bilgisayarlı tomografi
• difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme
• superior perikardiyal boşluk

Ethical Statement

Etik kurul onayı Atatürk Üniversitesi Yerel Etik Kurulu’ndan (Tarih: 26 Aralık 2025, No: B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00) alınmıştır.

Recess or Lymphadenopathy? Role of Dynamic Diffusion MRI in Differentiating Right Lower Paratracheal Lesions

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the identification of recesses that were interpreted as lower paratracheal LAP on thoracic CT, resulting in unnecessary procedures. Methods: This study included 211 patients who underwent dynamic thoracic MR and CT at our hospital between March 2016 and February 2017. Results: High-riding superior pericardial recess (HSPR) was observed on dynamic MRI in 118 patients. On CT, this structure was interpreted as the HSPR in 98 (83.1%) of these patients and as the lower right paratracheal LAP in 20 patients (16.9%). The mean largest diameter of the areas interpreted as HSPR in both modalities was 13.9±8.7 mm on dynamic MR images and 12.1 ± 6.7 mm on CT images. This difference was statistically significant (P=.04). Areas interpreted as HSPR on dynamic MRI and lower right paratracheal LAP on CT were significantly larger than those interpreted as lower right paratracheal LAP in both modalities (P=.03). Conclusion: Compared with thoracic CT, dynamic MRI may be more effective for lung cancer staging and preventing unnecessary diagnostic procedures and long-term follow-up because of misinterpretation of the pericardial recess as a lower right paratracheal LAP.

Keywords

• Computed tomography
• diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
• high-riding superior pericardial recess

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was obtained from Atatürk University Local Ethics Committee (Date: December 26, 2025, Number: B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00)

References

1. 1. Yasufuku K, Chiyo M, Sekine Y, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Chest. 2004;126(1):122-128.
2. 2. Carter BW. Modern imaging of the mediastinum. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(2):xiii.
3. 3. Choi YW, McAdams HP, Jeon SC, Seo HS, Hahm CK. The “high-riding” superior pericardial recess: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(4):1025-1028.
4. 4. Basile A, Bisceglie P, Giulietti G, et al. Prevalence of “high-riding” superior pericardial recesses on thin-section 16-MDCT scans. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59(2):265-269.
5. 5. Salyer D, Salyer W, Eggleston J. Benign developmental cysts of the mediastinum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1977;101(3):136.
6. 6. Kutlay H, İnası Yavuzer Ş, Han S, Cangir AK. Atypically located pericardial cysts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(6):2137-2139.
7. 7. Sabri YY, Mahmoud NMM, Abd El-Mageed MR, et al. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in sarcoidosis: can diffusion MRI play a role in its evaluation? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2023;54(1):60.
8. 8. McMurdo K, Webb W, von Schulthess G, Gamsu G. Magnetic resonance imaging of the superior pericardial recesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(5):985-988.

9. 9. Black C, Hedges L, Javitt M. The superior pericardial sinus: normal appearance on gradient-echo MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(4):749-751.
10. 10. Larsen S, Krasnik M, Vilmann P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy of mediastinal lesions has a major impact on patient management. Thorax. 2002;57(2):98-103.
11. 11. Annema J, Hoekstra O, Smit E, Veselic M, Versteegh M, Rabe K. Towards a minimally invasive staging strategy in NSCLC: analysis of PET positive mediastinal lesions by EUS-FNA. Lung Cancer. 2004;44(1):53-60.
12. 12. Gupta N, Gill H, Graeber G, Bishop H, Hurst J, Stephens T. Dynamic positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant lung/mediastinal lesions. Chest. 1998;114(4):1105-1111.
13. 13. Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Vilmann P, Krasnik M, Ernst A. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes. Thorax. 2006;61(9):795-798.
14. 14. Ernst A, Anantham D, Eberhardt R, Krasnik M, Herth FJ. Diagnosis of mediastinal adenopathy—real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided needle aspiration versus mediastinoscopy. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(6):577-582.
15. 15. Ge X, Guan W, Han F, Guo X, Jin Z. Comparison of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and video-assisted mediastinoscopy for mediastinal staging of lung cancer. Lung. 2015;193(5):757-766.
16. 16. Grillo HC. Management of cervical and mediastinal lesions of the trachea. JAMA. 1966;197(13):1085-1090.
17. 17. Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, Fujiwara T, et al. Role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the management of lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56(6):268-276.
18. 18. Ferreira HDP, Strange TA, Ahuja J, Patel S, Truong MT. Pericardial recesses on thoracic imaging. Clin Chest Med. 2024;45(2):237-248.
19. 19. Kuperberg SJ, Shostak E. High-riding superior pericardial recess. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019;26(1):71-73.
20. 20. Ferreira HDP, Erasmus LT, Strange TA, et al. Pericardial recesses on computed tomography: implications for the pulmonologist. Clin Chest Med. 2024;45(2):237-248.