Kan Lekesi Model Analizi

Abstract

Kan ölümle sonuçlansın ya da sonuçlanmasın her türlü şiddet suçlarının araştırılmasında en sık kullanılan ve en belirgin olan fiziksel delillerden birisidir. Şiddet suçlarının doğası gereği sıklıkla oluşan kan lekelerinin geometri ve dağılımlarının dikkatli bir şekilde değerlendirilmesi ile olay hakkında çok değerli bilgiler elde edilebileceği gibi olayın yeniden kurgulanması da mümkün olacaktır. Bu çalışmada kan lekesi analizinin tarihsel geçmişi yanında kullandığı terminoloji, dayandığı esaslar, kullanım alanı ve fonksiyonu sunulmuştur.

Keywords

• Kan lekesi modeli
• Kan lekesinin değerlendirilmesi
• Olay yeri

References

1. Deforest PT, Lee HL, Gaensslen RE. Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983:306-8.
2. Bevel T, Gardner RM. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis-An Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction. Boca Raton : CRC Pres, 1997: 2.
3. Bevel T. Geometric Bloodstain Interpretation. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.1983;5:7- 10.
4. James SH, Eckert WG. Interpretation of Bloodstain Evidence at Crime Scenes. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1999:3-10.
5. Kirk PL. Crime Investigation. Second ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974: 148-56.
6. MacDonell HL. Criminalistics,Bloodstain Examination. Forensic Sciences.1981; 3: 35-8.
7. Sutton TP. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis in Violent Crimes. Memphis: Universty of Tennessee,1993:56-8.
8. MacDonell HL, Panchau C. Bloodstain Patterns on Human Skin. J Canadian Society Forensic Sci, 1979; 12(3):134-41.

9. Stuart HJ,editor. Scientific and Legal Applications of Bloodstain Pattern Interpretation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1999:4-14.
10. MacDonell HL. Bloodstain Patterns. New York: Golos Printing Inc., 1993:15.
11. Pex JO, Vaughn CH. Observations of High Velocity Blood Spatter on Adjacent Objects. J Forensic Sci, 1987;32(6):1587-94.
12. Pizzola PA, Roth S, DeForest PR. Blood Droplet Dynamics-I. J Forensic Sci, 1986; 31(1):36-49
13. Pizzola PA, Roth S, DeForest PR. Blood Droplet Dynamics-II. J Forensic Sci, 1986; 31(1):50-64.
14. Laber TL. Diameter of a Bloodstain as a Function of Origin, Distance Fallen and Volume of Drop. IABPA News, 1985;2(1):12-6.
15. White RB. Bloodstain Patterns of Fabrics-The Effect of Drop Volume, Dropping Height and Impact Angle. J Canadian Society Forensic Sci, 1986; 19(1):3-36.
16. MacDonnell H, Bialousz LF. Flight Characteristics and Stain Patterns of Human Blood , National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice,LEAA Report PR-71,US Goverment Printing Office,Washington,DC,1971;21.
17. Laber TL, Epstein BP. Experiments and Practical Exercises in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis, Minnesota,1983;38.
18. Stephens BG, Allen TB. Back Spatter of Blood from Gunshot Wounds-Obsevations and Experimental Simulations. J Forensic Sci, 1983;28(2):437-9.
19. Chafe F. Determination of Impact Angle Using Mathematical Properties of the Ellipse. IABPA News, 2003;19(1)5-9.
20. Thomas JM. A Laser Angle Gauge for Use in Stringing Blood Patterns. IABPA News, 2002;18(3)9-12.
21. Eikelenboom R. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: The Professional Approach. 3rd. European Academy of Forensic Science Meeting, 2003, İstanbul;Turkey.
22. Lewis J, Hammond R. Bloodstain Pattern Arising in Physical Assaults-The value of Reconstraction. 3rd. European Academy of Forensic Science Meeting, 2003, İstanbul;Turkey.
23. Hurley M, Pex J. Sequencing of Bloody Shoe Impressions by Blood Spatter and Blood Droplet Drying Times,IABPA News, 1990;3 (2) 34-6.
24. Lee Henry C, Gaensslen RE, Paglario Elaine M.,Bloodstain Volume Estimation, IABPA News, 1986;3(2):.47-55.
25. Cheatham CS. A National Survey of Police Exposure to Bloodstain Pattern Analysis, IABPA News, 2003;19(2)4-14.