Tİ-BASE DAYANAKLAR KULLANILARAK DİJİTAL ÖLÇÜ İLE HAZIRLANAN RESTORASYONLAR-OLGU SUNUMU
Year 2023,
Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 113 - 121, 31.08.2023
Göknur Öztürk
,
Değer Öngül
Abstract
Diş eksikliğine bağlı kaybolan estetiğin, fonksiyonun, fonasyonun geri kazanımı için implant tedavileri diş hekimliğinde sıklıkla uygulanmaktadır. Bu tedavi protokolünde tedavinin her adımı uzun dönemde başarıyı etkilemektedir. Uygun dayanağın ve protetik materyalin seçilmesi, ölçünün doğru şekilde alınması başarıyı etkileyen adımlardandır. Bu olgu sunumunda, implant iyileşme dönemini takiben, uygun ti-base dayanaklar seçilip dijital ölçü ile hastanın protetik tedavi süreci tamamlanmıştır. Birbirinden farklı çalışmalarda farklı dayanaklar seçilerek protetik tedavi süreci tamamlanmış olsa da amaç, hastanın mevcut durumu göz önüne alınarak uygun dayanağın seçilmesi ve ölçünün doğruluğunun sağlanmasıdır.
Supporting Institution
İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü - Protetik Diş Tedavisi
Thanks
İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü ve İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi A.B.D.'na teşekkürler.
References
- Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 1st ed. St. Louis
Missouri: Mosby; 2005. p.32-41.
- Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza Edos S.
Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants
reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of
at least 10 years: a systematic review. International journal
of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2015;44(3):377-88.
- Aykent F, Özdoğan MS, Soğancı G. [Occlu- sion of
implant supported prostheses]. Turkiye Klinikleri J
Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2017;3(1):13-21.
- Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw versus Cementretained
implant restoration: current concepts. Implant
Dent 2010;19(1):8-15.
- Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screwretained
implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion
and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent
1997;77(1):28-35.
- Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP, Bragger U. Screw
retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed
dental prosthesis. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73(1):141-
151.
- Staubli N, Walter C, schmidt JC, Weiger R, Zitzmann
NU. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease–a
systematic rewiew. Clinical oral implants research. 2017;
28(10): 1278-1290.
- Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene
V, The influence of margin location on the amount of
undetected cement excess after delivery of cementretained
implant restorations. Clinical oral implants
research. 2011;22(12):1379-1384.
- Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical
performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed
implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.
2014;29 Suppl:84- 98.
- Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini
JP. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cementand
screw-retained implant restorations: A multi-center,
3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:
375-379.
- Cardoso KB, Bergamo ETP, Cruz VM, Ramalho
IS, Lino LFO, Bonfante EA. Three-dimensional misfit
between Ti-base abutments and implants evaluated by
replica technique. J Appl Oral Sci 2020;28: e20200343.
- Burkhardt F, Pitta J, Fehmer V, Mojon P, Sailer
I. Retention forces of monolithic CAD/CAM crowns
adhesively cemented to titanium base abutments-effect of
saliva contamination followed by cleaning of the titanium
bond surface. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(12): 3375.
- TP Bergamo E, Zahoui A, Luri Amorin Ikejiri L, etal.
Retentionof zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect
of luting protocol, abutment treatment and autoclave
sterilization. J Prosthodont Res 2021; 65(02):171-175.
- Corvino E, Pesce P, Mura R, Marcano E, Canullo
L. Influence of modified titanium abutment surface on
peri-implant soft tis- sue behavior: a systematic review
of in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
2020;35(3):503-519.
- Richi MW, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O. Comparison
of the accuracy of different impression procedures in
case of multiple and angulated implants. Head Face Med.
2020;16(1):1-12.
- Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression
Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am
2017;61(4):779-96.
- Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant
prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral
Implants Res 2015; 26: 1430-5.
- Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry:
An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM
generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505-11.
- Bilmenoglu C, Cilingir A, Geckili O, Bilhan H,
Bilgin T. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral
scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental
prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2020;1-6.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-Arch dental
impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and
precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; Feb;109(2): 12-18.
- Korsch M, Marten S-M, Walther W, Vital M, Pieper
DH, Impact of dental cement on the peri-implant biofilmmicrobial
comparison of two different cements in an in
vivo observational study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
2018;20(5):806-813.
- Hsiao C-C, Liang C-H, Shen Y-F, Hsu K-W.
Retrospective com- parison of posterior fixed dental prostheses supported by two different titanium abutments on tissue level implants. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125(6):877-882
- Corvino E, Pesce P, Mura R, Marcano E, Canullo L.
Influence of modified titanium abutment surface on periimplant
soft tis- sue behavior: a systematic review of in
vitro
- Cardoso KB, Bergamo ET, Cruz VD, Ramalho I S,
Lino LF, Bonfante EA. Three-dimensional misfit between
Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica
technique. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28: 388-94.
- Joda T, Ferrari M, Brägger U. Monolithic implantsupported
lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete
digital work- flow: a prospective clinical trial with a 2-year
follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19(3):505-
511
- Al-Thobity AM. Titanium Base Abutments in Implant
Prosthodontics: A Literature Review. Eur J Dent. 2022
Feb;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735423. Epub
2021 Nov 18. PMID: 34794201; PMCID: PMC8890922.
- Gomez-Meda R, Esquivel J, Blatz MB. The esthetic
biological contour concept for implant restoration
emergence profile design. J Esthet Restor Dent
2021;33(1):173-184.
- Martínez-Rus F, Prieto M, Salido MP, Madrigal C,
Özcan M, Pradíes G. A clinical study assessing the influence
of anodized titanium and zirconium dioxide abutments and
peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the optical outcome
of implant-supported lithium disilicate single crowns. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32(1):156-163.
- Steigmann M, Monje A, Chan H-L, Wang H-L.
Emergence pro- file design based on implant position
in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
2014;34(4):559-563.
- Chandran Sk, Jaını J, Babu As, Mathew A,
Keepanasserıl A. Digital versus conventional impressions
in dentistry: A systematic review. J Clin Diagnostic Res
2019;13.
Year 2023,
Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 113 - 121, 31.08.2023
Göknur Öztürk
,
Değer Öngül
References
- Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 1st ed. St. Louis
Missouri: Mosby; 2005. p.32-41.
- Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza Edos S.
Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants
reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of
at least 10 years: a systematic review. International journal
of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2015;44(3):377-88.
- Aykent F, Özdoğan MS, Soğancı G. [Occlu- sion of
implant supported prostheses]. Turkiye Klinikleri J
Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2017;3(1):13-21.
- Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw versus Cementretained
implant restoration: current concepts. Implant
Dent 2010;19(1):8-15.
- Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screwretained
implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion
and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent
1997;77(1):28-35.
- Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP, Bragger U. Screw
retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed
dental prosthesis. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73(1):141-
151.
- Staubli N, Walter C, schmidt JC, Weiger R, Zitzmann
NU. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease–a
systematic rewiew. Clinical oral implants research. 2017;
28(10): 1278-1290.
- Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene
V, The influence of margin location on the amount of
undetected cement excess after delivery of cementretained
implant restorations. Clinical oral implants
research. 2011;22(12):1379-1384.
- Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical
performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed
implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.
2014;29 Suppl:84- 98.
- Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini
JP. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cementand
screw-retained implant restorations: A multi-center,
3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:
375-379.
- Cardoso KB, Bergamo ETP, Cruz VM, Ramalho
IS, Lino LFO, Bonfante EA. Three-dimensional misfit
between Ti-base abutments and implants evaluated by
replica technique. J Appl Oral Sci 2020;28: e20200343.
- Burkhardt F, Pitta J, Fehmer V, Mojon P, Sailer
I. Retention forces of monolithic CAD/CAM crowns
adhesively cemented to titanium base abutments-effect of
saliva contamination followed by cleaning of the titanium
bond surface. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(12): 3375.
- TP Bergamo E, Zahoui A, Luri Amorin Ikejiri L, etal.
Retentionof zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect
of luting protocol, abutment treatment and autoclave
sterilization. J Prosthodont Res 2021; 65(02):171-175.
- Corvino E, Pesce P, Mura R, Marcano E, Canullo
L. Influence of modified titanium abutment surface on
peri-implant soft tis- sue behavior: a systematic review
of in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
2020;35(3):503-519.
- Richi MW, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O. Comparison
of the accuracy of different impression procedures in
case of multiple and angulated implants. Head Face Med.
2020;16(1):1-12.
- Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression
Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am
2017;61(4):779-96.
- Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant
prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral
Implants Res 2015; 26: 1430-5.
- Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry:
An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM
generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505-11.
- Bilmenoglu C, Cilingir A, Geckili O, Bilhan H,
Bilgin T. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral
scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental
prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2020;1-6.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-Arch dental
impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and
precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; Feb;109(2): 12-18.
- Korsch M, Marten S-M, Walther W, Vital M, Pieper
DH, Impact of dental cement on the peri-implant biofilmmicrobial
comparison of two different cements in an in
vivo observational study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
2018;20(5):806-813.
- Hsiao C-C, Liang C-H, Shen Y-F, Hsu K-W.
Retrospective com- parison of posterior fixed dental prostheses supported by two different titanium abutments on tissue level implants. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125(6):877-882
- Corvino E, Pesce P, Mura R, Marcano E, Canullo L.
Influence of modified titanium abutment surface on periimplant
soft tis- sue behavior: a systematic review of in
vitro
- Cardoso KB, Bergamo ET, Cruz VD, Ramalho I S,
Lino LF, Bonfante EA. Three-dimensional misfit between
Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica
technique. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28: 388-94.
- Joda T, Ferrari M, Brägger U. Monolithic implantsupported
lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete
digital work- flow: a prospective clinical trial with a 2-year
follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19(3):505-
511
- Al-Thobity AM. Titanium Base Abutments in Implant
Prosthodontics: A Literature Review. Eur J Dent. 2022
Feb;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735423. Epub
2021 Nov 18. PMID: 34794201; PMCID: PMC8890922.
- Gomez-Meda R, Esquivel J, Blatz MB. The esthetic
biological contour concept for implant restoration
emergence profile design. J Esthet Restor Dent
2021;33(1):173-184.
- Martínez-Rus F, Prieto M, Salido MP, Madrigal C,
Özcan M, Pradíes G. A clinical study assessing the influence
of anodized titanium and zirconium dioxide abutments and
peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the optical outcome
of implant-supported lithium disilicate single crowns. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32(1):156-163.
- Steigmann M, Monje A, Chan H-L, Wang H-L.
Emergence pro- file design based on implant position
in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
2014;34(4):559-563.
- Chandran Sk, Jaını J, Babu As, Mathew A,
Keepanasserıl A. Digital versus conventional impressions
in dentistry: A systematic review. J Clin Diagnostic Res
2019;13.