Evaluating the reliability of YouTube videos about Primary Herpetic Gingivostomatitis

Yıl 2024, , 77 - 86, 26.01.2024

Özlem Saraç Atagün , Dinemis Alev Altuntaş , Gülbahar Ustaoğlu , Seval Ceylan Şen

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1317396

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the information included in YouTubeTM videos regarding Primary Herpetic Gingivostomatitis (PHGS).
Material and Method: The term PHGS were typed into the search bar on YouTubeTM (www.YouTube.com), and the first 300 videos were scanned. Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score (a modified DISCERN tool), two social media video content evaluation methods, were used to assess the reliability and quality of the included videos. Each video's usefulness rating, source, duration, number of views, and likes were also recorded. The interaction index and viewing rates of videos were calculated.
Results: 69% of the videos were very useful, and the GQS scores were good (48.3%) and excellent (17.2 %) mostly. The popularity and visibility data of videos were not correlated with the video usefulness score, GQS, and DISCERN (p>0.05). Total DISCERN scores and GQS were corelated with usefulness scores of the videos (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Although the number of videos on YouTubeTM on PHGS is insufficient, their quality and reliability are high, regardless of the number of views, duration and likes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primary Herpetic Gingivostomatitis, Reliability, YouTube

Primer Herpetik Gingivostomatit ile ilgili YouTube videolarının güvenilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Primer Herpetik Gingivostomatitis (PHGS) ile ilgili YouTubeTM videolarında yer alan bilgilerin doğruluğunu ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: YouTubeTM (www.YouTube.com) arama çubuğuna PHGS terimi yazıldı ve ilk 300 video tarandı. Dahil edilen videoların güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmek için iki sosyal medya video içeriği değerlendirme yöntemi olan Küresel Kalite Puanı (GQS) ve Güvenilirlik Puanı (modifiye DISCERN) kullanıldı. Her videonun yararlılık derecesi, kaynağı, süresi, izlenme sayısı ve beğenileri de kaydedildi. Videoların etkileşim endeksi ve izlenme oranları hesaplandı.
Bulgular: Videoların %69'u çok kullanışlıydı ve GQS puanları çoğunlukla iyi (%48,3) ve mükemmel (%17,2) idi. Videoların popülerlik ve görünürlük verileri video kullanışlılık puanı, GQS ve DISCERN ile ilişkili değildi (p>0.05). Toplam DISCERN puanları ve GQS, videoların kullanışlılık puanları ile korelasyon göstermiştir (p<0,05).
Sonuç: PHGS konusunda YouTube'daki videoların sayısı yetersiz olmakla birlikte izlenme sayısı, süresi ve beğenisinden bağımsız olarak kalite ve güvenirliliği yüksektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Güvenilirlik, Primer Herpetik Hingivostomatit, YouTube

Kaynakça

• Referans1. Kolokotronis A, Doumas S. Herpes simplex virus infection, with particular reference to the progression and complications of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:202-11.
• Referans2. Stoopler ET, Sollecito TP. Oral mucosal diseases: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am 2014;98:1323-52.
• Referans3. Thomas E. A complication of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis. Br Dent J 2007;203:33-4.
• Referans4. Cataldo F, Violante M, Maltese I, Traverso G, Paternostro D. [Herpetic gingivostomatitis in children: the clinico-epidemiological aspects and findings with acyclovir treatment. A report of the cases of 162 patients]. Pediatr Med Chir 1993;15:193-5.
• Referans5. Bardellini E, Amadori F, Veneri F, Conti G, Paderno A, Majorana A. Adolescents and primary herpetic gingivostomatitis: an Italian overview. Ir J Med Sci 2022;191:801-5.
• Referans6. Heliotis I, Whatling R, Desai S, Visavadia M. Primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in children. Bmj 2021;375:e065540.
• Referans7. Yarom N, Buchner A, Dayan D. Herpes simplex virus infection: part I--Biology, clinical presentation and latency. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2005;22:7-15.
• Referans8. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis 2016;22:196-201.
• Referans9. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899- 903.
• Referans10. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-8.
• Referans11. Morais EF, Felix FA, Santos J, Martins HDD, Barboza CAG, Freitas RA. YouTube™ and oral lichen planus: an appraisal of the educational quality of information. Braz Oral Res 2020;35:e006.
• Referans12. Topsakal KG, Duran GS, Görgülü S, Eser Misir S. Is YouTube(TM) an adequate source of oral hygiene education for orthodontic patients? Int J Dent Hyg 2022;20:504-11.
• Referans13. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105-11.
• Referans14. Tozar KN, Yapıcı Yavuz G. Reliability of information on YouTube™ regarding pediatric dental trauma. Dent Traumatol.2021;37:772-8.
• Referans15. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017;27:437-43.
• Referans16. Duman C. YouTube™ quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg 2020;18:261-7.
• Referans17. Kovalski LNS, Cardoso FB, D’Avila OP, Corrêa APB, Martins MAT, Martins MD, et al. Is the YouTube™ an useful source of information on oral leukoplakia? Oral Dis 2019;25:1897-905.
• Referans18. Göller Bulut D, Paksoy T, Ustaoğlu G. Is Online Video a Suitable Source to Obtain Sufficient and Useful Information About Peri-Implantitis? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023;81:56-64.
• Referans19. Gulve ND, Tripathi PR, Dahivelkar SD, Gulve MN, Gulve RN, Kolhe SJ. Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information About Oral Self-examination to Detect Oral Cancer and Precancerous Lesions. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2022;12:226-34.