İmplant Destekli Mandibular Overdenture Protezlerin Yaşam Kalitesine Olan Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi: Pilot Çalışma

Year 2022, , 332 - 336, 25.12.2022

Fatih Demirci , Abdulsamet Tanık

https://doi.org/10.46332/aemj.1058977

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, mandibular iki implant destekli protezlerin bir grup hastanın yaşam kalitesine etkisini incelemekti.

Araçlar ve Yöntem: Bu pilot çalışma, 2016 ve 2020 yılları arasında Adıyaman Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi'nde implant destekli mandibular overdenture protez isteyen tam dişsiz altmış üç katılımcı (51-83 yaşlarında) ile gerçekleştirildi. Mandibular interforaminal bölgesine iki dental implant yerleştirdikten 6 hafta sonra her hastaya mandibular implant destekli overdenture protezler ile maksiller konvansiyonel tam protezler uygulandı. Hastaların protetik tedavi öncesi ve sonrası yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi için ağız sağlığı etki profilinin (OHIP-14) Türkçe versiyonu kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Tedavi öncesi puanlarla karşılaştırıldığında, katılımcılar yeni protezlerini aldıktan sonra yaşam kalitesinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı iyileşme kaydedildi (p<0.001). Tedavi öncesi ve sonrası OHIP-14 puanları ile cinsiyet arasında ki-kare testinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamadı (p>0.05).

Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, mandibular iki implant destekli overdenture protezlerin tam dişsiz hastalarının yaşam kalitesini iyileştirdiği sonucuna varılabilir.

Keywords

implant destekli protez, tam protezler, yaşam beklentisi

Supporting Institution

yok

Thanks

yok

Evaluation of the Effect of Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures on Quality of Life: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of mandibular two-implant overdentures on the quality of life of a group of patients.

Materials and Methods: This pilot study was performed with 63 edentulous participants (51-83 years old) who requested implant-supported mandibular overdentures at Adiyaman University, Faculty of Dentistry between 2016 and 2020. Six weeks after two dental implants were placed in the mandibular interforaminal region, mandibular implant-supported overdentures and maxillary conventional complete dentures were applied to each patient. Turkish version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) was used to evaluate the patients' quality of life before and after prosthetic treatment.

Results: Compared with pre-treatment scores, participants had statistically significant improvements in quality of life after receiv-ing their new prostheses (p<0.001). No statistically significant correlation was found between pre- and post-treatment OHIP-14 scores and gender in the chi-square test (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that mandibular two-implant overdentures improve the quality of life of edentulous patients.

Keywords

complete denture, implant-supported denture, life expectancy

References

• 1. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):399-410.
• 2. Kutkut A, Bertoli E, Frazer R, Pinto-Sinai G, Hidalgo RF, Studts J. A systematic review of studies comparing conventi-onal complete denture and implant retained overdenture. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(1):1-9.
• 3. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002;19(1):3-4.
• 4. Geckili O, Bilhan H, Bilgin T. Impact of mandibular two-implant retained overdentures on life quality in a group of el-derly Turkish edentulous patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;53(2):233-236.
• 5. Gonçalves F, Campestrini VLL, Rigo-Rodrigues MA, Zanardi PR. Effect of the attachment system on the biomechanical and clinical performance of overdentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123 (4):589-594.
• 6. Cakarer S, Can T, Yaltirik M, Keskin C. Complications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for imp-lant-supported overdentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(7):e953-e959.
• 7. Cristache CM, Muntianu LAS, Burlibasa M, Didilescu AC. Five year clinical trial using three attachment systems for implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(2):e171-e178.
• 8. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(5):446-450.
• 9. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988;5(1):3-18.
• 10. Sánchez-Siles M, Ballester-Ferrandis JF, Salazar-Sánchez N, Gómez‐García FJ, Moraleja‐Ruiz R, Camacho‐Alonso F. Long-term evaluation of quality of life and satisfaction between implant bar overdentures and conventional complete dentures: A 23 years retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(2):208-214.
• 11. Değirmenci K, Sabak C. Hareketli bölümlü protez kullanımının kişilerin kısa dönemdeki yaşam kalitesine olan etkisinin OHIP-14 anketi ile değerlendirilmesi: pilot çalışma. FÜ Sağ Bil Tıp Derg. 2021;35(2):134-140.
• 12. Al-Omiri MK, Karasneh J. Relationship between oral health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and personality in pati-ents with prosthetic rehabilitations. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(1):2-9.
• 13. Kronstrom M, Carlsson GE. An international survey among prosthodontists of the use of mandibular implant suppor-ted dental prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28(2):e622-e626.
• 14. Heydecke G, Tedesco LA, Kowalski C, Inglehart MR. Complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life-do co-ping styles matter? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(4):297-306.
• 15. Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(3):161-168.
• 16. Altay MA, Ozarslan MM, Yildirimyan N, Sindel A. What is the Impact of implant-supported mandibular overdentures on oral health-related quality of life? a retrospective study. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2019;9:101-106.
• 17. Knipfer C, Riemann M, Bocklet T, et al. Speech intelligibility enhancement after maxillary denture treatment and its im-pact on quality of life. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(1):61-69.