BibTex RIS Cite

Çocukluk Çağı Benign Kemik Tümörlerinin Demografik Özellikleri ve Klinik Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2008, Volume: 41 Issue: 1, 7 - 13, 01.04.2008

Murat Arıkan Erdal Metin Deniz Gürler Şafak Güngör Yaman Karakoç

Abstract

Bone tumors in paediatric age are rare tumors with an incidence of 0.2% and in among ali bone tumors are in the 3rd fre-quency but they are important because of the loss of occupation and the problems in the diagnosis and treatment modalities. Our aim in this study is to anatyze demographic features, the cofactors, the geographic characteristics and pecuilarities of benign bone tumors follovved up in our department and the methods of approachments to these tumors retrospectively. İn this regard 200 patients are retrospectively analyzed who were followed up in our clinic.

Keywords

Benign bone tumors demography.

References

  • Enneking WF, Spannier SS, Goodman MA. A system fort he surgical staging o f musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop 2003;4 15:4.
  • Karakurt L, Yılmaz E, Varol T, Özdemir H. Dirsekte soliter osteokondroma bağlı gelişen unlar sinir basısı: Olgu Sunumu. Açta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2004;38:291-4.
  • Lawrence W JR. Soft tissue sarcomas in adults and child
  • ren .A comparison CA. C ancerJ Clin 1994;44:197-9.
  • James O, Johnston; Tumors in ortopedics. Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Ortopedics, Harry B. Skinner, 1995:236-314.
  • Herring JA, (editör). Benign m usculoskeletal tumors.
  • ln:Tachd]ian's pediatric orthopaedics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2002:1897.
  • Kerns LL, Simon MA. Surgical theory, staging and surgery
  • o f muskuloskeletal neopiasms. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:473.
  • Engin K, Sağlık Y, Aydınlı U. Kemik ve Yumuşak Doku Tümörleri. Klinik Değerlendirme ve Görüntüleme, 2005:27.
  • Woertler K. Benign bone tumors and tmors tike lesions:
  • Value o f cross sectional imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1320.
  • Sundaram M. Magnetic resonance imaging for solitary lesi­
  • ons o f bone: When, why, how useful? J Orthop Sci 1999; 4:383
  • Magid D. Two-dimensional and three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in musculoskeletal tumors. Rdaiol Clin North Am 1993;31:425.
  • Simon M, Kirschner P: Scintipgraphic evalution o f primer bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62-A.758.
  • Mankin HJ, Langin TA, Spanier SS: The hazards o f the biopsy, J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:656-63.
  • Aboulafia AJ: Biopsy. Instr Course Lect 1999;48:587-90.
  • Buckwalter JA, Brandser EA : Metastatic disease of the ske- ieton. Am Fam Physician 1997;55:1761-8.
  • Simon MA, Springfield D. Surgery for Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia: Lippincontt-Raven Publishers 1998; 357-91
  • Marcove RC, Arlen M. Atlas o f bone pathology with clinical and radiographic correiation, based on H L Jaffe.S course. Lippincott Company, 1992. 13

Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach

Year 2008, Volume: 41 Issue: 1, 7 - 13, 01.04.2008

Murat Arıkan Erdal Metin Deniz Gürler Şafak Güngör Yaman Karakoç

Abstract

Çocukluk çağında görülen kemik tümörleri tüm tümörler içerisinde %0.2'Hk bir oranla nadir görülen tümörler grubunda olmasına rağmen özellikle genç yaş popülasyonunda 3. sırada karşılaşılan bir tümör olup iş gücü kaybı, tanı ve tedavideki olası yaklaşım problemleri açısından önemlidir. Amacımız kliniğimizde takip ettiğimiz pediatrik benign kemik tümör olgularının demografik özelliklerini, eşlik eden faktörleri, tümörlerin dağılım bölgeleri ve sıklıklarını gözden geçirmek ve tümöre yaklaşım yöntemlerini retrospektif olarak değerlendirmektir. Bu amaçla kliniğimizde takip edilen 200 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi.

Keywords

Benign kemik tümörleri demografi.

References

  • Enneking WF, Spannier SS, Goodman MA. A system fort he surgical staging o f musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop 2003;4 15:4.
  • Karakurt L, Yılmaz E, Varol T, Özdemir H. Dirsekte soliter osteokondroma bağlı gelişen unlar sinir basısı: Olgu Sunumu. Açta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2004;38:291-4.
  • Lawrence W JR. Soft tissue sarcomas in adults and child
  • ren .A comparison CA. C ancerJ Clin 1994;44:197-9.
  • James O, Johnston; Tumors in ortopedics. Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Ortopedics, Harry B. Skinner, 1995:236-314.
  • Herring JA, (editör). Benign m usculoskeletal tumors.
  • ln:Tachd]ian's pediatric orthopaedics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2002:1897.
  • Kerns LL, Simon MA. Surgical theory, staging and surgery
  • o f muskuloskeletal neopiasms. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:473.
  • Engin K, Sağlık Y, Aydınlı U. Kemik ve Yumuşak Doku Tümörleri. Klinik Değerlendirme ve Görüntüleme, 2005:27.
  • Woertler K. Benign bone tumors and tmors tike lesions:
  • Value o f cross sectional imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1320.
  • Sundaram M. Magnetic resonance imaging for solitary lesi­
  • ons o f bone: When, why, how useful? J Orthop Sci 1999; 4:383
  • Magid D. Two-dimensional and three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in musculoskeletal tumors. Rdaiol Clin North Am 1993;31:425.
  • Simon M, Kirschner P: Scintipgraphic evalution o f primer bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62-A.758.
  • Mankin HJ, Langin TA, Spanier SS: The hazards o f the biopsy, J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:656-63.
  • Aboulafia AJ: Biopsy. Instr Course Lect 1999;48:587-90.
  • Buckwalter JA, Brandser EA : Metastatic disease of the ske- ieton. Am Fam Physician 1997;55:1761-8.
  • Simon MA, Springfield D. Surgery for Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia: Lippincontt-Raven Publishers 1998; 357-91
  • Marcove RC, Arlen M. Atlas o f bone pathology with clinical and radiographic correiation, based on H L Jaffe.S course. Lippincott Company, 1992. 13
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Murat Arıkan This is me

Erdal Metin This is me

Deniz Gürler This is me

Şafak Güngör This is me

Yaman Karakoç This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 41 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Arıkan, M. ., Metin, E. ., Gürler, D. ., Güngör, Ş. ., et al. (2008). Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach. Acta Oncologica Turcica, 41(1), 7-13.
AMA Arıkan M, Metin E, Gürler D, Güngör Ş, Karakoç Y. Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach. Acta Oncologica Turcica. April 2008;41(1):7-13.
Chicago Arıkan, Murat, Erdal Metin, Deniz Gürler, Şafak Güngör, and Yaman Karakoç. “Demographic Features O F Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation O F Clinical Approach”. Acta Oncologica Turcica 41, no. 1 (April 2008): 7-13.
EndNote Arıkan M, Metin E, Gürler D, Güngör Ş, Karakoç Y (April 1, 2008) Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach. Acta Oncologica Turcica 41 1 7–13.
IEEE M. . Arıkan, E. . Metin, D. . Gürler, Ş. . Güngör, and Y. . Karakoç, “Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach”, Acta Oncologica Turcica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2008.
ISNAD Arıkan, Murat et al. “Demographic Features O F Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation O F Clinical Approach”. Acta Oncologica Turcica 41/1 (April 2008), 7-13.
JAMA Arıkan M, Metin E, Gürler D, Güngör Ş, Karakoç Y. Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach. Acta Oncologica Turcica. 2008;41:7–13.
MLA Arıkan, Murat et al. “Demographic Features O F Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation O F Clinical Approach”. Acta Oncologica Turcica, vol. 41, no. 1, 2008, pp. 7-13.
Vancouver Arıkan M, Metin E, Gürler D, Güngör Ş, Karakoç Y. Demographic Features o f Childhood Benign Bone Tumors and Evaluation o f Clinical Approach. Acta Oncologica Turcica. 2008;41(1):7-13.