Review
Year 2013,
Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 64 - 68, 31.08.2013
Abstract
Adli bilimler disiplini içerisinde kalite güvenliği, sonuçların
adalet sisteminde verilen kararı
etkilemesi açısından önemli rol
oynamaktadır. Adli toksikolojik
analizlerde araştırmaların kalitesini güvence altına almak için
Avrupa’da, Amerika’da ve tüm
dünyada tanınan profesyonel
kuruluşlar tarafından standartlar ve kılavuzlar hazırlanmıştır.
Bu çalışma adli toksikoloji laboratuvarı için var olan standartlara ve kılavuzlar hakkında genel
bir bakış açısı sağlamak üzere
hazırlanmıştır. Bu kılavuzlar
personel, numune, laboratuvar organizasyonu, laboratuvar
analiz prosedürleri, kalite güvencesi/kontrolü ve sonuçların
yorumlanması şeklinde 7 ana
bölümü içermektedir. Kılavuzda yer alan öneriler her laboratuvara uygun değildir. Ancak
bu öneriler gelecek hedeflerini
başarmada, adli toksikoloji sahasında çalışan laboratuvarlara
yardımcı olacaktır.
References
- Battista HJ, Meyer LV, Wehinger G. Quality assurance in forensic toxicological analysis. Accred Qual Assur 1996;1:201-6.
- Penders J, Verstraete A. Laboratory guidelines and standards in clinical and forensic toxicology. Accred Qual Assur 2006;11:284-90.
- Berte LM. Laboratory quality management: a roadmap. Clin Lab Med 2007;27: 771-90.
- SOFT/AAFS Forensic Laboratory Guidelines. Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Guidelines. 2006 Version.
- Cooper GAA, Paterson S, Osselton MD. The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists. Forensic toxicology laboratory guidelines(2010). Science and Justice 2010;50:166-76
- Li H, Adeli K. Laboratory quality regulations and accreditation standards in Canada. Clinical Biochemistry 2009;42:249-55.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA): Division of Workplace Programs. Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Specimen Validity Testing, 2005.
- AGSA. Drugs of Abuse Testing Guidelines, 2006.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA): Division of Workplace Programs. Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Analytical Testing methods, 2010.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Guidance for testing of illicit drugs in seized materials and biological specimens: validation and verification of analytical methods. New York, 2009:5- 38.
- Wille SMR, Peters FT, Fazio VD, Samyn N. Practical aspects concerning validation and quality control for forensic and clinical bioanalytical quantative methods. Accred Qual Assur 2011;16:279-92.
- Mozayani A, Noziglia C. The Forensic Laboratory Handbook Procedures and Practice. Second Edition, Humana Pres, 2011:335-55.
- Bissell MG. Regulatory issues in accreditation of toxicology laboratories. Clin Lab Med 2012;32:525-42.
Year 2013,
Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 64 - 68, 31.08.2013
Abstract
References
- Battista HJ, Meyer LV, Wehinger G. Quality assurance in forensic toxicological analysis. Accred Qual Assur 1996;1:201-6.
- Penders J, Verstraete A. Laboratory guidelines and standards in clinical and forensic toxicology. Accred Qual Assur 2006;11:284-90.
- Berte LM. Laboratory quality management: a roadmap. Clin Lab Med 2007;27: 771-90.
- SOFT/AAFS Forensic Laboratory Guidelines. Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Guidelines. 2006 Version.
- Cooper GAA, Paterson S, Osselton MD. The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists. Forensic toxicology laboratory guidelines(2010). Science and Justice 2010;50:166-76
- Li H, Adeli K. Laboratory quality regulations and accreditation standards in Canada. Clinical Biochemistry 2009;42:249-55.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA): Division of Workplace Programs. Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Specimen Validity Testing, 2005.
- AGSA. Drugs of Abuse Testing Guidelines, 2006.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA): Division of Workplace Programs. Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Analytical Testing methods, 2010.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Guidance for testing of illicit drugs in seized materials and biological specimens: validation and verification of analytical methods. New York, 2009:5- 38.
- Wille SMR, Peters FT, Fazio VD, Samyn N. Practical aspects concerning validation and quality control for forensic and clinical bioanalytical quantative methods. Accred Qual Assur 2011;16:279-92.
- Mozayani A, Noziglia C. The Forensic Laboratory Handbook Procedures and Practice. Second Edition, Humana Pres, 2011:335-55.
- Bissell MG. Regulatory issues in accreditation of toxicology laboratories. Clin Lab Med 2012;32:525-42.
There are 13 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Forensic Biology |
| Journal Section | Review |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | August 1, 2012 |
| Publication Date | August 31, 2013 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA66DH64LF |
| Published in Issue | Year 2013 Volume: 27 Issue: 2 |
Turkish Journal of Forensic Medicine is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy, and no fees will be charged from the authors at any stage of the publication for the articles submitted.