Adaptation Approach to Technology Transfer Strategy

Year 2018, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 134 - 178, 30.06.2018

Fahri Özsungur

https://doi.org/10.33722/afes.471087

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Technology transfer is an important way for enterprises to gain
competitive advantage. For the customer satisfaction and profitability, the
process after the decision is as important as the transfer itself. In
technology transfer, which brings significant costs and risks for enterprises,
these processes must be carried out in an adaptive manner and an appropriate
strategy should be developed. Sustainable company strategies should be
determined in terms of sustainability, profitability, adaptation to developing
technology, and technology to be transferred to maintain competitiveness with
regards to strategic management. Developed strategies to be open to change and
improvement and assigning them to the enterprise and its environment are
important for sustainability. In this study, the approach of adaptation to
technology transfer strategy is discussed with the content analysis method and
the theoretical and strategic approaches related to the research subject are
examined. The basic information and suggestions for developing adaptive
strategies on the basis of production strategies in technology transfer have
been introduced. With this study, it is aimed to contribute to the literature
about the importance of adaptation in the transfer process, strategy formation,
and in-house information flow in technology transfer. The fact that the
adaptation issue is not included in the technology transfer strategy literature
reveals the importance of the study.

Keywords

Technology Transfer, Adaptation Approach, Technology Transfer Strategy, Technology Transfer Stages.Muhammad Family, Alms/Zakat, Prophet, Economic, Analysis

References

• Albanese, R. (1988). Management, Ohio: South Western Publishing.
• Baark, E., Heeks, R. (1999). Donor-funded information technology transfer projects: evaluating the life-cycle approach in four Chinese science and technology projects. Information Technology for Development, 8: 185-97.
• Bell, M. (1987). The acquisition of imported technology for industrial development: Problems of strategies and management in Arab Region. ESCWA, United Nations University, Bhagdad.
• Böhm, A. (2008). The Swot Analysis. Grin Verlag.
• Burgelman, R. A., Rosenbloom, R. S. (1989). Technology Strategy: An evolutionary process perspective: research on technological innovation. Management and Policy, 4, JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, Conn.: 1-23.
• Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41 (162): 176–193.
• Cochran, C. (2006). Becoming a customer-focused organization. Paton Professional.
• Cohen, G. (2004). Technology transfer: Strategic management in developing countries. Sage Publications, New Delhi.
• Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.
• Deming, W. E. (2000). Out of the crisis, The MIT Press.
• Derakhshani, S. (1984). Factors affecting success in international transfers of technology—a synthesis, and a test of a new contingency model. Developing Economies, 22: 1–19.
• Desai, A. V. (1984). India’s technological capability: an analysis of its achievements and limits. Research Policy, 13: 303–310.
• Ferrel, O. C. (2012). Hartline, Michael, Marketing Strategy. Cengage Learning.
• Freeman, C. (1976). The economics of industrial innovation (Second edition). Pinter Publisher, London.
• Friar, J., Horwitch, M. (1986). The emergence of technology strategy: a new dimension of strategic management. M. Horwitch (Ed.), Technology in the modern corporation A strategic perspective içinde. Pergamon Press.
• Gardner, R. A. (2004). The Process-focused Organization: A Transition Strategy for Success. ASQ Quality Press.
• Gilbert, A. L. (1992). A Transaction Costs Model of International Information Technology Transfers: The Dynamics of Intelligence and Control, S Palvia, P Palvia & RM Zigli (Ed.), The Global Issues of Information Technology Management içinde, IDEA Group Publishing, Harrisburg, London.
• Grosse. R. (1996). International Technology Transfer in Services. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (4): 781-801.
• Hampson, K., Tatum C. B. (1997). Technology Strategy and Competitive Performance in Bridge Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123 (2): 153-161.
• Hampson, K. D. (1993). Technology Strategy and Competitive Performance : A Study of Bridge Construction. Doctor of Philosophy, Dissertation, Stanford University.
• Hay, J. E. (2003). Report on workshop on technology needs assessment and technology transfer Project. Niue Climate Change Project, Phase II.
• Imai, M. (2012). Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense Approach to a Continuous Improvement Strategy, Second Edition, McGraw Hill Professional.
• Kobu, B. (1993). Üretim Yönetimi, Avcıol Basım Yayın.
• Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383–397.
• Kumar, V., Kumar, U., Persaud, A. (1999). Building technological capability through importing technology: The case of Indonesian manufacturing industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24 (1): 81–96.
• Kumar, B. N. (1995). Partner-selection-criteria and success of technology transfer: A model based on learning theory applied to the case of Indo-German technical collaborations. Management International Review, 35 (1): 65-78.
• Lall, S. (1982). Developing countries as exporters of technology: A first look at the Indian experience. Macmillan, London.
• Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (12): 1139–1161.
• Liao, S. H., Hu, T. C. (2007). Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: An empirical study of the Taiwan’s industry. Technovation, 27 (6–7): 402–411.
• Maidique, M. A., Patch, P. (1988). Corporate strategy and technological policy: Readings in the management of innovation, Second Edition, M. L. Tushman and W. L. Moore, eds., Ballinger, New York, N. Y.: 236- 248.
• Monden, Y., Imai, N., Matsuo, T., Yamaguchi, N. (2013). Management of service businesses in Japan, World Scientific.
• Nahar, N. (2001). Information technology supported technology transfer process: A multisite case study of high-tech enterprises, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
• Nieto- Rodriguez, A. (2012). The focused organization: How concentrating on a few key initiatives can dramatically improve strategy execution, Gower Publishing Ltd.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
• Phusavat, K., Kanchana, R. (2007). Competitive priorities of manufacturing firms in Thailand. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 7 (7): 979-996.
• Raia, A. R. (1963). A case study of the effects of goal-setting and self-control on organization performance, UCLA.
• Ramanathan, K. (2008). An overview of technology transfer and technology transfer models, international conference on “south – south cooperation for technology transfer and development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs)”, Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology (APCTT) United Nations – ESCAP.
• Rodriguez, J. L. Rodriguez, R. M. G. (2005). Technology and export behaviour: A resource-based view approach. International Business Review, 14 (5): 539–557.
• Wei, L., (1995). International technology transfer and development of technological capabilities: a theoretical framework. Technology in Society. 17 (1): 103–120.
• Xu, B. (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62 (2): 477–493.
• Yin, E., Bao, Y. (2006). The acquisition of tacit knowledge in China: An empirical analysis of the ‘supplier-side individual level’ and ‘recipient-side’ factors. Management International Review, 46 (3): 327–348.
• Takahashi, S., Sallach, D., Rouchier, J. (2007). Advancing social simulation: The First World Congress, Springer Science & Business Media.
• Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15 (6): 285- 305.
• Tsang, E. W. K., Nguyen, D. T., Erramilli, M. K. (2004). Knowledge acquisition and performance of international joint ventures in the transition economy of Vietnam. Journal of International Marketing, 12 (2): 82–103.
• Tsang, E. W. K. (1997). Choice of international technology transfer mode: A resource based view. Management International Review, 37 (2): 151-168.
• Zander, U. (1991). Exploiting a Technological Edge—Voluntary and Involuntary Dissemination of Technology, IIB, Stockholm School of Economics.