Abstract

Giriş: Bağlantı sonrası fiber restorasyonların kökkanallarından ayrılması en sık karşılaşılan başarısızlıktır. Self adeziv sistemler azaltılmış simantasyon prosedür avantajına sahiptir. Üç farklı self-adeziv rezin sistemin kullanıldığı bu çalışmanın amacı fiber postların koronal ve apikal üçlülerdeki bağlanma dayanımını değerlendirmektir. Materyal ve metod: Bu çalışma için 30 adet yeni çekilmiş tek köklü insan dişi seçildi. Örnekler 10!arlı rasgele gruplandı. Fiber postlar (RelyX, 3M, ESPE,UK) RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA),G-Cem (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) ve Maxcem Elite (Kerr Hawe Neos Orange,CA, USA) adezivler kullanılarak kanallara yerleştirildi. İtme testleri için örneklerden diş uzun eksenine dik ve birbirine paralel 2 disk şeklinde kesit alındı. İstatistiksel analizler için tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Kruskall-Wallis testleri kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: RelyX Unicem tüm örneklerde koronal bölgede en yüksek itme değerleri ortaya çıkardı. G-Cem ise apikal bölgede en yüksek değerlere ulaştı. Tüm veriler değerlendirildiğinde RelyX-Unicem yine en yüksek değerleri verdi. Karar: Kanal içi simantasyonunda self-adeziv sistemler pratik çözüm yoludur. Çoklu aşama gerektirmezler. Çalışmada kullanılan bütün sistemler kabul edilebilir bağlanma değerleri sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Self-adeziv sistemler, Kök-Kanal Simantasyonu, Post-Kor

PULL-OUT STRENGTH OF FIBER POSTS LUTED WITH DIFFERENT SELF-ADHESIVES

Abstract

Introduction: Dislodging from the root canals is the most common failure of bonded fiber restorations. Self-adhesive system has the advantage of reduced cementation procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strengths of fiber posts with three different self-adhesive/resin systems to coronal and apical thirds of the post space dentine Materials and methods: Thirty freshly extracted single-root human teeth were selected for this study. The specimens were then randomly divided into 3 subgroups each containing 10 samples. Fiber posts (RelyX, 3M, ESPE, UK) were inserted into canals using RelyX Unicem 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), G-Cem (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Hawe Neos Orange,CA, USA) adhesives. Two disc shaped sections perpendicular to the long axis of each root sample were obtained for push-out tests. Failure load value was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and KruskallWallis tests. Results: RelyX Unicem exhibited the highest mean push-out bond strength values at the coronal section of all samples. G-Cem exhibited higher push-out bond strength values at apical section The overall bonding data of RelyX Unicem was also observed to be the highest among groups. Conclusion: Self-adhesive systems are of practical ways of intra-canal cementation. It does not require multiple steps for success. All the systems offered acceptable retention ability.

Keywords

• Self-adhesive systems, root-canal cementation, post-core

References

1. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2006;39:809-18.
2. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:10-5.
3. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth- colored posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:302- 10.
4. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:476-82.
5. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:26- 36.
6. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:360-7.
7. Ohlmann B, Fickenscher F, Dreyhaupt J, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Schmitter M. The effect of two luting agents, pretreatment of the post, and pretreatment of the canal dentin on the retention of fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Dent. 2008;36:87-92.
8. Victorino KR, Kuga MC, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, So MV, Pereira JR. The effects of chlorhexidine and ethanol on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19:96-100.

9. D’Arcangelo C, Zazzeroni S, D’Amario M, Vadini M, De Angelis F, Trubiani O, et al. Bond strengths of three types of fibre- reinforced post systems in various regions of root canals. Int Endod J. 2008;41:322-8.
10. Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:557- 63.
11. Saskalauskaite E, Tam LE, McComb D. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:262-8.
12. Rezende EC, Gomes GM, Szesz AL, Bueno CE, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of Dentin Moisture on Cementation of Fiber Posts to Root Canals. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18:29-34.
13. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Zuchner H, Schafer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites--a comparative study. Dent Mater. 2006;22:934-41.
14. Cury AH, Goracci C, de Lima Navarro MF, Carvalho RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, et al. Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod. 2006;32:537-40.
15. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Cury AH, Tay F, et al. Immediate and 24- hour evaluation of the interfacial strengths of fiber posts. J Endod. 2006;32:1174-7.
16. Kremeier K, Fasen L, Klaiber B, Hofmann N. Influence of endodontic post type (glass fiber, quartz fiber or gold) and luting material on push-out bond strength to dentin in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24:660-6.
17. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:326-33.
18. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:189-92.
19. Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Kinetic analysis of monomer conversion in auto- and dual-polymerizing modes of commercial resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:128-36.
20. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater. 2007;23:829-39.
21. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod. 2001;27:321- 4.
22. Muniz L, Mathias P. The influence of sodium hypochlorite and root canal sealers on post retention in different dentin regions. Oper Dent. 2005;30:533-9.
23. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/ self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent. 1998;26:609-16.
24. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003;19:199-205.
25. Vaz RR, Hipolito VD, D’Alpino PH, Goes MF. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthodont. 2012;21:101-11.
26. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, D’Amario M, Zazzeroni S, Ciampoli C, Caputi S. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations. Oper Dent. 2009;34:328-36.