BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 17, 29.06.2015

Hilal Erkol

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between their perceived organizational support level and personal traits (gender, age, tenure, marital status, school type and staff). The sample of the study consists of 136 high school teachers working in Derince, Kocaeli in 2013 – 2014 education year. The study was designed as survey model. Descriptive statistical methods (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation), independent sample t-tests and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. In the results of the research, the mean scores of teachers’ showed that most of high school teachers have a moderate level of organizational support while some of them have a high level of organizational support. Research results show a significant difference according to gender variable and it was understood that female high school teachers perceived more organizational support at work than male high school teachers. While organizational support perception of the teachers in high schools don’t show any statically significant difference with regard to tenure, marital status, school type and staffing, it shows a positive relationship through high school teachers’ age

Keywords

Perceived Organizational Support Personal Traits High School Teacher

References

  • Abdollahi, Farhad M.A., Piri, M.A., Azimi, Mohammad M. A. (2013). The relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational commitment among faculty members. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 475-479.
  • Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C., Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309-327.
  • Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A., Turunç, Ö. (2012). The effect of development culture and perceived organizational support to the job satisfaction and job performance: The mediating role of trust. Yönetim ve Ekonomi. 19(1), 105-136.
  • Allen, M.W. (1995). Communication concepts related to perceived organizational support. Western Journal of Communication, 59 (Fall), 326 – 346.
  • Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M. ve Griffeth, R.W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99–118
  • Aselega, J. ve Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration. Joumal of Organizational Behavior 24, 491-509.
  • Atalay, İ. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel adalet. Yüksek lisans tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Aydın, M. (2007). Eğitim yönetimi. Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayıncılık.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Performans yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayınları.
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2005). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama (8. bs). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık
  • Bogler, R. ve Nir, A. E. (2010). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction. What’s empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306.
  • Bolat, T. ve Seymen, O.A. (2006). Yönetim ve örgüt düşüncesinde kuramsalcılık. Yeni kuramsalcılık ve kurumsal eş biçimcilik. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 223-254.
  • Bostancı, A.B. (2013). The mediator role of perceived administrator support in the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of organizational justice and organizational support. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 823-834.
  • Campell, N.S., Perry, S.J., Maertz Jr, C.P., Allen, D.G. ve Griffeth, R.W. (2013). All you need is … resources: The effects of justice and support on burnout and turnover. Human Relations, 66(6), 759-782.
  • Celep, C. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Adanma ve Öğretmenler. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Chen, C.C. ve Chiu, S.F. (2008). An integrative model linking supervisor support and organizational citizenship behavior. J Bus Psychol, 23, 1-10.
  • Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K.M., Sucharski, I.L., Aselega,J. (2009). Perceived Organizational Support and Extra - Role Performance: Which Leads to Which? The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124.
  • Chen, S.H., Yu, H.Y., Hsu, H.Y., Lin, F.C., Lou, J.H. (2013). Organisational support, organisational identification and organisational citizenship behaviour among male nurses, Journal of Nursing Management, 21, 1072-1082.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P.E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 86(2), 278–321.
  • DeConnick, J.B. ve Johnson, J.T. (2009). The effects of perceived organizational support and organizational justice on turnover among salespeople, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29(4), 333–350.
  • Dawley, D.D., Andrews, M.C. ve Buckler, N.S. (2007). Mentoring, supervisor support and perceived organizational support: what matters most? Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 29(3), 235-247.
  • Dysvık, A. ve Kuvaas, B. (2012). Perceived supervisor support climate, perceived investment in employee development climate and business – unit performance. e-journal of Human Resource Management, (September–October), 51 (5) , 651–664.
  • Eder, P. ve Eisenberger, R. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior, Journal of Management, 34(55).
  • Eğriboyun D. (2013). Ortaöğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel güven, örgütsel destek ve örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki(Bolu ili örneği), Doktora Tezi, Abant izzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Debora, S. (1986), “Perceived organizational support”, Journal Of Applied Psychology, 71 (3), 500-507.
  • Eisenberger, R., P. Fasolo, V. Davis-LaMastro. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
  • Eisenberger, R., J. Cummings, S. Armeli, P. Lynch. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (5), 812-820.
  • Eisenberger, R., Pierce W.D. ve Cameron, J. (1999), Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation - Negative, neutral and positive: Commnet on deci, koestner and ryan, Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 677-691.
  • Eisenberger, R., S. Armeli, B. Rexwinkel, P.D. Lynch, L. Rhoades. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 42-51.
  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vanderberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L. ve Rhoades L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.
  • Eisenberger, R., Jones, J.R., Aselega, J., Sucharski, I.L. (2004). Perceived Orgainzational Support, the employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (Edt. J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore and S. Taylor, & L. Tetrick), Oxford University Press.
  • Eren, E. (2008). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi, 11. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.
  • Folger, R. ve Knovsky, M.A. (1999). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay rise decisions. e-journal of Academy of Management, 32(1), 115-130.
  • Francis C.A. (2011). The mediating force of ''Face'': Supervisor character and status related to perceived organizational support and work outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 58– 67.
  • Gavino, M.C., Wayne, S.J., Erdoğan, B. (2012). Discretionary and transactional human resource practices and employee outcomes: The role of perceived organizational support. Human Resource Management, (September–October), 51(5), 665–686.
  • Gillet, N., Gagne, M., Sauvagere, S., Fouquereau, E. (2012). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees' satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450-460.
  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, American Sociological Review,25( 2), 161-178.
  • Gül, A.L. (2010). Lise öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre örgütsel destek (Ankara İli Örneği), Doktora Tezi, -Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Ankara.
  • Gürbüz R. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve örgütsel güvenin, örgütsel bağlılık ile ilişkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Erzurum.
  • Ghasemizad A. ve Mohammadkhani K. (2013). The relationship between perceived organizational support, organizational commitment, and quality of work life and productivity, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(8), 431-436.
  • Harris, R.B., Harris, J.B. ve Harwey, P. (2007). A test of competing models of the relationships among perceptions of organizational politics, perceived organizational support, and individual outcomes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(6), 631–655.
  • Hayton, J., Carnabuci, G., Eisenberger, R. (2011). With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 235–249.
  • Howes, J.C., Cropanzano, R., Grandey, A.A., Mohler, C.J. (2000). Who is supporting whom? Quality team effectiveness and perceived organizational support, Journal of Quality Management, 5, 207-223.
  • Huang, Y.C. (2003). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among faculty at Taiwan’s higher education institutions, Doctoral Dissertation, The Graduate College at the University of Nebreska at Omaha, Nebreska.
  • Hui, C., Wong, A. ve Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 735–751.
  • Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizaitonal support, Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 12(1), 159-174.
  • Irvine, D.M., Leatt, P., Evans, G.M. ve Baker G.R. (2004). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of quality improvement teams: The influence of leadership and the work unit environment. Journal of Quality Management, 4(2), 167-184.
  • Isfaq, A., Wan, W.İ., Samliah, M.A. ve Muhammad, R. (2011). Conceptualizing perceived organizational support: A Theoretical perspective. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 784-789.
  • İşcan, Ö. ve Sayın, U. (2010). Örgütsel Adalet, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişki. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(4), 195-216.
  • Kalağan G. (2009). Araştırma görevlilerinin örgütsel destek algıları ile örgütsel sinizm tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Antalya.
  • Kaplan, M. ve Öğüt, A. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel destek ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: Otel işletmelerinde bir uygulama, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 387-401.
  • Karasar N.(2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (19. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ticaret Ltd. Şti.
  • Kraimer, M.L. ve Wayne, S.J. (2004). An examination of perceived organizational support as a multidimensional construct in the context of an expatriate assignment. Journal of Management, 30, 209 – 237.
  • Krishnan, J. ve Mary, V.S. (2012). Perceived organizational support – An overview on its antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1-13.
  • Kossek, E.E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., Hammer, L.B. (2011). Workplace social support and work family conflict: A meta analysis clarifying the influence of general and work – family – spesific supervisor and organizational support, personal psychology, Personal Psychology, 64, 289–313.
  • Lynch, P.D., Eisenberger, R. ve Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees,. Journal of Applied Sociology, 84(4), 467-483.
  • McCharty, A., Cleveland, J.N., Hunter, S., Darcy, C. ve Grady G. (2012). Employee work–life balance outcomes in Ireland: a multilevel investigation of supervisory support and perceived organizational support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1257–1276.
  • Miao ve Liaoning(2011). Perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, task performance and organizational citizenship behavior in China. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management. 105-127.
  • Muse, L.A. ve Stampler, C.L. (2007). Perceived organizational support: Evidence for a mediated association with work performance. Journal of Managerial Issues. 19(4), 517-535.
  • Narang, L. ve Singh, L. (2012). Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between HR practices and organizational trust. Global Business Review, 13(2), 239-249.
  • Nayir, F. (2012). The relationship between perceived organizational support and teachers’ organizational commitment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 97- 116.
  • Nitesh, S., NandaKumar V.M. ve Asok Kumar S. (2013). Role of pay as perceived organizational support contributes to employee’s organizational commitment. Advances In Management, 6(8), 52-54.
  • Ng, T.W.H. ve Sorenson, K.L. (2008). Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Management, 33(3), 243-268.
  • Noruzy, A., Shatery, K., Rezazadeh, A. ve Hatami-Shirkouhi, L(2011). Investigation the relationship between organizational justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(7), 842-847.
  • Pohl, S., Battistelli, A. ve Librecht, J.(2013). The impact of perceived organizational support and job characteristics on nurses’ organizational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behaviour. 16 (2), 193-207.
  • Polat, S. (2007). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları, örgütsel güven düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Kocaeli.
  • Randall, M., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C.A. ve Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20,159-174.
  • Rhoades, L., R. Eisenberger, S. Armeli. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
  • Rhoades, L., R. Eisenberger. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
  • Riggle, R., Edmondson, D.R. ve Hansen J.D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62, 027–1030.
  • Safari, Maryam ve Jannati (2012). The effect of organizational justice and perceived organizational support on university staff job burnout (Case of university staff of Isfahan). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Vol. 6(7), 131-136 .
  • Sezgin, F. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları: Kavramsal bir çözümleme ve okul açısından bazı çıkarımlar, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 317-339.
  • Shanock, L.R. ve Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, Perceived organizational support,and performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695.
  • Stinglhamber, F., Cremer, D. ve Mercken, L. (2006). Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust: A multiple foci approach, Group & Organization Management, 31, 442-468.
  • Stinglhamber, F. ve Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 251–270.
  • Şişman, M. (2010), Örgütler ve Kültürler (3. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi
  • Taşdan, M. ve Yalçın, T. (2010). Relationship between primary school teachers’ perceived social support and organizational trust level, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(4), 2609-2620.
  • Özdevecioğlu, (2003). Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Bireylerarası Saldırgan Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 77-96.
  • Watt, J.D. ve Hargis, M.B. (2010). Boredom proneness: Its relationship with subjective underemployment, perceived organizational support, and job performance. J Bus Psychol, 25, 163 – 174.
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.
  • Wu, T.Y., Hu, C. Ve Jiang, D.Y. (2012). Is subordinate’s loyalty a precondition of supervisor’s benevolent leadership? The moderating effects of supervisor’s altruistic personality and perceived organizational support, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 145-155.
  • Young, B. (2012). On careers: Themes from the lives of four western canadian women educators, Canadian Journal of Education, 17(2), 148 – 161.
  • Yoshimura, Y.E. (2003). Employee traits, perceived organizational support, supervisory communication, affective commitment and intend to leave: Group differences. Degree of Masters of Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
  • Zhang, Y., Farh, J. Ve Wang, H. (2012). Organizational antecedents of employee perceived organizational support in China: A groundediInvestigation, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(2), 422–446.
  • Zone, E.J. (2013). The relationship of perceived organizational support, job satisfaciton and years of online teaching experience to work engagement among online undergraduate adjunct faculty members, Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Argosy University, Phoenix.

ORTAÖĞRETİM ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN ALGILADIKLARI ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEĞİN BİREYSEL ÖZELLİKLERİNE GÖRE İNCELENMESİ

Year 2015, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 17, 29.06.2015

Hilal Erkol

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı ortaöğretim öğretmenlerin algıladıkları örgütsel destek ile bireysel özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiyi (cinsiyet, yaş, medeni durum, çalıştığı okul türü, çalıştığı kadro, öğretmenlikteki hizmet süresi ve şu anda çalıştığı okuldaki hizmet süresi) incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Kocaeli ili Derince ilçesinde 2013 – 2014 Eğitim Öğretim yılında görev yapmakta olan ortaöğretim öğretmenleri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma tarama modelinde olup, verilerin analizinde betimleyici istatistiksel çözümlemeler (frekans ve yüzde değerleri, aritmetik ortalama ve standart sapma), bağımsız gruplar t testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin büyük çoğunluğu orta düzeyde, bir kısmı ise yüksek düzeyde örgütsel destek algıladıklarını ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırma sonuçları cinsiyet değişkenine göre kadınların lehine anlamlı bir farklılık göstermektedir. Araştırmaya katılan ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin algıladıkları örgütsel destek ile kıdem, medeni durum, okul türü ve çalışmakta olduğu okuldaki hizmet süresi arasında anlamlı bir farklılık görülmezken, yaş değişkeni ile pozitif yönlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

References

  • Abdollahi, Farhad M.A., Piri, M.A., Azimi, Mohammad M. A. (2013). The relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational commitment among faculty members. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 475-479.
  • Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C., Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309-327.
  • Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A., Turunç, Ö. (2012). The effect of development culture and perceived organizational support to the job satisfaction and job performance: The mediating role of trust. Yönetim ve Ekonomi. 19(1), 105-136.
  • Allen, M.W. (1995). Communication concepts related to perceived organizational support. Western Journal of Communication, 59 (Fall), 326 – 346.
  • Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M. ve Griffeth, R.W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99–118
  • Aselega, J. ve Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration. Joumal of Organizational Behavior 24, 491-509.
  • Atalay, İ. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel adalet. Yüksek lisans tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Aydın, M. (2007). Eğitim yönetimi. Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayıncılık.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Performans yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayınları.
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2005). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama (8. bs). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık
  • Bogler, R. ve Nir, A. E. (2010). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction. What’s empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306.
  • Bolat, T. ve Seymen, O.A. (2006). Yönetim ve örgüt düşüncesinde kuramsalcılık. Yeni kuramsalcılık ve kurumsal eş biçimcilik. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 223-254.
  • Bostancı, A.B. (2013). The mediator role of perceived administrator support in the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of organizational justice and organizational support. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 823-834.
  • Campell, N.S., Perry, S.J., Maertz Jr, C.P., Allen, D.G. ve Griffeth, R.W. (2013). All you need is … resources: The effects of justice and support on burnout and turnover. Human Relations, 66(6), 759-782.
  • Celep, C. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Adanma ve Öğretmenler. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Chen, C.C. ve Chiu, S.F. (2008). An integrative model linking supervisor support and organizational citizenship behavior. J Bus Psychol, 23, 1-10.
  • Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K.M., Sucharski, I.L., Aselega,J. (2009). Perceived Organizational Support and Extra - Role Performance: Which Leads to Which? The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124.
  • Chen, S.H., Yu, H.Y., Hsu, H.Y., Lin, F.C., Lou, J.H. (2013). Organisational support, organisational identification and organisational citizenship behaviour among male nurses, Journal of Nursing Management, 21, 1072-1082.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P.E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 86(2), 278–321.
  • DeConnick, J.B. ve Johnson, J.T. (2009). The effects of perceived organizational support and organizational justice on turnover among salespeople, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29(4), 333–350.
  • Dawley, D.D., Andrews, M.C. ve Buckler, N.S. (2007). Mentoring, supervisor support and perceived organizational support: what matters most? Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 29(3), 235-247.
  • Dysvık, A. ve Kuvaas, B. (2012). Perceived supervisor support climate, perceived investment in employee development climate and business – unit performance. e-journal of Human Resource Management, (September–October), 51 (5) , 651–664.
  • Eder, P. ve Eisenberger, R. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior, Journal of Management, 34(55).
  • Eğriboyun D. (2013). Ortaöğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel güven, örgütsel destek ve örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki(Bolu ili örneği), Doktora Tezi, Abant izzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Debora, S. (1986), “Perceived organizational support”, Journal Of Applied Psychology, 71 (3), 500-507.
  • Eisenberger, R., P. Fasolo, V. Davis-LaMastro. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
  • Eisenberger, R., J. Cummings, S. Armeli, P. Lynch. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (5), 812-820.
  • Eisenberger, R., Pierce W.D. ve Cameron, J. (1999), Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation - Negative, neutral and positive: Commnet on deci, koestner and ryan, Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 677-691.
  • Eisenberger, R., S. Armeli, B. Rexwinkel, P.D. Lynch, L. Rhoades. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 42-51.
  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vanderberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L. ve Rhoades L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.
  • Eisenberger, R., Jones, J.R., Aselega, J., Sucharski, I.L. (2004). Perceived Orgainzational Support, the employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (Edt. J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore and S. Taylor, & L. Tetrick), Oxford University Press.
  • Eren, E. (2008). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi, 11. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.
  • Folger, R. ve Knovsky, M.A. (1999). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay rise decisions. e-journal of Academy of Management, 32(1), 115-130.
  • Francis C.A. (2011). The mediating force of ''Face'': Supervisor character and status related to perceived organizational support and work outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 58– 67.
  • Gavino, M.C., Wayne, S.J., Erdoğan, B. (2012). Discretionary and transactional human resource practices and employee outcomes: The role of perceived organizational support. Human Resource Management, (September–October), 51(5), 665–686.
  • Gillet, N., Gagne, M., Sauvagere, S., Fouquereau, E. (2012). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees' satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450-460.
  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, American Sociological Review,25( 2), 161-178.
  • Gül, A.L. (2010). Lise öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre örgütsel destek (Ankara İli Örneği), Doktora Tezi, -Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Ankara.
  • Gürbüz R. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve örgütsel güvenin, örgütsel bağlılık ile ilişkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Erzurum.
  • Ghasemizad A. ve Mohammadkhani K. (2013). The relationship between perceived organizational support, organizational commitment, and quality of work life and productivity, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(8), 431-436.
  • Harris, R.B., Harris, J.B. ve Harwey, P. (2007). A test of competing models of the relationships among perceptions of organizational politics, perceived organizational support, and individual outcomes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(6), 631–655.
  • Hayton, J., Carnabuci, G., Eisenberger, R. (2011). With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 235–249.
  • Howes, J.C., Cropanzano, R., Grandey, A.A., Mohler, C.J. (2000). Who is supporting whom? Quality team effectiveness and perceived organizational support, Journal of Quality Management, 5, 207-223.
  • Huang, Y.C. (2003). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among faculty at Taiwan’s higher education institutions, Doctoral Dissertation, The Graduate College at the University of Nebreska at Omaha, Nebreska.
  • Hui, C., Wong, A. ve Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 735–751.
  • Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizaitonal support, Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 12(1), 159-174.
  • Irvine, D.M., Leatt, P., Evans, G.M. ve Baker G.R. (2004). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of quality improvement teams: The influence of leadership and the work unit environment. Journal of Quality Management, 4(2), 167-184.
  • Isfaq, A., Wan, W.İ., Samliah, M.A. ve Muhammad, R. (2011). Conceptualizing perceived organizational support: A Theoretical perspective. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 784-789.
  • İşcan, Ö. ve Sayın, U. (2010). Örgütsel Adalet, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişki. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(4), 195-216.
  • Kalağan G. (2009). Araştırma görevlilerinin örgütsel destek algıları ile örgütsel sinizm tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Antalya.
  • Kaplan, M. ve Öğüt, A. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel destek ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: Otel işletmelerinde bir uygulama, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 387-401.
  • Karasar N.(2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (19. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ticaret Ltd. Şti.
  • Kraimer, M.L. ve Wayne, S.J. (2004). An examination of perceived organizational support as a multidimensional construct in the context of an expatriate assignment. Journal of Management, 30, 209 – 237.
  • Krishnan, J. ve Mary, V.S. (2012). Perceived organizational support – An overview on its antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1-13.
  • Kossek, E.E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., Hammer, L.B. (2011). Workplace social support and work family conflict: A meta analysis clarifying the influence of general and work – family – spesific supervisor and organizational support, personal psychology, Personal Psychology, 64, 289–313.
  • Lynch, P.D., Eisenberger, R. ve Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees,. Journal of Applied Sociology, 84(4), 467-483.
  • McCharty, A., Cleveland, J.N., Hunter, S., Darcy, C. ve Grady G. (2012). Employee work–life balance outcomes in Ireland: a multilevel investigation of supervisory support and perceived organizational support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1257–1276.
  • Miao ve Liaoning(2011). Perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, task performance and organizational citizenship behavior in China. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management. 105-127.
  • Muse, L.A. ve Stampler, C.L. (2007). Perceived organizational support: Evidence for a mediated association with work performance. Journal of Managerial Issues. 19(4), 517-535.
  • Narang, L. ve Singh, L. (2012). Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between HR practices and organizational trust. Global Business Review, 13(2), 239-249.
  • Nayir, F. (2012). The relationship between perceived organizational support and teachers’ organizational commitment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 97- 116.
  • Nitesh, S., NandaKumar V.M. ve Asok Kumar S. (2013). Role of pay as perceived organizational support contributes to employee’s organizational commitment. Advances In Management, 6(8), 52-54.
  • Ng, T.W.H. ve Sorenson, K.L. (2008). Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Management, 33(3), 243-268.
  • Noruzy, A., Shatery, K., Rezazadeh, A. ve Hatami-Shirkouhi, L(2011). Investigation the relationship between organizational justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(7), 842-847.
  • Pohl, S., Battistelli, A. ve Librecht, J.(2013). The impact of perceived organizational support and job characteristics on nurses’ organizational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behaviour. 16 (2), 193-207.
  • Polat, S. (2007). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları, örgütsel güven düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstütüsü, Kocaeli.
  • Randall, M., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C.A. ve Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20,159-174.
  • Rhoades, L., R. Eisenberger, S. Armeli. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
  • Rhoades, L., R. Eisenberger. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
  • Riggle, R., Edmondson, D.R. ve Hansen J.D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62, 027–1030.
  • Safari, Maryam ve Jannati (2012). The effect of organizational justice and perceived organizational support on university staff job burnout (Case of university staff of Isfahan). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Vol. 6(7), 131-136 .
  • Sezgin, F. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları: Kavramsal bir çözümleme ve okul açısından bazı çıkarımlar, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 317-339.
  • Shanock, L.R. ve Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, Perceived organizational support,and performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695.
  • Stinglhamber, F., Cremer, D. ve Mercken, L. (2006). Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust: A multiple foci approach, Group & Organization Management, 31, 442-468.
  • Stinglhamber, F. ve Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 251–270.
  • Şişman, M. (2010), Örgütler ve Kültürler (3. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi
  • Taşdan, M. ve Yalçın, T. (2010). Relationship between primary school teachers’ perceived social support and organizational trust level, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(4), 2609-2620.
  • Özdevecioğlu, (2003). Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Bireylerarası Saldırgan Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 77-96.
  • Watt, J.D. ve Hargis, M.B. (2010). Boredom proneness: Its relationship with subjective underemployment, perceived organizational support, and job performance. J Bus Psychol, 25, 163 – 174.
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.
  • Wu, T.Y., Hu, C. Ve Jiang, D.Y. (2012). Is subordinate’s loyalty a precondition of supervisor’s benevolent leadership? The moderating effects of supervisor’s altruistic personality and perceived organizational support, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 145-155.
  • Young, B. (2012). On careers: Themes from the lives of four western canadian women educators, Canadian Journal of Education, 17(2), 148 – 161.
  • Yoshimura, Y.E. (2003). Employee traits, perceived organizational support, supervisory communication, affective commitment and intend to leave: Group differences. Degree of Masters of Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
  • Zhang, Y., Farh, J. Ve Wang, H. (2012). Organizational antecedents of employee perceived organizational support in China: A groundediInvestigation, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(2), 422–446.
  • Zone, E.J. (2013). The relationship of perceived organizational support, job satisfaciton and years of online teaching experience to work engagement among online undergraduate adjunct faculty members, Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Argosy University, Phoenix.
There are 85 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Hilal Erkol

Publication Date June 29, 2015
Submission Date June 29, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Erkol, H. (2015). ORTAÖĞRETİM ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN ALGILADIKLARI ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEĞİN BİREYSEL ÖZELLİKLERİNE GÖRE İNCELENMESİ. Anadolu Eğitim Liderliği Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 3(1), 1-17.

Bu Dergide Yayınlanan İçerikler Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY 4.0) Tarafından Lisanslanmıştır.