STRENGTH, CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS OF FACULTY IN COLLEGE TEACHING

Öz

Faculty members are not only expected to conduct a scientific research but also to possess adequate professional teaching. As a result of this, faculty development is an important highlight in improving the teaching skills of each individual faculty member. This study delves into how faculty views their strengths and the challenges in the process of college teaching as well as how they maintain their professional development and solve problems about the teaching process. The participants are faculty members in College of Arts and Sciences, College of Business Administration, and College of Education, Health, and Human Services at a well-known U.S University. The research methodology is based on phenomenological inquiry. In this research, the central phenomenon is the lived experiences of the faculty throughout their professional development. In line with research questions, a survey is designed by researchers. Of all the question items, seven (7) questions inquire personal information; the other question sets, six open-ended and four closed-ended, are directly addressing the aim of the research. Faculty who take part in the research are asked to fill out an online survey about their strengths, challenges and ways of solutions in their professional development efforts. The data collected from 80 faculty members were analyzed. Closed-ended questions are analyzed through frequency and percentage values, while open-ended questions contribute to the qualitative investigation. Content analysis was conducted for the open-ended questions. Analyses of the data regarding the themes which faculty feel confident or perceive as challenges indicate that technology is an area where they both enjoy and suffer from. The other themes include course planning, instructional methods, preparing teaching materials, classroom management, monitoring students’ progress and achieving rapport with students. As for the solution, they anonymously agreed upon several concepts, including Training and preparation, Technical support, Keeping up-to-date, Researching, Professional method and Personal characteristics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Training and preparation

References

1. Aldhafeeri, F. & Male, T. (2016). Investigating the learning challenges presented by digital technologies to the College of Education in Kuwait University. Education and Information Technologies. 21,1509-1519 doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9396-2.
2. Alemu, B. M. (2015). Integrating ICT into Teaching-Learning Practices: Promise, Challenges and Future Directions of Higher Educational Institutes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(3), 170-189.
3. Altstaedter, L. L. (2007). Book Review: What the Best College Teachers Do. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.19(3), 336-337 Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlh
4. Bain, K., (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Changa T-S., C.*, Lin. H-H., and & Songs. M-M., (2011). University faculty members’ perceptions of their teaching efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48 (1), 49–60.
6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods series). New York: SAGE Publications Ltd.
7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Free Press.
8. Diamond, R.M. (2002). Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development: Options and Choices. In K.H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen & E. C.

9. Wadsworth (Eds). A guide to faculty development, practical advice, examples, and resources. (pp. 2-8). Bolton, MA: Anker
10. EACEA P9 Eurydice - the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (2012). The European Higher Education Area in 2012: Bologna Process Implementation Report. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice
11. Huston T. and C. V. Weaver (2008). Peer Coaching: Professional Development for Experienced Faculty. Innov High Educ 33:5–20
12. Lee, V. S. (2012). Opportunities and challenges in institutionalizing inquiry-guided learning in colleges and universities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (129), 105-116.
13. Lei, S. (2007). Teaching practices of instructors in two community colleges in a western state. Education, 128 (1), 148-160.
14. Moodley, P. (2015). STUDENT OVERLOAD AT UNIVERSITY: LARGE CLASS TEACHING CHALLENGES. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(3).
15. Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and Opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education (15) 2, 175-185.
16. Rutz, C. Condon, W., Iverson E. R., Cathryn, A.M. & Gudrun W. (2012). Faculty Professional Development and Student Learning: What is the Relationship? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 44(3), 40-47
17. Sorcinalli M. D. (2002). Ten principles of good practice in creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers. In K.H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen & E. C. Wadsworth (Eds). A guide to faculty development, practical advice, examples, and resources. (pp. 9-23). Bolton, MA: Anker
18. Sorcinelli, M. D. (2007). Faculty development: The challenge going forward. Peer Review, 9(4).
19. UNESCO/ILO (2008). The ILO/UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers (1966) and the UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel (1997). Retrieved from
20. Yıldırım, A. and H. Şimşek (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık