THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT ON SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLIER SELECTION

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 45 - 64, 01.02.2019

Funda Seçkin

Abstract

Abstract

Supply chain management, one of the most important business strategies of the century, founded in the

20th century, presents itself as a constantly expanding and living concept. Over time, many new strategies

and concepts that have been developed and are still being developed have been integrated into supply

chain management and the responsibilities and obligations of the companies that manufacture in this context

are increasing exponentially. Suppliers’ being directly determinant in product performance and companies’

being held responsible for their suppliers’ fields of activity in addition to their own have made it mandatory

to reaffirm the requirements of the supplier selection process. One of the most important of these

requirements is the concept of “sustainability”. In sustainability-oriented systems, decisions are made up of triple

bottom line approach that handles economic, environmental and social grounds all together. Within the

context of supply chain management, regarding the selection of the suppliers, purely economic (traditional)

studies have been replaced by the approaches based on this new perspective. In this study, the diffusion of

sustainability in supply chain management was investigated and the effects on supplier selection were examined.

Suggestions for future studies were also presented.

Keywords

Supply Chain Management, Supplier Selection, Sustainability, Triple Bottom Line Approach, Corporate Environmental Responsibility-CER, Corporate Social Responsibility-CSR

TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİNDE VE TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK KAVRAMININ GELİŞİMİ

Abstract

Özet

20nci yüzyılda temelleri atılan ve bu yüzyılın en önemli iş stratejilerinden biri olan tedarik zinciri yönetimi, sınırları

sürekli genişleyen, yaşayan bir kavram olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Zaman içerisinde geliştirilmiş ve

halen geliştirilmekte olan pek çok yeni strateji ve konsept, tedarik zinciri yönetimine entegre edilmekte ve bu

doğrultuda üretim yapan firmaların sorumluluk ve zorunlulukları katlanarak artmaktadır. Tedarikçilerin ürün

performansı üzerinde direkt belirleyici olması ve günümüzde firmaların kendi faaliyet sahalarına ilave olarak

tedarikçilerinin de faaliyet sahalarından sorumlu tutulması, tedarikçilerin seçilmesi sürecindeki gereklilikleri

tekrar gözden geçirmeyi zorunlu kılmıştır. Bu gerekliliklerin başında da “sürdürülebilirlik” kavramı gelmektedir.

Sürdürülebilirliği gözeten sistemlerde kararlar ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal dayanakları birlikte ele alan

üç temelli muhasebe ile oluşturulmaktadır. Tedarik zinciri yönetimi kapsamında tedarikçi seçimi ile ilgili olarak

salt ekonomik (geleneksel) dayanağı gözeten çalışmalar yerini, bu yeni perspektifi temel alan yaklaşımlara

bırakmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada tedarik zinciri yönetiminde sürdürülebilirliğin yayılımı araştırılmış ve

tedarikçi seçimine olan etkileri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca gelecek çalışmalar için yol gösterici öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Tedarikçi Seçimi, Sürdürülebilirlik, Üç Temelli Muhasebe, Firmaların Çevresel Sorumlulukları, Firmaların Sosyal Sorumlulukları

References

• Amin, S. H. ve Razmi, J. 2009. An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management : A case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(4), 8639–8648.
• Amin, S. H. ve Zhang, G. 2012. An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 6782–6791.
• Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A. ve Bahreininejad, A. 2012. Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12(6), 1668–1677.
• Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S. ve Goyal, S. K. 2010. A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370–378.
• Bai, C. ve Sarkis, J. 2010a. Green supplier development : analytical evaluation using rough set theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1200–1210.
• Bai, C. ve Sarkis, J. 2010b. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264.
• Büyüközkan, G. ve Çifçi, G. 2011. A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in Industry, 62, 164–174.
• Büyüközkan, G. ve Çifçi, G. 2012. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011.
• Büyüközkan, G. ve Feyzioğlu, O. 2007. Evaluation of Suppliers ’ Environmental Management Performances by a Fuzzy Compromise Ranking Technique. Mult.-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 14, 309–323.
• Carter, C. R. ve Jennings, M. M. 2002. Logistics social responsibility: an integrative framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145–180.
• Chai, J., Liu, J. N. K. ve Ngai, E. W. T. 2013. Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems With Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885.
• Che, Z. H. 2010. Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and particle swarm optimisation for balanced and defective supply chain problems considering WEEE/RoHS directives. International Journal of Production Research, 48(11), 3355–3381.
• Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F. ve Chung, S. H. 2011. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E, 47(6), 822–836.
• Chopra, S. ve Meindl, P. 2010. Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning, and Operation (4th. ed.). Pearson.
• Çifçi, G. ve Büyüközkan, G. 2011. A Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Evaluate Green Suppliers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 4(5), 894–909.
• Danese, P. 2013. Supplier integration and company performance: A configurational view. Omega, 41(6), 1029–1041.
• Dat, L. Q., Linh, D. T. T., Chou, S.-Y. ve Yu, V. F. 2012. Optimizing reverse logistic costs for recycling endof- life electrical and electronic products. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(7), 6380–6387.
• Daugherty, P. J. 2011. Review of logistics and supply chain relationship literature and suggested research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 16–31.
• de Boer, L., Labro, E. ve Morlacchi, P. 2001. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(2), 75–89.
• Dickson, G.W. 1966. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2, 5–17.
• Enarsson, L. 1998. Evaluation of suppliers: how to consider the environment. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28(1), 5–17.
• Genovese, A., Koh, L. S. C., Bruno, G. ve Esposito, E. 2013. Greener supplier selection: state of the art and some empirical evidence. International Journal of Production Research.
• Gimenez, C. ve Tachizawa, E. M. 2012. Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543.
• Goebel, P., Reuter, C., Pibernik, R. ve Sichtmann, C. 2012. The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. Intern. Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 7–17.
• Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. ve Jafarian, A. 2013. A Fuzzy Multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a Supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.
• Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J. ve Murugesan, P. 2013. Multi criteria decision making approaches
• Guneri, A. F. ve Kuzu, A. 2009. Supplier selection by using a fuzzy approach in just-in-time: A case study. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(8), 774–783.
• Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R. ve Melnyk, S. A. 2002. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment : A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 70–87.
• Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M. ve Sarkis, J. 2005. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330–353.
• Hsu, C.-W. ve Hu, A. H. 2009. Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 255–264.
• Huang, S. H. ve Keskar, H. 2007. Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(2), 510–523.
• Humphreys, P. K., McCloskey, A., McIvory, R., Maguire, L. ve Glackin, C. 2006. Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2379–2419.
• Humphreys, P. K., Wong, Y. K. ve Chan, F. T. S. 2003. Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Materials Processing Technology, 138, 349–356.
• Humphreys, P., McIvor, R. ve Chan, F. 2003. Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 141–153.
• Igarashi, M., De Boer, L. ve Fet, A. M. 2013. What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 247–263.
• Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A. ve Diabat, A. 2013. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi- objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355–367.
• Karakış, İ. 2007. Tedarikçi İlişkileri Yönetimi. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
• Kuo, R. J. ve Lin, Y. J. 2012. Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2852–2863.
• Kuo, R. J., Wang, Y. C. ve Tien, F. C. 2010. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1161–1170.
• Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C. ve Pagh, J. D. 1998. Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1–19.
• Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-F. ve Hung, H.-C. 2009. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927.
• Lu, L. Y. Y., Wu, C. H. ve Kuo, T. C. 2007. Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4317–4331.
• Mafakheri, F., Breton, M. ve Ghoniem, A. 2011. Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 132(1), 52–57.
• Metz, P. J. 1998. Demystifying supply chain management. Supply Chain Management Review, 2(4), 1–10.
• Min, H. ve Zhou, G. 2002. Supply chain modeling: Past, present and future. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 43, 231–249.
• Noci, G. 1997. Designing “green” vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(2), 103–114.
• Özdemir, A. İ. 2004. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin Gelişimi, Süreçleri ve Yararları. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Temmuz(23), 87–96.
• Özesen, E. 2009. Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ve Ambalaj Sanayinde Bir Uygulama. Marmara Üniversitesi.
• Özgen, D., Önüt, S., Gülsün, B., Tuzkaya, U. R. ve Tuzkaya, G. 2008. A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Information Sciences, 178(2), 485–500.
• Prajogo, D., Chowdhury, M., Yeung, A. C. L. ve Cheng, T. C. E. 2012. The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 123–130.
• Prajogo, D. ve Olhager, J. 2012. Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514–522.
• Sarkis, J. 2003. A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.
• Sasikumar, P. ve Haq, A. N. 2011. Integration of closed loop distribution supply chain network and 3PRLP selection for the case of battery recycling. International Journal of Production Research, 49(11), 3363–3385.
• Seuring, S. ve Müller, M. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.
• Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. ve Diabat, A. 2012. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 74, 170–179.
• Şen, S. 2007. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Tedarikçi Seçimi Sistemine Ait Bir Karar Destek Modeli Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulama Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Doktora tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
• Şen, S., Başligil, H., Şen, C. G. ve Baraçli, H. 2008. A framework for defining both qualitative and quantitative supplier selection criteria considering the buyer – supplier integration strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 46(7), 1825–1845.
• Tsai, W. H. ve Hung, S. J. 2009. A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure. International Journal of Production Research, 47(18), 4991–5017.
• Tsoulfas, G. T. ve Pappis, C. P. 2006. Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(18), 1593–1602.
• Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D. ve Tuzkaya, U. R. 2009. Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers : A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 6(3), 477–490.
• Wu, C. ve Barnes, D. 2011. A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(4), 256–274.
• Yeh, W. C. ve Chuang, M. C. 2011. Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(4), 4244–4253.
• Yu, J. R. ve Tsai, C. C. 2008. A decision framework for supplier rating and purchase allocation: A case in the semiconductor industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(3), 634–646.
• Zhu, Q. ve Geng, Y. 2001. Integrating Environmental Issues into Supplier Selection and Management. Greener Management International, 35, 27–39.
• http://www.un.org/esa/documents/ecosoc/cn17/1998/ecn171998-4.htm, 05.07.2018
• https://www.unfpa.org/world-population-trends, 05.07.2018