Surgery-Related Neurosurgical Complications in Elderly Patients: Definition of Risk Factors and Importance of Preoperative Assessments
Abstract
Purpose: To reveal the surgical complications that may be encountered in neurosurgical patients over 60 years of age and to discuss them according to literature.
Materials and Methods: The files of 283 patients over 60 years of age who underwent neurosurgical operation in our clinic were reviewed. According to surgery type, they were evaluated in 3 different groups as cranial, spinal and peripheral nerve surgery. The stages of the emergence of complications were evaluated in 3 groups: early hospitalization, late hospitalization, and late period complications.
Results: 117 patients underwent cranial, 52 patients underwent spinal and 114 patients underwent peripheral nerve surgery. Depending on the applied surgical technique, the rates of complications were determined. In patients who underwent cranial surgery, there was no significant difference between the number of complications encountered in early postoperative and post-discharge periods. Wound site infection was the most common complication. In the patients whose Karnofsky score is low, the incidence of additional neurological deficit development was found to be significantly higher. The postoperative recovery period was found to be prominently longer.
Conclusion: Additional methods may need to be used to prevent the development of neurosurgical complications in elderly patients. Among those complications, wound infection is the most common. The Karnofsky score assessment is one of the most important parameters in predicting the quality and length of life in the postoperative period for cranial and spinal surgeries.
Keywords
References
- 1 - Crooks, V, Waller S, et al. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol 1991; 46:M139-M44.
- 2 - Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncology 1984; 2:187-93.
- 3 - Çakır CÖ ve Çaylı S: Komplikasyonlara Genel Bakış. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergisi 2013; 23:114-20.
- 4 - Applebaum EL, Chow JM. CSF Leaks. In: Cummings CW (ed). Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery St Louis Mosby 1993.p.965-74.
- 5 - Cammisa FP Jr, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS: Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:2663–7.
- 6 - Khan MH, Rihn J, Steele G et al: Postoperative management protocol for incidental dural tears during degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a review of 3,183 consecutive degenerative lumbar cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:2609-13.
- 7 - Epstein NE: The frequency and etiology of intraoperative dural tears in 110 predominantly geriatric patients undergoing multilevel laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20:380–6.
- 8 - Nichols RL, Smith JW, Klein DB.et al. Risk of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:1065-70.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ziya Asan
*
0000-0001-8468-9156
Türkiye
Publication Date
August 15, 2018
Submission Date
January 28, 2018
Acceptance Date
June 11, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 2
