Periodontal Plastik Cerrahi Sonrası Postoperatif Bakım Konusunda Hastaların Bilgilendirilmesi için YouTubeTM Videolarının bir Seçenek Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, periodontal yumuşak doku cerrahisine odaklanarak postoperatif bakımla ilgili YouTubeTM videolarının güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: YouTubeTM araması için üç anahtar kelime kullanıldı: "diş eti cerrahisi sonrası yapılması gerekenler", "postoperatif diş eti cerrahisi hasta bilgileri" ve "Dişeti cerrahisi sonrası ne yapılır". Video uzunluğu, süresi, toplam görüntülenme sayısı, beğenme sayısı, beğenmeme sayısı ve yorumlar kaydedildi. Etkileşim indeksi, görüntüleme oranları ve video güç indeksi (VPI) hesaplanmıştır. Videoların güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmek için Global Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) ve Mod-DISCERN ölçekleri kullanıldı. Ameliyat sonrası talimatlar kanama, ilaçlar, diyet, günlük aktiviteler ve ağız hijyeni için kategorize edildi ve genel kullanışlılık puanı da hesaplandı. Bulgular: Toplam 210 video değerlendirildi ve 32 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Videoların 29'u faydalı iken 1 video yanıltıcı video içeriğine sahipti. Ayrıca 2 video da hasta görüşüydü. Videoların ortalama GQS puanı 3.53±0.94 idi. Mod-DISCERN puanına göre videoların %90,6'sında güvenilir kaynaklar gösterilmiş ve amaçlar açıkça belirtilmiştir. Toplam içerik kullanışlılığı puanı tüm videolar için 3.22±1.68 ve toplam Mod-Discern puanı 2.87±1.09 idi ve kullanışlı videolar için daha yüksekti. Sonuç: YouTubeTM'deki "periodontal plastik cerrahi sonrası postoperatif bakım" konulu videoların güvenilir bir şekilde faydalı olabileceği sonucuna varılabilir. Profesyonel olmayan kullanıcılar tarafından üretilen içeriklerin güvenilirlik ve kalite açısından iyileştirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Keywords

• Otogreft
• Plastik cerrahi
• Postoperatif dönem
• Sosyal medya

The Evaluation of YouTubeTM Videos as an Option for Informing Patients on Postoperative Care Following Periodontal Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTubeTM videos on postoperative care with a focus on periodontal soft tissue surgery. Materials and Methods: A YouTubeTM search was performed using three keywords: "Post-op instructions gingival surgery”, “post-operative patient information gingival surgery”, and “What to do after gum surgery.” Video length, duration, total views, number of likes, dislikes, and comments were recorded. The interaction index, view rates, and video power index (VPI) were calculated. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) and Mod-DISCERN scales were used to assess the reliability and quality of the videos. Postoperative instructions were categorized for bleeding, medications, diet, daily activities, and oral hygiene, and an overall content usefulness score was also calculated. Results: A total of 210 videos were evaluated and 32 videos were included in the study. While 29 of the videos were useful videos, 1 video had misleading video content. In addition, 2 videos were patient views. The mean GQS score of the videos was 3.53±0.94. According to the Mod-DISCERN score, 90.6% of the videos showed reliable sources and the purposes were clearly stated. The total content usefulness score was 3.22±1.68 for all videos, and the total Mod-Discern score was 2.87±1.09 and was higher for useful videos. Conclusion: It can be concluded that videos on "postoperative care after periodontal plastic surgery" on YouTubeTM can be reliably useful. Content produced by non-professional users needs to be improved in terms of reliability and quality.

Keywords

• Autografts
• Plastic surgery
• Postoperative period
• Social media

References

1. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):333-68. doi: 10.1111/ prd.12059.
2. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang HL, Giannobile WV. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020;91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
3. Pini Prato G, Di Gianfilippo R. Challenges and success in periodontal plastic surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(12):1572-1581. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13869
4. Miller PD. Root coverage grafting for regeneration and aesthetics. Periodontol 2000. 1993;1:118-127.
5. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2006;77(12):2070-2079. doi:10.1902/jop.2006.050296
6. Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008;79(3):425-430. doi:10.1902/jop.2008.070325
7. Buff LR, Bürklin T, Eickholz P, Mönting JS, Ratka- Krüger P. Does harvesting connective tissue grafts from the palate cause persistent sensory dysfunction? A pilot study. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(6):479-489.
8. Mounssif I, Bentivogli V, Rendón A, et al. Patientreported outcome measures after periodontal surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(12):7715-7724. doi:10.1007/ s00784-023-05362-y

9. Jepsen K, Sculean A, Jepsen S. Complications and treatment errors related to regenerative periodontal surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2023;92(1):120-134. doi:10.1111/ prd.12504
10. Palaiologou A, Kotsakis GA. Dentist-Patient Communication of Treatment Outcomes in Periodontal Practice: A Need for Dental Patient–Reported Outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(2):101443. doi:10.1016/j. jebdp.2020.101443
11. Patel AM, Richards PS, Wang HL, Inglehart MR. Surgical or non-surgical periodontal treatment: factors affecting patient decision making. J Periodontol. 2006;77(4):678-683. doi:10.1902/jop.2006.050206
12. Blinder D, Rotenberg L, Peleg M, Taicher S. Patient compliance to instructions after oral surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(3):216-219. doi:10.1054/ijom.2000.0045
13. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):202-208. doi:10.1111/odi.12434
14. Kovalski LNS, Cardoso FB, D’Avila OP, et al. Is the YouTubeTM an useful source of information on oral leukoplakia? Oral Dis. 2019;25(8):1897-1905. doi:10.1111/odi.13161
15. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173- 194. doi:10.1177/1460458213512220
16. Bizzi I, Ghezzi P, Paudyal P. Health information quality of websites on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(3):308-314. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12668
17. Kaval ME, Sarsar F, Buduneli N, Güneri P. A sustainable, self-sufficient peer review algorithm for health-related YouTube videos: A proposal. Oral Dis. Published online March 13, 2023:odi.14555. doi:10.1111/ odi.14555
18. Mohamed F, Shoufan A. Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):86. doi:10.1186/s12889- 023-17585-5
19. de Oliveira Júnior AJ, Oliveira JM, Bretz YP, Mialhe FL. Online social networks for prevention and promotion of oral health: a systematic review. Can J Dent Hyg. 2023;57(2):83-97.
20. Bengi VU, Saraç Atagün Ö, Ceylan Şen S, Özcan E, Paksoy T, Güler ÖŞ. How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube? Spec Care Dentist. Published online January 4, 2024:scd.12957. doi:10.1111/scd.12957
21. Rachmawati Y, Putri D, Hariyani N, Bahar A, Maharani D. Analysis of quality, usefulness, reliability, visibility, and popularity of videos about dental caries on YouTube: A cross-sectional analysis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent. 2022;12(2):245. doi:10.4103/jispcd. JISPCD_246_21
22. Saraç Atagün Ö, Ceylan Şen S, Paksoy T. Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information about dentin hypersensitivity. Int J Dental Hygiene. Published online August 25, 2023:idh.12723. doi:10.1111/idh.12723
23. Sadry S, Meseli SE, Buyukbasaran E. Does the content quality of YouTube videos about aligners differ from the perspectives of dentists and orthodontists? APOS. 2023;13:215-222. doi:10.25259/APOS_14_2023
24. Güler B, Özaltun B. Is YoutubeTM an accurate source of patient-information for awareness about periodontal diseases? d3000. 2021;9(1):23-35. doi:10.5195/ d3000.2021.134
25. Ceylan Şen S, Paksoy T, Göller Bulut D, Ustaoğlu G. Does YouTube TM provide reliable information on oral candidiasis? Oral Dis. 2023;29(1):290-299. doi:10.1111/ odi.14338
26. Meseli SE, Sadry S, Efe N. How reliable are YouTube videos on laser-assisted surgical treatment of the gummy smile? APOS. 2022;13:30-37. doi:10.25259/ APOS_155_2022
27. Hamdan AA, Shaqman M, Abu Karaky A, Hassona Y, Bouchard P. Medical reliability of a video-sharing website: The gingival recession model. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(2):175-183. doi:10.1111/eje.12417
28. Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo MP, et al. Reliability and Accuracy of YouTube Peri-Implantitis Videos as an Educational Source for Patients in Population-Based Prevention Strategies. Healthcare. 2023;11(14):2094. doi:10.3390/healthcare11142094
29. Ramadhani A, Zettira Z, Rachmawati YL, Hariyani N, Maharani DA. Quality and Reliability of Halitosis Videos on YouTube as a Source of Information. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(10):120. doi:10.3390/dj9100120
30. Yagci F. Evaluation of YouTube as an information source for denture care. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(4):623- 629. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.045
31. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0082469
32. Lo AS, Esser MJ, Gordon KE. YouTube: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17(4):541-545. doi:10.1016/j. yebeh.2010.02.004
33. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FKL. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):196-201. doi:10.1111/ odi.12404
34. Yalcin Ülker GM, Duygu G. Evaluation of YouTubeTM Videos as a Patient Education Source for Postoperative Care After Tooth Extraction Diş Çekimi Sonrası Postoperatif Bakım Için Hasta Eğitim Kaynağı Olarak YoutubeTM Videolarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydın dental. 2015;9(3):89-102. doi:10.17932/IAU. DENTAL.2015.009/dental_v09i30010
35. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(9):1776-1783. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004
36. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(6):661-664. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.022
37. Bezner SK, Hodgman EI, Diesen DL, et al. Pediatric surgery on YouTubeTM: is the truth out there? J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(4):586-589. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.004
38. Wainstein BK, Sterling-Levis K, Baker SA, Taitz J, Brydon M. Use of the Internet by parents of paediatric patients. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42(9):528-532. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00916.x
39. Babayiğit O, Tastan Eroglu Z, Ozkan Sen D, Ucan Yarkac F. Potential Use of ChatGPT for Patient Information in Periodontology: A Descriptive Pilot Study. Cureus. Published online November 8, 2023. doi:10.7759/ cureus.48518
40. Mueller SM, Hongler VNS, Jungo P, et al. Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e15599. doi:10.2196/15599
41. Bakhishov H, Isler SC, Bozyel B, Yıldırım B, Tekindal MA, Ozdemir B. De-epithelialized gingival graft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using the tunnel technique: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(7):970-983. doi:10.1111/ jcpe.13452
42. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, et al. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(4):396-403. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12224