Posterior Malleolar Fractures: Current Concepts in Classification, Diagnosis, and Management
Abstract
Posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) accompany 7-44% of ankle fractures and remain controversial in terms of treatment. This review summarizes current concepts in classification, diagnosis, and management of posterior malleolar fractures. The anatomical importance of the posterior malleolus is emphasized, particularly as the posterior tibiofibular ligament contributes to 42% of syndesmotic stability. For diagnosis, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) imaging is considered the gold standard in addition to standard radiographs. The three most commonly used classification systems are Haraguchi, Bartoníček/Rammelt, and Mason classifications. The treatment approach should be based on multifactorial evaluation including fracture morphology, joint incongruity, posterior subluxation, and syndesmotic instability, rather than fragment size alone. Conservative treatment is appropriate for minimally displaced fractures, while surgical indications include fragments comprising more than 25% of the joint surface, displacement greater than 2 mm, or syndesmotic instability. Surgical treatment modalities include closed reduction with screw fixation, posterolateral, and posteromedial open approaches. Long-term studies have reported generally favorable functional outcomes after appropriately managed ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragments; however, residual articular incongruity, fracture-dislocation, and inadequate reduction have been associated with poorer long-term outcomes and post-traumatic osteoarthritic changes. In conclusion, individualized treatment strategies and restoration of joint congruence are critical for optimal outcomes.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Ethical Statement
References
- Bartoníček, J., Rammelt, S., Kostlivý, K., Vaněček, V., Klika, D., & Trešl, I. (2015). Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 135(4), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4
- Bartoníček, J., Rammelt, S., & Tuček, M. (2017). Posterior Malleolar Fractures: Changing Concepts and Recent Developments. Foot and Ankle Clinics, 22(1), 125– 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2016.09.009
- Bartoníček, J., Rammelt, S., Tuček, M., & Naňka, O. (2015). Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery: Official Publication of the European Trauma Society, 41(6), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0560-6
- Batar, S., & Şişman, A. (2023). Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior screw fixation techniques for posterior malleolar fractures: A retrospective and clinical study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi = Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery: TJTES, 29(12), 1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.66204
- Baumbach, S. F., Herterich, V., Damblemont, A., Hieber, F., Böcker, W., & Polzer, H. (2019). Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolus fragment frequently restores syndesmotic stability. Injury, 50(2), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.025
- Bingol, O., Ozdemir, G., Karlidag, T., Korucu, A., Yasar, N. E., & Deveci, A. (2023). Impact of Posterior Malleolus Fixation on Clinical and Functional Results. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 113(1), 21–008. https://doi.org/10.7547/21-008
- Blom, R. P., Hayat, B., Al-Dirini, R. M. A., Sierevelt, I., Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J., Goslings, J. C., Jaarsma, R. L., Doornberg, J. N., & EF3X-trial Study Group. (2020). Posterior malleolar ankle fractures. The Bone & Joint Journal, 102-B(9), 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2019- 1660.R1
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Orthopaedics
Journal Section
Review
Authors
Kemal Andıç
*
Türkiye
Publication Date
June 14, 2026
Submission Date
January 8, 2026
Acceptance Date
May 21, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 2 Number: 2