Case Report

TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT

Volume: 4 Number: 1 April 8, 2018
  • Sanaz Sadry
  • Fatma Bursalı
  • Nourtzan Kechagıa

TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT

Abstract

The aim of this case report; is to present the treatment of a male patient with skeletal Class II, dental Class II division II associated with deep bite by the using of functional appliance through a short period of fixed orthodontic treatment. A 14-year 4-month old male patient applied for treatment in our clinic with a cheef complains of retrognathic mandible. The radiographic and clinical examinations and evaluations showed skeletal class II anomalies. Dental class II division II anomaly with increased over bite had been identified. The orthodontic treatment started with functional appliance as activator. After 8 months mandibular advanced and Class I molar and canine relationship had been achieved. after functional treatment 0.018 slot straight wire Roth brackets applied for both the upper and the lower teeth. After 6 months for both jaws a 0.016 x 0.022 stainless steel wire had been applied. After that the intrusion of the incisive teeth had been achieved by using CIA. In order to achieve a Class I molar and canine relationship, Class II elastics had been used at the end of the treatment. A case with a skeletal class II and Dental class II division II with increased over bite was treated through a 2 years and 8 month of treatment and dental class I relationship with normal overbite and overjet and good occlusion achieved at the end of the treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Acar Güngör A. Sınıf II maloklüzyonların tedavisinde molar distalizasyonu. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2006;27:97-105. [2] Ast DB, Alaway M, Darker HL. The prevalence of malocclusion, related to dental caries and lost first permanent molars, in a fluoridated city and a fluoride deficientcity. Am J Orthod 1962;48:106-13. [3] Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 242-251. [4] Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 74-84. [5] Epker BN, Fish CF. The surgicalorthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983; 84:408-21. [6] Epker BN, Fish CF. The surgicalorthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency. Part II. Am J Orthod 1983;84: 491-507. [7] Harnick DJ. Case report: Class II correction using a modified Wilson bimetric distalizing arch and maxillary second molar extraction. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 275-280. [8] Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. 1st Ed., Saunders, Philadelphia, USA, 2001, 354-361. [9] Graber TM, Vanorsdall R, Vig K. 2000. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, Third Edition St. Louis, Toronto, London: The C.V. Mosby. Comp. [10] Proffit WR, Fields HW, Ackerman JL, Bailey LJ, Tulloch JFC. 2000. Contemporary Orthodontics, Third Edition St. Louis, Toronto, London: The C.V. Mosby Comp. [11] Graber T. 1997. Functional Analysis. Graber T, Petrovic A, (Ed.). Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances, pages, 125-160. Baltimore, Boston: Mosby- Year Book, Inc. [12] Engel G, Cornforth G, Damerell JM, Gordon J, Levy P, McAlpine J. et al. 1980. Treatment of deep-bite cases. Am J Orthod, 77(1): 1-13. [13] Arvystas MG. 1990. Nonextraction treatment of severe class II, division 2 malocclusions. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97(6): 510-521. [14] Bishara SE, Jamison JE, Peterson LC, DeKock WH. 1981. Longitudinal changes in standing height and mandibular parameters between the ages of 8 and 17 years. Am J Orthod, 80(2): 115-135. [15] Engel G, Cornforth G, Damerell JM, Gordon J, Levy P, McAlpine J. et al. 1980. Treatment of deep-bite cases. Am J Orthod, 77(1): 1-13. [16] Sharma NS. Management of growing skeletal class II patient: A case report. Int J Clin Paediatr Dent 2013; 6:48-54. [17] Dağsuyu ĠM. Sınıf II Bölüm 1 maloklüzyonlu bireylerde fonksiyonel ortopedik tedavi etkilerinin aksiyografik ve sefalometrik yöntemlerle incelenmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2011;21:196-212. [18] Özel N AA. Sınıf II maloklüzyonların tedavisinde kullanılan fonksiyonel ortopedik apareyler. Smyrna Tıp Dergisi 2011:48-52 [19] Nanda R. 2005. Management of Deep Overbite Malocclusion (chapter 7). Biomechanics and esthetic strategies in clinical orthodontics: Elsevier inc. [20] Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W. 2004. Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod, 26(3): 237-244. [21] Burstone CR. 1977. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod, 72(1): 1-22. [22] Kim TW, Kim H, Lee SJ. 2006. Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing class II division 2 patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130(5): 676-685.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Case Report

Authors

Sanaz Sadry This is me
Türkiye

Fatma Bursalı This is me
Türkiye

Nourtzan Kechagıa This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 8, 2018

Submission Date

February 14, 2018

Acceptance Date

March 13, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Sadry, S., Bursalı, F., & Kechagıa, N. (2018). TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydın Dental Journal, 4(1), 29-34. https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE
AMA
1.Sadry S, Bursalı F, Kechagıa N. TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydin Dental Journal. 2018;4(1):29-34. https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE
Chicago
Sadry, Sanaz, Fatma Bursalı, and Nourtzan Kechagıa. 2018. “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”. Aydın Dental Journal 4 (1): 29-34. https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE.
EndNote
Sadry S, Bursalı F, Kechagıa N (April 1, 2018) TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydın Dental Journal 4 1 29–34.
IEEE
[1]S. Sadry, F. Bursalı, and N. Kechagıa, “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”, Aydin Dental Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–34, Apr. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE
ISNAD
Sadry, Sanaz - Bursalı, Fatma - Kechagıa, Nourtzan. “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”. Aydın Dental Journal 4/1 (April 1, 2018): 29-34. https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE.
JAMA
1.Sadry S, Bursalı F, Kechagıa N. TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydin Dental Journal. 2018;4:29–34.
MLA
Sadry, Sanaz, et al. “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”. Aydın Dental Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, Apr. 2018, pp. 29-34, https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE.
Vancouver
1.Sanaz Sadry, Fatma Bursalı, Nourtzan Kechagıa. TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION II MALOCCLUSION WITH ACTIVATOR AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydin Dental Journal [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 1;4(1):29-34. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA39ZP54KE

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)