Surface Properties of Dental Implants and Interactions With The Biological Enviroment: Part I: Tissue-Implant Interactions and Molecular Events
Year 2011,
Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 816 - 820, 01.04.2011
Yeliz Kılınç
Sara Samur Ergüven
Erkan Erkmen
Abstract
Osseointegration is defined as the direct aposition of bone matrix and osteoblasts to the implant surface without any intervening soft or fibrous tissue. The successful osseointegration of dental implants is achieved through complex interactions that take place at the boneimplant interface. Dental implant surface plays a key role in controlling these interface interactions. Surface properties directly affect various processes including protein adsorption, cell-surface interactions and cell/tissue development. In this paper current knowledge of the bone-implant interface is reviewed and basic molecular events are described
References
- Krause A., Cowles EA. Integrin-mediated signaling in osteoblasts on titanium implant materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 52: 738-747, 2000.
- Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: Clues for future improvements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 80: 439-449, 1998.
- Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endossous implants. J. Prosthet. Dent. 84: 522-534, 2000.
- Oshida Y. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials: Amsterdam: Elsevier BV, 2006, 8-97.
- Davies JE. Bone Engineering. Em Squared Inc., Toronto: 1999.
- Mano JF, Neves NM, Reis RL. Mechanical characterization of biomaterials:Reis RL, Roman JS. Biodegradable Systems in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. New York: CRC Press, 2005,152-175.
- Kasemo B., Gold J. Implant Surfaces and Interface Processes. Adv. Dent. Res. 13: 8-20, 1999.
- Puelo DA., Thomas MV. Implant Surfaces. Dent Clin N Am 50: 323-338, 2006.
- Horbett TA., Brash JL. Proteins at interfaces:current issues and future prospects. Brash JL, Horbett TA. Proteins at interfaces: physiochemical and biochemşcal studies. Washinghton: American Chemical Society, 1987, 1-33.
- Norde W. Driving forces for protein absorption at solid surfaces. Macromol. Symp. 103: 5-18, 1996.
- Israelachvili J.,Wennerstorm H. Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions. Nature 379: 219-225, 1996.
- Elias CN., Oshida Y., Lima JH., Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties(roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 1:234-242, 2008.
- Yoshinari M., Oda Y., Inoue T., Shimono M. Dry- process surface modification for titanium dental implants. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 33:511-519, 2002.
- Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: clues for future clinical improvements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 80:439-449, 1998.
- Stanford CM., Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J. Prosthet. Dent. 81:553-61, 1999.
Dental İmplant Yüzey Özellikleri ve Biyolojik Ortamla Etkileşimler: Bölüm I: Doku İmplant Etkileşimleri ve Moleküler Olaylar
Year 2011,
Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 816 - 820, 01.04.2011
Yeliz Kılınç
Sara Samur Ergüven
Erkan Erkmen
Abstract
Osseointegrasyon kemik matriksi ve osteoblastların implant yüzeyine yumuşak yada fibröz doku araya girmeksizin doğrudan apozisyonu olarak tanımlanmaktadır. osseointegrasyonu kemik implant arayüzeyinde gerçekleşen kompleks etkileşimler ile sağlanmaktadır. Dental implant yüzeyi arayüzey reaksiyonlarının kontrol edilmesinde anahtar bir role sahiptir. Yüzey özellikleri protein absorbsiyonu, hücre-yüzey etkileşimleri ve hücre-doku gelişimi gibi çeşitli süreçlere etki etmektedir. Bu makalede kemik implant yüzeyi ile ilgili güncel bilgiler gözden geçirilmiş ve temel moleküler olaylar açıklanmıştır
References
- Krause A., Cowles EA. Integrin-mediated signaling in osteoblasts on titanium implant materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 52: 738-747, 2000.
- Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: Clues for future improvements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 80: 439-449, 1998.
- Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endossous implants. J. Prosthet. Dent. 84: 522-534, 2000.
- Oshida Y. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials: Amsterdam: Elsevier BV, 2006, 8-97.
- Davies JE. Bone Engineering. Em Squared Inc., Toronto: 1999.
- Mano JF, Neves NM, Reis RL. Mechanical characterization of biomaterials:Reis RL, Roman JS. Biodegradable Systems in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. New York: CRC Press, 2005,152-175.
- Kasemo B., Gold J. Implant Surfaces and Interface Processes. Adv. Dent. Res. 13: 8-20, 1999.
- Puelo DA., Thomas MV. Implant Surfaces. Dent Clin N Am 50: 323-338, 2006.
- Horbett TA., Brash JL. Proteins at interfaces:current issues and future prospects. Brash JL, Horbett TA. Proteins at interfaces: physiochemical and biochemşcal studies. Washinghton: American Chemical Society, 1987, 1-33.
- Norde W. Driving forces for protein absorption at solid surfaces. Macromol. Symp. 103: 5-18, 1996.
- Israelachvili J.,Wennerstorm H. Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions. Nature 379: 219-225, 1996.
- Elias CN., Oshida Y., Lima JH., Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties(roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 1:234-242, 2008.
- Yoshinari M., Oda Y., Inoue T., Shimono M. Dry- process surface modification for titanium dental implants. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 33:511-519, 2002.
- Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: clues for future clinical improvements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 80:439-449, 1998.
- Stanford CM., Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J. Prosthet. Dent. 81:553-61, 1999.