YoutubeTM Videoları Çene Ucu Estetiği ile İlgili Güvenilir Bilgi Sunuyor mu?

Abstract

Amaç: YouTube’da hastalar ve hekimler tarafından çene ucu estetiği tedavisinde uygulanan popüler yöntemler olan genioplasti, dolgu ve silikon uygulamaları hakkında yüklenen videolardaki bilgi içeriğini değerlendirmektir. Materyal- Metod: Google Trends web sitesinden ‘chin aesthetic and chin augmentation’ terimleri belirlenmiştir. Dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan 50 video değerlendirilmiştir. Videolar, yüklendiği kaynağa göre plastik cerrah, doktor ve bireysel kullanıcı olmak üzere üç gruba ayrılmıştır. Videoların kalitesi, DISCERN, kalite indeksi (VIQI) ve Global Quality Score (GQS) ile değerlendirilmiştir. İstatistiksel analizi yapılırken, ShapiroWilk testi, Mann Whitney U testi ve Spearman korelasyon testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Plastik cerrahlar (%70) en çok paylaşımı yapmıştır. Dolgu uygulamasından 26 paylaşımda bahsedilirken, 4 paylaşımda silikon uygulamasından bahsedilmiştir. Videoların yaşı hariç, karakteristik özellikleri ile kalite ve içerikleri arasında anlamlı düzeyde korelasyon olduğu görülmüştür (P<0.05). DISCERN puanı, GQS puanı, total content ve total VIQI skorları yüksek içerikli grupta daha yüksek bulunmuştur (P <0.001). Etkileşim indeksi ve izlenme oranı hariç toplam içerik puanı, toplam VIQI puanı, GQS ve DISCERN skorlarıda kendi aralarında pozitif korelasyon göstermiştir (P<0.05). Sonuçlar: YouTube da çene estetiği ile alakalı paylaşılan videoların kalite düzeyi ortalama olmasına rağmen bilgi içeriği bakımından yetersiz bulunmuştur. Uzman hekimler hastaların YouTube’dan yararlanmalarına yardımcı olmak için, hastalarını doğruluğunu onayladıkları bilgi kaynaklarına yönlendirmelidir.

Keywords

• YouTube
• Estetik
• Çene

Are YoutubeTM Videos Serve Reliable Information About Chin Aesthetics and Chin Augmentation?

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the information content in the videos uploaded on YouTube by patients and physicians about genioplasty, filler and silicone applications, which are popular methods applied in the treatment of chin tip aesthetics. Material-Method: The terms 'chin aesthetic and chin augmentation' were determined from the Google Trends website. 50 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Videos are divided into three groups according to the source from which they are uploaded: plastic surgeon, doctor and individual user. The quality of the videos was evaluated by DISCERN, quality index (VIQI) and Global Quality Score (GQS). While performing statistical analysis, ShapiroWilk test, Mann Whitney U test and Spearman correlation test were used. Results: Plastic surgeons (70%) shared the most posts. While filler application was mentioned in 26 posts, silicone application was mentioned in 4 posts. It was observed that there was a significant correlation between the characteristics of the videos, excluding their age, and their quality and content (P<0.05). DISCERN score, GQS score, total content and total VIQI scores were found to be higher in the high content group (P <0.001). Except for interaction index and viewing rate, total content score, total VIQI score, GQS and DISCERN scores also showed a positive correlation with each other (P<0.05). Results: Although the quality level of the videos shared about chin aesthetics on YouTube was average, they were found to be insufficient in terms of information content. In order to help patients benefit from YouTube, specialist physicians should direct their patients to information sources that they confirm are accurate.

Keywords

• YouTube
• Aesthetic
• Chin

References

1. Lundström F, Lundström A, Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics101 (3):244-247, 1992,
2. Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R, Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty, Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2003; 78: 385-407,
3. Naini FB, The chin, Facial Aesthetics, 1st edition, West Sussex, Wiley- Blackwell, 312-333, 2011,
4. Arnett W, McLaughlin RP, Clinical examination, Facial and Dental Planning for Orthodontists and Oral Surgeons (Parkinson M, ed), 1st edition, London, Mosby Elsevier, 47-73, 2004,
5. Hamilton MM, Chan D, Adjunctive procedures to neck rejuvenation, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014;22(02):231–242
6. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ, Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 119:464–471, 2001,
7. Kiekens RMA, Maltha JC, Van ‘t Hof MA, A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: Reproducibility and validity, Eur J Orthod;27:579–584, 2005,
8. Park, J, H,, et al, Hard and soft tissue changes and long-term stability after vertical height reduction genioplasty using biodegradable fixation, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2019, 48,8: 1051-1056,

9. Erdem H, Sisik A, The reliability of bariatric surgery videos in YouTube platform, Obes Surg 2018;28:712–6,
10. Özdal ÖZ, Bozkurt A, Gas ̧ S, Potential patient education of YouTube videos related to wisdom tooth surgical removed, J Craniofac Surg 2019 [Epub ahead of print],
11. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Sculy C, YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer, Oral Dis 2016;22:202-8,
12. D, Charnock, S, Shepperd, G, Needham, R, Gann, DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices, J, Epidemiol, Community Health, 53 (2) (1999) 105–111,
13. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S, A systematic review of patient in ammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web, Am J Gastroenterol, 2007; 102: 2070-7,
14. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y, Quality of YouTubeTM videos on dental implants, Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:463-8,
15. Gas ̧ S, Zincir O ̈ O ̈ , Bozkurt AP, Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776–83,
16. Lena Y, Dindarog ̆lu F, Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubee video analysis, Angle Orthod, 2017;88:208–214,
17. Yavuz MC, Buyuk SK, Genc E, Does YouTubeTM offer high quality information? Evaluation of accelerated orthodontics videos, Ir J Med Sci 2020; 189: 505-509,
18. Kılınç DD, Sayar G, Assessment of reliability of youtube videos on orthodontics, Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 145-150,
19. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK, Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjo ̈gren’s syndrome? Oral Dis 2016;22:196–201,
20. Strychowsky JE, Nayan S, Farrokhyar F, MacLean J, YouTube: a good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:972–5,
21. Gas ̧ S, Zincir O ̈ O ̈ , Bozkurt AP, Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776–83,
22. PATEL, Manish; PATEL, Mit M,; CRISTEL, Robert T, Quality and reliability of YouTube for patient information on neurotoxins, Facial Plastic Surgery, 2020, 36,06: 773-777,
23. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT, YouTubeTM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery, J Orthod 2017;44:90–6,
24. Wong K, Doong J, Trang T, Joo S, Chien AL, YouTube videos on botulinum toxin A for wrinkles: a useful resource for patient education, Dermatol Surg 2017;43:1466–73,