Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yeni geliştirilen bir kompozit rezin materyalinin bükülme dayanımının karşılaştırılmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi: Bir in vitro çalışma

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 220 - 224, 19.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1109155

Abstract

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmada Mikrohibrid doldurucu içeriği ile yeni geliştirilen bir dental kompozitin mekanik özelliklerinden bükülme dayanımının iki farklı mikrohibrit dolduruculu kompozit materyal ile karşılaştırılmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Mevcut çalışmada, yeni üretilen bir Üniversal Kompozit (Dolgunn, Himg Seramik ve Medikal Kompozit San.Tic. Ltd.Sti, Türkiye) ile 2 farklı mikrohibrit kompozit (G- aenial Anterior, GC-Japonya ve Filtek Z250 3M, USA) kullanıldı. Her bir dolgu materyalinden 10 adet dikdörtgenler prizması şeklinde (2x2x25 mm boyutunda) örnekler hazırlanarak, instron test cihazında 1 mm/dk hızda bükülme dayanım değerleri ölçüldü. Verilerin istatistiksel analiz için Kruskal-Wallis testi kullanıldı. Tüm testler için istatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p=0.05 alındı.
Bulgular: Tüm test materyalleri arasında bükülme dayanımları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar gözlendi (p<0.05). En yüksek bükülme dayanımı değerini Filtek Z250 gösterirken en düşük bükülme dayanım değerini G-aenial materyali göstermiştir. G-aenial ve Dolgunn materyalleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklıklar bulunmazken; her iki materyal ile Filtek Z250 arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarına göre yeni geliştirilmiş olan Dolgunn kompozit dolgu materyali değerlendirilen diğer mikrohibrit kompozitlerden birinden daha yüksek ancak yakın diğerinden daha düşük değerlerde bükülme dayanımı değerleri göstermiştir. Kullanılan tüm materyallerin öngörülen standartların üzerinde bükülme dayanım değerlerine sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Yeni geliştirilen formülasyona sahip kompozit materyalinin daha kapsamlı mekanik testler ile değerlendirilmesi yönünde öncü bir çalışma olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Supporting Institution

Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp ve Sağlık Bilimleri Araştırma Kurulu

Project Number

D-KA22/08

References

  • Ruyter IE, Oeysaed H. Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21: 11-23.
  • Altun C. Kompozit dolgu materyallerinde son gelişmeler. Gülhane Med J 2005; 47: 77-82.
  • Fugolın APP, Pfeıfer CS. New resins for dental composites. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 1085-91
  • Turssi C, Ferracane J, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4932-7.
  • Ünlü N, Çetin AR. New Developments in Ingredient of Composite Resin Materials: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2008; 14: 156-67.
  • Yeli M, Kidiyoor KH, Nain B, Kumar P. Recent advances in composite resins-A review. J Oral Res Rev 2010; 2:134-6.
  • Pala K, Tekce N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Oznurhan F, Serim M. Flexural strength and microhardness of anterior composites after accelerated aging. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9: 424-30.
  • Alander P, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Acoustic emission analysis of fiber-reinforced composite in flexural testing. Dent Mater J 2004; 20: 305-12.
  • Ilie N, Hilton TJ, Heintze SD, Hickel R, Watts DC, Silikas N et al. Academy of dental materials guidance—Resin composites: Part I—Mechanical properties. Dent Mater J 2017;33: 880-94.
  • Wilson NHF, Norman RD. Five-year findings of a multicentre clinical trial for a posterior composite. J Dent. 1991;19:153–9.
  • International Standards, Organization ISO 4049. Dentistry—Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. 2000.
  • Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Chandra SP, Lim CT. Flexural strength of dental composite restoratives: Comparison of biaxial and threepoint bending test. J App Biomaterials 2004; 71: 278- 83.
  • Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 642-9.
  • Gladys S, Van MB, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76: 883–94.
  • Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Domarecka M, Kopacz K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins. Materials 2021; 14: 2727.
  • Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:442-6.
  • Xu HH, Smith DT, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Antonucci JM. Indentation modulus and hardness of whisker-reinforced heat-cured dental resin composites. Dent Mater J 2000;16: 248-54.
  • Klymus ME, Shinkai RS, MotaEG, Oshima MS, Spohr AM, Burnett LH. Influence of the mechanical properties of composites for indirect dental restorations on pattern failure. Stomatologija 2007; 9: 56-60.
  • Manhart J Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mat Res 2000, 53: 353-61.
  • Manhart J Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dental Assoc 2001, 132: 639- 45.
  • Barszczewska-Rybarek, I.M. A guide through the dental dimethacrylate polymer network structural characterization and interpretation of physico-mechanical properties. Materials 2019; 12: 4057.
  • Oshida Y, Zuccari AG. On the three-point flexural tests of dental polymeric resins. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:111-9.

Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of a newly developed composite resin material: An in vitro study.

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 220 - 224, 19.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1109155

Abstract

Aim: In this in vitro study, it was aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of a newly developed dental composite material with microhybrid filler content and its flexural strength comparatively with two different microhybrid filler composite materials.
Material and Methods:
In the current study, the newly produced Universal Composite filling material (Dolgunn, Himg Seramik ve Medikal Kompozit San.Tic. Ltd.Sti, Turkey) and 2 different microhybrid composite materials (G-aenial Anterior, GC-Japan and Filtek Z250 3M, USA) were used. Ten rectangular prisms (2x2x25 mm in size) samples were prepared from each filling material, and the bending strength values were measured at a speed of 1 mm/min in an instron test device. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis of the data. Statistical significance level was taken as p=0.05 for all tests.
Results: Differences were observed between the materials in terms of flexural strengths (p<0.05). Filtek Z250 showed the highest flexural strength value, while G-aenial material showed the lowest value. While there was no statistically significant difference between G-aenial and Dolgunn materials, a difference was found between both materials and Filtek Z250.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, the newly developed Dolgunn composite filling material showed higher flexural strength values than one of the other microhybrid composites evaluated but lower than the other close ones. It has been observed that all materials used have flexural strength values above the prescribed standards. It is thought that it will be a pioneering study in the evaluation of the newly developed composite material with more comprehensive mechanical tests.

Project Number

D-KA22/08

References

  • Ruyter IE, Oeysaed H. Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21: 11-23.
  • Altun C. Kompozit dolgu materyallerinde son gelişmeler. Gülhane Med J 2005; 47: 77-82.
  • Fugolın APP, Pfeıfer CS. New resins for dental composites. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 1085-91
  • Turssi C, Ferracane J, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4932-7.
  • Ünlü N, Çetin AR. New Developments in Ingredient of Composite Resin Materials: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2008; 14: 156-67.
  • Yeli M, Kidiyoor KH, Nain B, Kumar P. Recent advances in composite resins-A review. J Oral Res Rev 2010; 2:134-6.
  • Pala K, Tekce N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Oznurhan F, Serim M. Flexural strength and microhardness of anterior composites after accelerated aging. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9: 424-30.
  • Alander P, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Acoustic emission analysis of fiber-reinforced composite in flexural testing. Dent Mater J 2004; 20: 305-12.
  • Ilie N, Hilton TJ, Heintze SD, Hickel R, Watts DC, Silikas N et al. Academy of dental materials guidance—Resin composites: Part I—Mechanical properties. Dent Mater J 2017;33: 880-94.
  • Wilson NHF, Norman RD. Five-year findings of a multicentre clinical trial for a posterior composite. J Dent. 1991;19:153–9.
  • International Standards, Organization ISO 4049. Dentistry—Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. 2000.
  • Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Chandra SP, Lim CT. Flexural strength of dental composite restoratives: Comparison of biaxial and threepoint bending test. J App Biomaterials 2004; 71: 278- 83.
  • Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 642-9.
  • Gladys S, Van MB, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76: 883–94.
  • Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Domarecka M, Kopacz K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins. Materials 2021; 14: 2727.
  • Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:442-6.
  • Xu HH, Smith DT, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Antonucci JM. Indentation modulus and hardness of whisker-reinforced heat-cured dental resin composites. Dent Mater J 2000;16: 248-54.
  • Klymus ME, Shinkai RS, MotaEG, Oshima MS, Spohr AM, Burnett LH. Influence of the mechanical properties of composites for indirect dental restorations on pattern failure. Stomatologija 2007; 9: 56-60.
  • Manhart J Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mat Res 2000, 53: 353-61.
  • Manhart J Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dental Assoc 2001, 132: 639- 45.
  • Barszczewska-Rybarek, I.M. A guide through the dental dimethacrylate polymer network structural characterization and interpretation of physico-mechanical properties. Materials 2019; 12: 4057.
  • Oshida Y, Zuccari AG. On the three-point flexural tests of dental polymeric resins. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:111-9.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Araştırma Makalesi
Authors

Güler Burcu Senirkentli 0000-0003-4918-5504

Yeşim Turan 0000-0002-8230-2728

Ezgi Sonkaya 0000-0001-9773-0955

Eda Çakmak 0000-0002-1548-4314

Ebru Tirali 0000-0001-6487-3984

Project Number D-KA22/08
Publication Date September 19, 2022
Submission Date April 26, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Senirkentli GB, Turan Y, Sonkaya E, Çakmak E, Tirali E. Yeni geliştirilen bir kompozit rezin materyalinin bükülme dayanımının karşılaştırılmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi: Bir in vitro çalışma. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2022;11(3):220-4.