INVESTIGATING THE SATISFACTION LEVELS OF INDIVIDUALS WITH STROKE USING KINESIO WRISTBAND

Abstract

Aim: Kinesio Wristband was developed using the principles of neuroplasticity and biofeedback mechanism to prevent neglect of the hemiparatic upper extremity and to encourage the use of the hemiparetic upper extremity in stroke patients. If active movement does not appear in the hemiparatic upper extremity of the individual within one hour, the Kinesio Wristband will give a warning in the form of vibration. Thus, the individual will be aware that he/she should move the affected side upper extremity and use it in activities. The aim of the current study is to investigate the satisfaction levels of individuals with stroke using Kinesio Wristband. Method: The cross sectional study was conducted at the Safir Medical Center. The study included 20 stroke patients (9 females, 11 males) with a mean age of 51.50±15.37 (mean ± standard deviation) years who voluntarily received the Kinesio Wristband. Before the st udy, the level of knowledge about Kinesio Wristband and the level of belief in its functionality were questioned with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) questionnaire was used to question the satisfaction of the individuals after using the Kinesio Wristband for 4 weeks. Results: The mean level of knowledge about the Kinesio Wristband was 2.95±1.39 (min 0 max 7) and the mean level of belief in its functionality was 3.65±1.27 (min 1 max 5). The mean score of the ‘assistive device’ heading of QUEST was 28.55± (7.42) (min 21 max 40) out of 40 points; the mean score of the ‘service’ heading of QUEST was 16.10± (2.99) (min 12 max 20) out of 20 points. As a result of the participants' sel ection of the 3 items that they considered the most important among the 12 items related to satisfaction with QUEST, it was found that individuals selected regular follow up services with 30% (n:12), professional service with 20% (n:8), weight, ease of use and comfort with 12.5% (n: Conclusion: Individuals with stroke reported high assistive device and service satisfaction with Kinesio Wristband. The appearance, weight, ease of use, durability and satisfaction of the assistive devices used in rehabilitation positively affect the success of rehab ilitation. The Kinesio Wristband has the potential to be used in individuals with stroke, but there is a need to improve the current version of the device.

Keywords

• Kinesio-Wristband
• Stroke
• Satisfaction
• Rehabilitation
• Assistive Device

References

1. Alt Murphy, M., Persson, H. C., Danielsson, A., Broeren, J., Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2011). SALGOT-Stroke Arm Longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg, prospective cohort study protocol. BMC neurology, 11(1), 1-9.
2. Appelros, P., Stegmayr, B., & Terént, A. (2009). Go Red for Women.
3. Aydın, A., Araz, A., & Asan, A. (2011). Görsel analog ölçeği ve duygu kafesi: Kültürümüze uyarlama çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 14(27), 1-13.
4. Boehme, A. K., Esenwa, C., & Elkind, M. S. (2017). Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circulation research, 120(3), 472-495.
5. Burke, E., & Cramer, S. C. (2013). Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 13, 1-10.
6. Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D., & Wolfson, C. (2002). Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and rehabilitation, 24(1-3), 21-30.
7. Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (1996). Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 8(1), 3-13.
8. Dymarek, R., Ptaszkowski, K., Słupska, L., Halski, T., Taradaj, J., & Rosińczuk, J. (2016). Effects of extracorporeal shock wave on upper and lower limb spasticity in post-stroke patients: a narrative review. Topics in Stroke rehabilitation, 23(4), 293-303.

9. Feigin, V. L., Stark, B. A., Johnson, C. O., Roth, G. A., Bisignano, C., Abady, G. G., Abbasifard, M., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abd-Allah, F., & Abedi, V. (2021). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Neurology, 20(10), 795-820.
10. Fernando, C., & Basmajian, J. (1978). Biofeedback in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Biofeedback and Self-regulation, 3, 435-455.
11. Go, A. S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V. L., Benjamin, E. J., Berry, J. D., Blaha, M. J., Dai, S., Ford, E. S., Fox, C. S., & Franco, S. (2014). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 129(3), e28-e292.
12. Götz, M., & Jarriault, S. (2017). Programming and reprogramming the brain: a meeting of minds in neural fate. Development, 144(15), 2714-2718.
13. Grundy, S. M., Cleeman, J. I., Daniels, S. R., Donato, K. A., Eckel, R. H., Franklin, B. A., Gordon, D. J., Krauss, R. M., Savage, P. J., & Smith Jr, S. C. (2005). Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation, 112(17), 2735-2752.
14. Holz, E. M., Höhne, J., Staiger-Sälzer, P., Tangermann, M., & Kübler, A. (2013). Brain–computer interface controlled gaming: Evaluation of usability by severely motor restricted end-users. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 59(2), 111-120.
15. Jickling, G. C., & Sharp, F. R. (2011). Blood biomarkers of ischemic stroke. Neurotherapeutics, 8, 349-360.
16. Johnson, C. O., Nguyen, M., Roth, G. A., Nichols, E., Alam, T., Abate, D., Abd-Allah, F., Abdelalim, A., Abraha, H. N., & Abu-Rmeileh, N. M. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(5), 439-458.
17. Jönsson, A.-C., Lindgren, I., Hallström, B., Norrving, B., & Lindgren, A. (2006). Prevalence and intensity of pain after stroke: a population based study focusing on patients’ perspectives. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 77(5), 590-595.
18. Lin, D. J., Finklestein, S. P., & Cramer, S. C. (2018). New directions in treatments targeting stroke recovery. Stroke, 49(12), 3107-3114.
19. Lin, M. P., & Liebeskind, D. S. (2016). Imaging of ischemic stroke. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology, 22(5), 1399.
20. Musmar, B., Adeeb, N., Ansari, J., Sharma, P., & Cuellar, H. H. (2022). Endovascular Management of Hemorrhagic Stroke. Biomedicines, 10(1), 100.
21. Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001). Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(19), 1450-1460.
22. Reeves, M. J., Bushnell, C. D., Howard, G., Gargano, J. W., Duncan, P. W., Lynch, G., Khatiwoda, A., & Lisabeth, L. (2008). Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. The Lancet Neurology, 7(10), 915-926.
23. Roger, V. (2011). Go AS Lloyd-Jones DM Adams RJ Berry JD Brown TM Carnethon MR Dai S. de Simone G. Ford ES Fox CS Fullerton HJ Gillespie C. Greenlund KJ Hailpern SM Heit JA Ho PM Howard VJ Kissela BM Kittner SJ Lackland DT Lichtman JH Lisabeth LD Makuc DM Marcus GM Marelli A. Matchar DB McDermott MM Meigs JB Moy CS Mozaffarian D. Mussolino ME Nichol G. Paynter NP Rosamond WD Sorlie PD Stafford RS Turan TN Turner MB Wong ND Wylie-Rosett J. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 123(4), e18-e209.
24. Sacco, R. L., Kasner, S. E., Broderick, J. P., Caplan, L. R., Connors, J., Culebras, A., Elkind, M. S., George, M. G., Hamdan, A. D., & Higashida, R. T. (2013). An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 44(7), 2064-2089.
25. Samuelkamaleshkumar, S., Reethajanetsureka, S., Pauljebaraj, P., Benshamir, B., Padankatti, S. M., & David, J. A. (2014). Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 95(11), 2000-2005.
26. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (1991). Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Practice (Champaign, IL. IL. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books.
27. Tate, J. J., & Milner, C. E. (2010). Real-time kinematic, temporospatial, and kinetic biofeedback during gait retraining in patients: a systematic review. Physical therapy, 90(8), 1123-1134.
28. Voss, P., Thomas, M. E., Cisneros-Franco, J. M., & de Villers-Sidani, É. (2017). Dynamic brains and the changing rules of neuroplasticity: implications for learning and recovery. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1657. Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., & Harvey, R. L. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 47(6), e98-e169.
29. Wu, C.-Y., Huang, P.-C., Chen, Y.-T., Lin, K.-C., & Yang, H.-W. (2013). Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 94(6), 1023-1030.
30. Yakut, Y., Yasin, Y., Yagcı, G., & Simsek, E. (2020). Quebec Yardımcı Teknoloji Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Değerlendirme 2.0 Anketi’nin protez ve ortez kullanan bireylerde Türkçe adaptasyonu. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 7(3), 284-295.