Erratum

Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs

Volume: 11 Number: 2 December 28, 2022
EN

Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs

The original article was published on June 28, 2022. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/aduveterinary/article/1104696

Erratum Note

Tablo3 metin içine eklenmiştir.

Abstract

In this study, 42 adult dogs, comprised of 25 males and 17 females, with 18 different morphological types from the heterogeneous population were used. A total of 4 osteometric measurements of the femur and tibia were taken. After calculating the mean and standard deviation values of 42 adult dogs (SPSS 21.0 program), the T-test was applied to observe the significance of the difference between the mean values of both sexes. Correlations were observed between osteometric measurements of the femur and tibia. As a result, regression formulations were created to make independent estimations of both the femur “greatest breadth of the distal end” and tibia “greatest breadth of the proximal end”. The formulations formed had a high specificity value (R2). Hence, while sexual dimorphism was not observed on the measurements, the data produced in this study will contribute to the knee joint operations as well as to the identification of the same individual in mass burial contexts in zooarchaeological studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Aertsens, A., Alvarez, J.R., Poncet, C.M., Beaufrère, H., Rgetly, G.R. (2015). Comparison of the tibia plateau angle between small and large dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 28, 385–390. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-14-12-0180
  2. Agostinho, F.S., Rahal, S.C., Miqueleto, N.S.M.L., Verdugo, M.R., Inamassu, L.R., El-Warrak, A.O. (2011). Kinematic analysis of Labrador retrievers and Rottweilers trotting on a treadmill. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 24, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-10-03-0039
  3. Altunatmaz, K., Eravcı-Yalın, E., İnal-Günay, B., Şadalak-Mckinstry, D.J., Sevim, Z.T. (2019). Treatment with custom partial condyle prosthesis of a comminuted femoral condyle fracture in a dog: a case report. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 43, 140-145. doi:10.3906/vet-1807-115
  4. Anderson, J.F., Hall-Martin, A., Russell, D.A., (1985). Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds, and dinosaurs. Jornal of Zoology, 207, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04915.x
  5. Anyonge, W., (1993). Body mass in large extant and extinct carnivores. Journal of Zoology, 1993; 231: 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb01922.x
  6. Bahadır, A., Yıldız, H. (2010). Veteriner Anatomi. Hareket Sistemi ve İç Organlar. Ezgi Kitabevi. Bursa.
  7. Barrett, E., Barr, F., Owen, M., Bradley, K. (2009). A retrospective study of the MRI findings in 18 dogs with stifle injuries. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 50, 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00822.x
  8. Boge, G.S., Moldal, E.R., Dimopoulou, M., Skjerve, E., Bregström, A. (2019). Breed susceptibility for common surgically treated orthopaedic diseases in 12 dog breeds. Acta Veterinari Scandinavica, 61, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0454-4

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Sciences

Journal Section

Erratum

Publication Date

December 28, 2022

Submission Date

April 16, 2022

Acceptance Date

May 23, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 11 Number: 2

APA
Kartal, M., & Alpak, H. (2022). Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, 11(2), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696
AMA
1.Kartal M, Alpak H. Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs. Animal Health, Prod and Hyg. 2022;11(2):66-71. doi:10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696
Chicago
Kartal, Mehmet, and Hasan Alpak. 2022. “Morphometric Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia of the Dogs”. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 11 (2): 66-71. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696.
EndNote
Kartal M, Alpak H (December 1, 2022) Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 11 2 66–71.
IEEE
[1]M. Kartal and H. Alpak, “Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs”, Animal Health, Prod and Hyg, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 66–71, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696.
ISNAD
Kartal, Mehmet - Alpak, Hasan. “Morphometric Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia of the Dogs”. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 11/2 (December 1, 2022): 66-71. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696.
JAMA
1.Kartal M, Alpak H. Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs. Animal Health, Prod and Hyg. 2022;11:66–71.
MLA
Kartal, Mehmet, and Hasan Alpak. “Morphometric Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia of the Dogs”. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, vol. 11, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 66-71, doi:10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Kartal, Hasan Alpak. Morphometric evaluation of the relationship between the distal femur and proximal tibia of the dogs. Animal Health, Prod and Hyg. 2022 Dec. 1;11(2):66-71. doi:10.53913/aduveterinary.1104696

Cited By