Research Article

A New Diagnostic Biomarker for Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Endocan Level

Number: Advanced Online Publication Early Pub Date: April 16, 2026
EN TR

A New Diagnostic Biomarker for Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Endocan Level

Abstract

Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease affecting the human central nervous system. Many molecules are involved in its pathophysiology and help determine prognosis. The goal of this study was to determine serum endocan levels in patients with inactive MS. Methods: A total of 96 participants were included in the study; 48 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (mean age: 37.46±12.53, 20 men/28 women) and 48 controls (mean age: 38.22±18.57, 22 men/26 women). After the samples were thawed under appropriate conditions, serum endocan levels were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The relationship between endocan levels and the Expanded Disability Status Scale, demographic characteristics and medications were analyzed. Results: The endocan concentration was 371.04±67.39 ng/l in patients with MS and 1003.78±110.63 ng/l in the controls. Patients with MS had significantly lower levels of endocan than the controls did (P=.003). Endokan had the lowest diagnostic value (AUC=0.67, (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) as the cut-off value (229.50), sensitivity (63.04%) and specifity (39.13%) in the MS group. In this study, no significant differences were detected between Endocan and the other clinical parameters. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, compared withthose in healthy patients, endocan levels in MS patients were lower. It was concluded that the edokan level can be used as a biomarker in MS patients.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler. 2020;26:1816-1821.
  2. 2. Lassmann H, Brück W, Lucchinetti CF. The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: an overview. Brain Pathol. 2007;17:210-218.
  3. 3. Baecher-Allan C, Kaskow BJ, Weiner HL. Multiple sclerosis: mechanisms and immunotherapy. Neuron. 2018;97:742-768.
  4. 4. Kaisey M, Solomon AJ, Luu M, Giesser BS, Sicotte NL. Incidence of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in referrals to two academic centers. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;30:51-56.
  5. 5. Kelly SB, Chaila E, Kinsella K, et al. Multiple sclerosis, from referral to confirmed diagnosis: an audit of clinical practice. Mult Scler. 2011;17:1017-1021.
  6. 6. Dendrou CA, Fugger L, Friese MA. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:545-558.
  7. 7. Nylander A, Hafler DA. Multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:1180-1188.
  8. 8. Göbel K, Ruck T, Meuth SG. Cytokine signaling in multiple sclerosis: lost in translation. Mult Scler. 2018;24:432-439.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

April 16, 2026

Publication Date

-

Submission Date

February 25, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 8, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: Advanced Online Publication

AMA
1.Demirdöğen F, Bilge N, Odabaş FÖ, et al. A New Diagnostic Biomarker for Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Endocan Level. ACMES. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication). https://izlik.org/JA94CA95BT

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License