Publication Ethics
Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) is based on the principles of producing, developing, evaluating and sharing the processes of interdisciplinary studies, especially in the field of engineering and technology, in an impartial way with the scientific method. It is very important that the work of all stakeholders, namely authors, editors, referees, publishers and readers, who produce a scientific study, comply with scientific ethical principles.
When situations such as manipulating, distorting and using fabricated data used in the articles are detected, this situation will be reported to the institution where the article author works, and the article will be rejected. The use of data that does not comply with ethical rules is the responsibility of the authors, and the detected deficiencies will be reported to the author's institution and the article will be rejected. For peer-reviewed studies that support scientific methods, ethical responsibilities are expected by all stakeholders within the scope of publication ethics of Applied Engineering and Technology (AET).
The publication and ethical rules of the studies submitted to the Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) were arranged in line with the guidelines and policies published in the open access COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
Every article submitted to the Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) and even after its publication, the Editorial Board ensures that the journal policies such as publication, blind refereeing, evaluation process, and ethical principles are determined and implemented.
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Articles submitted to Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) should not contain plagiarism and should be original. The author(s) who submit a study to the Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) are expected to comply with the ethical responsibilities stated below:
Plagiarism and Unethical Behaviors
All of the articles sent to Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) are checked using the iThenticate plagiarism detection software, and in line with the similarity report determined by the software, the editorial board decides to send the article for peer review or directly reject it. Except for the highest bibliography accepted by the journal, the similarity rate is 15%. Articles exceeding this rate are examined in detail. If deemed necessary, it is sent back to the authors for revision or correction. If plagiarism is detected in the article, its publication is rejected.