Research Article

Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay

Volume: 31 Number: 1 March 30, 2018
EN

Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the best suitable place for a center that can response any ship-based oil spilage that may occur in Iskenderun Bay. In this context, the risky regions for ship-based incidents in the gulf are detected in the light of the regional conditions using the incident data obtained from Main Search and Rescue Coordination Centre (MSRCC). Suggestions concerning geographical borders of the response center for oil spills, response duration and equipment infrastructure have been made in order to minimize the risks in the region.

Keywords

References

  1. Aamo O.M., Reed M., Lewis A. 1997. Regional contingency planning using the OSCAR oil spill contingency and response model. In: Arctic and Marine Oil spill program technical seminar. Ministry of Supply and Services, Canada. pp: 289-308 Abousamra F., Baric A., Civili F.S. 2005. Transboundary diagnostic analysis for Mediterrean Sea. TDA report. Aguilera M.V.C., Da Fonseca B.B., Ferris T.K., Vidal M.C.R., De Carvalho P.V.R. 2016. Modelling performance variabilities in oil spill response to improve system resilience. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 41: 18-30. Belardo S., Harrald J., Wallace W.A., Ward J. 1984. A partial covering approach to siting response resources for major maritime oil spills. Management Science, 30: 1184-1196. Chen B., Zhang B., Cai Q., Lin W., Liu B. 2012. From challenges to opportunities: towards future strategies and a decision support framework for oil spill preparedness and response in offshore Newfoundland and Labrador. Harris Centre Applied Research Fund Final Report. Ding W.P., Zheng P. 2015. Allocation of professional oil recovery ships based on the center of gravity method. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 744-746: 2357-2361. Esnaf Ş., Küçükdeniz T. 2009. A fuzzy clustering-based hybrid method for a multi-facility location problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20: 259-265. Ezra S., Feinstein S., Pelly I., Bauman D., Miloslavsky I. 2000. Weathering of fuel oil spill on the east Mediterranean coast, Ashdod, Israel. Organic Geochemistry, 31(12): 1733-1741. http://www.ubak.gov.tr/BLSM_WIYS/DTGM/tr/Kitaplar/20161116_165220_64032_1_64480.pdf, Retrieved 25/08/2017. Iakovou E., Ip C.M., Douligeris C., Korde A. 1997. Optimal location and capacity of emergency cleanup equipment for oil spill response. European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1): 72-80. Krohling R., Campanharo V.C. 2011. Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spil in the sea. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4): 4190-4197. Gucma L., Juszkiewicz W., Lazuga K. 2012. The Method of optimal allocation of oil spill response in the region of Baltic Sea maritime university of Szczecin, Poland. International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. Lehr W., Jones R., Evans M., Simecek-Beatty D., Overstreet R. 2002. Revisions of the ADIOS oil spill model. Environmental Modelling and Software, 17(2): 189-197. Live Map. 2017 www.marinetraffic.com, Live Map, Retrieved August 8, 2017. Onnela N. 2015. Determining the optimal distribution center location. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Business and Built Environment, University of Tampere Techonolgy. Ozcan T., Katagan T., Kocatas A. 2005. Brachyuran crabs from Iskenderun Bay (Southeastern Turkey). Crustaceana, 78(2): 237-243. Psaraftis H., Tharakan G., Ceder A. 1986. Optimal response to oil spills: The strategic decision case. Operations Research, 34: 203-217. Ratner M. 2011. Implications of Egypt’s turmoil on global oil and natural gas supply. CRS Report. Robertson T. 2007. Response gap estimated for two operating areas in Prince William Sound. Report to the Prince William Sound regional citizen’s advisory council, Anchorage, AK. Salman F.S., Yücel E. 2015. Emergency facility location under random network damage: Insights from the Istanbul case. Computers and Operations Research, 62: 266-281. Srinivasa A.V., Wilhelm W.E. 1997. A procedure for optimizing tactical response in oil spill cleanup operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 102(3): 554-574. Tuler S., Kay R., Seager T., Linkov I. 2006. Objective sand performance metrics in oil spill response: The Bouchard-120 and Chalk Point spill responses. SERI Report, 06-001. Turley C.M. 1999. The changing Mediterranean Sea: a sensitive ecosystem?. Progress in Oceanography, 44(1): 387-400. Verma M., Gendreau M., Laporte G. 2013. Optimal location and capability of oil-spill response facilities for the south coast of Newfoundland. Omega, 41(5): 856-867. Walker A.H., Ducey Jr, D.L., Lacey S.J., Harrald J.R. 1994. Implementing an effective response management system. In 1995 International Oil spill Conference Technical Report IOSC-001. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Hydrobiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Muge Buber * This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 30, 2018

Submission Date

October 24, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 26, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 31 Number: 1

APA
Buber, M., & Toz, A. C. T. (2018). Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay. Acta Biologica Turcica, 31(1), 27-32. https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD
AMA
1.Buber M, Toz ACT. Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay. Acta Biologica Turcica. 2018;31(1):27-32. https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD
Chicago
Buber, Muge, and Ali Cemal Toz Toz. 2018. “Selection of the Best Suitable Place As a Marine Pollution Response Center: Suggestions for Iskenderun Bay”. Acta Biologica Turcica 31 (1): 27-32. https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD.
EndNote
Buber M, Toz ACT (March 1, 2018) Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay. Acta Biologica Turcica 31 1 27–32.
IEEE
[1]M. Buber and A. C. T. Toz, “Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay”, Acta Biologica Turcica, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 27–32, Mar. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD
ISNAD
Buber, Muge - Toz, Ali Cemal Toz. “Selection of the Best Suitable Place As a Marine Pollution Response Center: Suggestions for Iskenderun Bay”. Acta Biologica Turcica 31/1 (March 1, 2018): 27-32. https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD.
JAMA
1.Buber M, Toz ACT. Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay. Acta Biologica Turcica. 2018;31:27–32.
MLA
Buber, Muge, and Ali Cemal Toz Toz. “Selection of the Best Suitable Place As a Marine Pollution Response Center: Suggestions for Iskenderun Bay”. Acta Biologica Turcica, vol. 31, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 27-32, https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD.
Vancouver
1.Muge Buber, Ali Cemal Toz Toz. Selection of the best suitable place as a marine pollution response center: suggestions for Iskenderun Bay. Acta Biologica Turcica [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 1;31(1):27-32. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA77FP54DD