Research Article

Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures

Volume: 51 Number: 1 March 30, 2018
TR EN

Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the augmentation techniques used in the surgical treatment of patellar tendon ruptures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out with sixty fresh-frozen bovine knees. Patellar tendon repair was performed with transosseous repair with Krackow or modified - Kessler suturing or suture anchor repair techniques. Dall-Miles cable, cerclage wire or polyester suture material was used for augmentation. each specimen was evaluated biomechanically by cyclic loading and static pullout tests.

RESULTS: Significantly lower cyclic elongation values were recorded in the transosseous repair with Krackow suture group (p <0.05) in the comparison of primary repair groups. Lower cyclic elongation and higher maximal tensile strength values were measured in the augmentation with Dall-Miles cable or cerclage wire groups than the other groups. Augmentation groups had higher maximal tensile strength values and lower gap formation than non-augmented groups.

CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical treatment of patellar tendon ruptures, augmentation biomechanically strengthens the initial stability of primary repair.   The transosseous repair augmented with the Dall-Miles cable or cerclage wire can be said to be the most biomechanically stabilizing technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM (2008) The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury 39:1338-1344. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.021
  2. Lanzi JT, Jr., Felix J, Tucker CJ, Cameron KL, Rogers J, Owens BD, Svoboda SJ (2016) Comparison of the Suture Anchor and Transosseous Techniques for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Study. Am J Sports Med 44:2076-2080. doi:10.1177/0363546516643811
  3. Sanchez G, Ferrari MB, Sanchez A, Moatshe G, Chahla J, DePhillipo N, Provencher MT (2017) Proximal Patellar Tendon Repair: Internal Brace Technique With Unicortical Buttons and Suture Tape. Arthrosc Tech 6:e491-e497. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2016.11.004
  4. Roudet A, Boudissa M, Chaussard C, Rubens-Duval B, Saragaglia D (2015) Acute traumatic patellar tendon rupture: Early and late results of surgical treatment of 38 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:307-311. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.017
  5. Marder RA, Timmerman LA (1999) Primary repair of patellar tendon rupture without augmentation. Am J Sports Med 27:304-307. doi:10.1177/03635465990270030601
  6. Otsubo H, Kamiya T, Suzuki T, Kuroda M, Ikeda Y, Matsumura T, Yamashita T (2017) Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Rupture Augmented with Strong Sutures. J Knee Surg 30:336-340. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1586725
  7. Ettinger M, Dratzidis A, Hurschler C, Brand S, Calliess T, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Petri M (2013) Biomechanical properties of suture anchor repair compared with transosseous sutures in patellar tendon ruptures: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 41:2540-2544. doi:10.1177/0363546513500633
  8. Bushnell BD, Byram IR, Weinhold PS, Creighton RA (2006) The use of suture anchors in repair of the ruptured patellar tendon: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 34:1492-1499. doi:10.1177/0363546506287489

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 30, 2018

Submission Date

July 24, 2018

Acceptance Date

July 26, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 51 Number: 1

APA
İyigün, A., Kocadal, O., İyidiker, M. A., Pepe, I. murad, Kızılay, O., Demir, T., & Aktekin, C. N. (2018). Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures. Ankara Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, 51(1), 33-39. https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN
AMA
1.İyigün A, Kocadal O, İyidiker MA, et al. Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi. 2018;51(1):33-39. https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN
Chicago
İyigün, Abdullah, Onur Kocadal, Mehmet Akif İyidiker, et al. 2018. “Biomechanical Comparison of Repair and Augmentation Techniques in Patellar Tendon Ruptures”. Ankara Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 51 (1): 33-39. https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN.
EndNote
İyigün A, Kocadal O, İyidiker MA, Pepe I murad, Kızılay O, Demir T, Aktekin CN (March 1, 2018) Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 51 1 33–39.
IEEE
[1]A. İyigün et al., “Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures”, Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 33–39, Mar. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN
ISNAD
İyigün, Abdullah - Kocadal, Onur - İyidiker, Mehmet Akif - Pepe, Ismail murad - Kızılay, Onur - Demir, Tevfik - Aktekin, Cem Nuri. “Biomechanical Comparison of Repair and Augmentation Techniques in Patellar Tendon Ruptures”. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 51/1 (March 1, 2018): 33-39. https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN.
JAMA
1.İyigün A, Kocadal O, İyidiker MA, Pepe I murad, Kızılay O, Demir T, Aktekin CN. Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi. 2018;51:33–39.
MLA
İyigün, Abdullah, et al. “Biomechanical Comparison of Repair and Augmentation Techniques in Patellar Tendon Ruptures”. Ankara Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, vol. 51, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 33-39, https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN.
Vancouver
1.Abdullah İyigün, Onur Kocadal, Mehmet Akif İyidiker, Ismail murad Pepe, Onur Kızılay, Tevfik Demir, Cem Nuri Aktekin. Biomechanical comparison of repair and augmentation techniques in patellar tendon ruptures. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 1;51(1):33-9. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA72MG79KN