Hollanda Hastalığı Hipotezi Türk Ekonomisi İçin Geçeli mi ?: Portföy Yatırımları, Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada son yıllarda ortaya çıkan gelişmeler doğrultusunda Türkiye açısından Hollanda hastalığı sorunu,  Tarım sektörü açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Bu değerlendirme yapılırken 1990-2015 dönemine ait kişi başına gelir, sanayi üretim endeksi, enflasyon, döviz kuru ve bütün bunların bir yansıması olarak dış ticaret verilerinden yararlanarak ve panel veri analizi yöntemi kullanılarak Hollanda hastalığının tarım sektörü üzerindeki ortaya çıkabilme (varlığı) test edilmiştir. Çalışmada yapılan analiz neticesinde, Türkiye’ye giren sıcak para miktarındaki artışın, tarım sektörünü olumsuz yönde etkilediği ve Türkiye’de tarım sektörü açısından Hollanda hastalığı sorunun söz konusu olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. 

Keywords

• Hollanda hastalığı,Ekonomik büyüme,Portföy yatırımları

Is The Dutch Disease Valid for Turkey in terms of the Effects of Portfolio Investments and Export Revenues on the Manufacturing Industry?

Abstract

The Dutch disease which emerges as a result of suddenly finding a large amount of commercially valuable mines, is an economical issue which has an effect on various macroeconomic variables, notably on foreign exchange rate. Although in theory, the Dutch disease is defined as a problem caused by foreign currency which is acquired by the detection and exportation of valuable mines in the long term, it is possible for other economic developments which provide inflow of foreign currency to the country to have economical effects on the national economy that are similar to the effects of the Dutch disease. In our study in which we question the existence of the Dutch disease due to the inflow of foreign currency through various channels, the effects of portfolio investments and export revenues on manufacturing industry sector were analyzed in terms of the hypothesis of the Dutch disease by using the quarterly data of 2005:Q1-2018:Q4, obtained from the Electronic Data Delivery System (EDDS) of The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) and by using Toda-Yamamoto causality test. As a result of the analysis, there wasn’t a causal relationship between manufacturing industry and portfolio investments and exports. For this reason, it was concluded that the Dutch disease is out of the question for Turkey’s economy. 

Keywords

• The Dutch Disease,Industrial Production Index,Portfolio Investments,Export,Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test.

References

1. Akay Kanalıcı, H., Aklan Adanur, N ve Çınar M. (2016). Economıc Growth and the Unemployment Rate in Turkey, Journal of Management and Economic Research, 14(1), s. 209-226
2. Aksu, L. (2017). The Analysıs of The Relatıonshıp Between The Employment-Productıvıty And Economıc Growth in Turkey, Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 4(1), p. 39-94
3. Acosta, P., Lartey, E. K. K., Mandelman, F. S. (2009). “Remittances and the Dutch Disease”, Journal of International Economics, 79(1), p. 102–116,
4. Akça, E. E. ve Bal, E., (2017). Workers' Remittances and Dutch Disease: A Panel Data Analysis for Selected Countries, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Science, 12(2), p. 49-64
5. Akçacı, T. ve Karaata, A. (2014). The Paradoxical Effect of International Funds in Turkey: Dutch Disease, Internatıonal Conference On Eurasıan Economıes 2014 inside Sessıon 6B: İnternational Economy I, p. 385-394, Ed. Sarı, S., Gencer ve Sözen, İ., Skopje - Macedonia
6. Arı, Özcan, 2011. “Workers’ Remıttances And Economıc Growth Relatıon: A Dynamıc Panel Data Analysıs”, Erciyes University Journal of Economics and Administrative Science, (38), p. 101-117
7. Benkhodj, M.H. (2014). “Monetary Policy and the Ducth Disease Effect in an Oil Exporting Economy”, International Economics, (138), p. 78-102
8. Bourdet, Y ve Falck, H. (2006). “Emigrants' remittances and Dutch Disease in Cape Verde”, International Economic Journal, 20(3), p. 267-284.

9. Destek, M. A., Okumuş, İ ve Yıldırım, A. (2017). The Dutch Disease Effect on Agricultural Value Added: Evidence from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, Bilig Journal, (83), p. 225-239.
10. Hasanov, F. (2013). “Dutch Disease and the Azerbaijan Economy”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(4), p. 463-480.
11. Kutan, A. M. ve Wyzan, M. L. (2005). “Explaining the Real Exchange Rate in Kazakhstan, 1996–2003: Is Kazakhstan Vulnerable to the Dutch Disease?”, Economic Systems, 29(2), p.242–255.
12. Matsen, E. ve Torvik, R. (2005). “Optimal Dutch Disease”, Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), p. 494-515.
13. Mercan, M. ve Göçer, İ. (2014). Dutch Disease Risk in Central Asian Turkish Republics: An Empirical Analysis Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Science, 32(2), p. 251-274
14. Mironov, V.V. ve Petronevic, A.V. (2015). Discovering the Signs of Dutch Disease in Russia, Resources Policy, 46(2), p. 97-112Nowak, j. J. Ve Sahli, M., (2007). “Coastal Tourism and 'Dutch Disease' in a Small Island Economy”, Tourism Economics, 13, p. 49-65
15. Örnek, İ. (2006). “Foreign Capital Flows Effect on Domestic Saving and Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey”, Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Politics Science, 63-2, p. 199-217,
16. Parlakyıldız F.M. ve Uçan, O. (2012). “IMF Disease: Turkey Case”, Paradoks Economics, Sociology and Policy Journal, 8(2), p. 25-39Rajan, R. G. ve Subramanian, A. (2011). “Aid, Dutch Disease, and Manufacturing Growth” Journal of Development Economics, 94(1), p. 106–118,
17. Ripon Roy, R ve Dixon, R. (2016). Workers’ remittances and the Dutch disease in South Asian countries, Applied Economics Letters, 23(6), p. 407-410,
18. Yardımcıoğlu, F. ve Gülmez, A. (2013). Dutch Disease in the OPEC Countries: An Econometric Analysis of the Relationship between Oil Prices and Economic Growth, Sosyoekonomi Journal, 19(19), s. 117-140