Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 24 - 30, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1174345

Abstract

References

  • Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(2):76-83.
  • Siu ASC, Chu FCS, Li TKL, Chow TW, Deng F. Imaging modalities for preoperative assessment in dental implant therapy: an overview. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:23-30.
  • Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol. 2005;76(5):665-73.
  • Mengel R, Kruse B, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. J Periodontol. 2006;77(7):1234-41.
  • Tohnak S, Mehnert AJ, Mahoney M, Crozier S. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification. J Dent Res. 2007;86(11):1057-62.
  • Cho YS. Diagnostic value of dental CT (DentaScan) in dental implant. Chungbuk Med J. 1998;8:11-9.
  • Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant therapy. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;27:4(Suppl 2):4.
  • Ogawa K, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Noujeim M, Seki K, Okano T, et al. Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(1):47-53.
  • Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(4):424-9.
  • Kayal RA. Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment. J Orthod Sci. 2016;5(4):117-20.
  • McDavid WD, Dove SB, Welander U, Tronje G. Dimensional reproduction in direct digital rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75(4):523-7.
  • Choi YG, Kim YK, Eckert SE, Shim CH. Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(4):594-6.
  • Park JB (2010). The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(4):e663-6.
  • Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, et al. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20110429.

The importance of linear measurements made using panoramic radiography in pre-implant site assessment: actual vs. measured

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 24 - 30, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1174345

Abstract

Background: In order to reduce post-operative failure and ensure successful rehabilitation, patients scheduled for dental implant treatment are often evaluated pre-operatively using radiographic images in addition to clinical examination. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the pre-implant site assessment.

Methods: Panoramic images of 150 patients with the total of the 396 implants placed in the maxilla (n=165) and mandible (n=231), were examined in the study. Radiographic measurements (vertical and horizontal) were recorded on the computer using the automatic calibration tab for each radiograph and compared with the actual implant dimensions. Moreover, the effects of location, gender, and change in dimensions on magnification rate (MR) were also investigated. The measurements were made by two experienced observers.

Results: Panoramic vertical measurements were significantly higher in both the maxilla and mandible compared to the actual implant lengths (p<0.05), with excellent inter-observer agreement values (r=0.969). MR of horizontal measurements showed significantly difference just in the premolar and molar regions (p<0.05). MR exhibited negative correlation with increasing in the implant length and diameter.

Conclusions: When attempting to use panoramic radiographs for pre-implant site assessment, the MRs should be considered along with a good clinical examination and experience.

References

  • Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(2):76-83.
  • Siu ASC, Chu FCS, Li TKL, Chow TW, Deng F. Imaging modalities for preoperative assessment in dental implant therapy: an overview. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:23-30.
  • Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol. 2005;76(5):665-73.
  • Mengel R, Kruse B, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. J Periodontol. 2006;77(7):1234-41.
  • Tohnak S, Mehnert AJ, Mahoney M, Crozier S. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification. J Dent Res. 2007;86(11):1057-62.
  • Cho YS. Diagnostic value of dental CT (DentaScan) in dental implant. Chungbuk Med J. 1998;8:11-9.
  • Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant therapy. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;27:4(Suppl 2):4.
  • Ogawa K, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Noujeim M, Seki K, Okano T, et al. Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(1):47-53.
  • Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(4):424-9.
  • Kayal RA. Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment. J Orthod Sci. 2016;5(4):117-20.
  • McDavid WD, Dove SB, Welander U, Tronje G. Dimensional reproduction in direct digital rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75(4):523-7.
  • Choi YG, Kim YK, Eckert SE, Shim CH. Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(4):594-6.
  • Park JB (2010). The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(4):e663-6.
  • Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, et al. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20110429.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Authors

Raif Alan 0000-0003-2602-3481

Ahmet Erbeyoğlu 0000-0002-8443-1048

Publication Date January 31, 2023
Submission Date September 12, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Alan, R., & Erbeyoğlu, A. (2023). The importance of linear measurements made using panoramic radiography in pre-implant site assessment: actual vs. measured. Archives of Current Medical Research, 4(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1174345

Archives of Current Medical Research (ACMR) provides instant open access to all content, bearing in mind the fact that presenting research

free to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

http://www.acmronline.org/