Evaluation of telemedicine and health tourism awareness of healthcare professionals
Abstract
Although electronic infrastructures save time and service effort in delivering health services, we need more information about regional service providers' attitudes and deficiencies towards these technologies. Therefore, in our study, we wanted to evaluate the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the use of electronic infrastructure in health tourism and their awareness of the use of telemedicine in general service delivery. For this purpose, a cross-sectional study was conducted among 108 healthcare professionals, and the data obtained from the survey was analyzed. According to our results, the preference for post-examination checks and the use of electronic infrastructures in health tourism are affected by gender and education. As healthcare professionals age, their knowledge of telemedicine increases, but their preference for using technology-based infrastructure or technological devices decreases. Our implications include eliminating deficiencies in health policies by effectively matching local needs and global expectations, especially health tourism and electronic health service provision.
Keywords
Healthcare Education, Medical Tourism, Telemedicine
Ethical Statement
The study was initiated with the permission of Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee numbered 25.53.2023/12, and the decision numbered 28.07.2023/55 of Mersin Provincial Directorate of Health. Researchers declare that relevant guidelines and regulations performed all methods, and that informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
References
- Zhong L, Deng B, Morrison AM, Coca-Stefaniak JA, Yang L. Medical, health and wellness tourism research-a review of the literature (1970-2020) and research agenda. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10875.
- Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, Health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(7):645-9.
- Roman M, Roman M, Wojcieszak-Zbierska M. health tourism-subject of scientific research: A literature review and cluster analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;20(1):480
- Jiang L, Wu H, Song Y. Diversified demand for health tourism matters: From a perspective of the intra-industry trade. Soc Sci Med. 2022;293:114630.
- Bashshur RL. On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed J. 1995;1(1):19-30.
- Alajlani M, Clarke M. Effect of culture on acceptance of telemedicine in Middle Eastern countries: case study of Jordan and Syria. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(4):305-11.
- Grigsby J, Sanders JH. Telemedicine: where it is and where it’s going. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(2):123-7.
- Hjelm NM. Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(2):60-70.
- Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1679-81.
- Gu D, Humbatova G, Xie Y, Yang X, Zolotarev O, Zhang G. Different Roles of telehealth and telemedicine on medical tourism: An empirical study from Azerbaijan. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(8).