Research Article

Effects of Leadership Types on Job Satisfaction Among Malaysian Higher Education Institutions

Volume: 10 Number: 1 June 30, 2022
TR EN

Effects of Leadership Types on Job Satisfaction Among Malaysian Higher Education Institutions

Öz

Employee job satisfaction is an important component of any job and could be influenced by different types of leadership. Keeping employees happy and satisfied while at the same time being a great leader is an extremely difficult balance, especially in educational leadership, where there are two different types of employees, mainly administrators, and educators. It requires a leader who can balance between the lines and choose the proper leadership style to motivate different types of employees. This study looks at three different leadership types: laissez-faire, transformational and transactional leadership. A purposeful sampling of 393 participants was utilized to sample educators from Malaysia's private and governmental education institutions. Data were collected using questionnaires. The findings indicated that transformational leadership and laissez-faire have a significant relationship to job satisfaction where laissez-faire (β = 0.608, t = 16.576, p = 0.000) and transformational leadership (β = 0.865, t = 8.498; p = 0.000), while transactional leadership has an insignificant relationship with job satisfaction (β = -0.019, t = 0.747, p = 0.227).

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

  1. Abrahman, Z., Awang, J., Mahmood, R., Long, A. S., Salleh, K., & Badaruddin, F. (2018). Leadership Style of the Residential College Principal in National University of Malaysia and the Staff Working Satisfaction: Towards the Professional Development of Residential College Principal. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(3), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v9n3p19
  2. Albagawi, B. (2019). Leadership Styles of Nurse Managers and Job Satisfaction of Staff Nurses: Correlational Design Study. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n3p254
  3. Arokiasamy, L., Maimunah, I., Aminah, A., & Jamilah, O. (2009). Background of Malaysian Private Institutions of Higher Learning and Challenges Faced by Academics. The Journal of International Social Research, 2/8(January), 61–66.
  4. Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., & Prasetya, A. B. (2020). Elitical and Antidemocratic Transformational Leadership Critics: Is It Still Relevant? (A Literature Study). International Journal of Sociology, Policy and Law (Ijospl), 01(01), 11–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v1i1.10
  5. Asghar, S., & Oino, I. (2018). Leadership Styles and Job Satisfaction. Market Force, 13(1).
  6. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2005.03.001
  7. Aziri, B. (2011). Job Satisfaction: A literature Review. Management Research and Practice, 31(4), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1254/jjp.31.1037
  8. Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Iverson, R. D. (2003). High-quality work, job satisfaction, and occupational injuries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.276

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Rosnizah Shaarı This is me
Malaysia

Ju Soon Yew This is me
Malaysia

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

December 16, 2021

Acceptance Date

June 30, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 10 Number: 1

APA
Shaarı, R., Kamarudin, D., Soon Yew, J., & Zakaria, H. (2022). Effects of Leadership Types on Job Satisfaction Among Malaysian Higher Education Institutions. Asian Journal of Instruction (E-AJI), 10(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1020324

Cited By