Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi

Year 2005, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 295 - 300, 01.09.2005

Abstract

Araştırmanın amacı, monogerm triploid hibrit şeker pancarı çeşidi ıslah etmek için erkısır ebeveynleri seçmektir. Erkısırlıktan yararlanılarak elde edilen monogerm triploid hibrit şeker pancarı çeşitleri (Beta vulgaris subspp saccarifera), dünyada geniş alanlarda ekilmektedir. Populasyonda, erkısır bitkilerin morfolojik olarak ayırt edilmesi oldukça kolay olduğu halde, O-Tip bitkilerin belirlenmesi için döl testi melezi yapmak gerekir. Araştırma, 1984-1996 yılları arasında, Şeker Enstitüsü’nün Ankara ve Adapazarı’ndaki tohum üretim tarlalarında yapılmıştır. 21 adet anisoploid populasyondan, kromozom sayımı ile, diploid ve tetraploid bitkiler seçilmiştir. Çiçeklenme döneminde, populasyonlara ait toplam 231.424 bitki, erkısırlık bakımından kontrol edilerek toplam 190 adet erkısır bitki tespit edilmiştir. Bu bitkilerden alınan tohumlar ekilmiş ve yetiştirilen fideler vernelizasyona tabi tutulduktan sonra sapa kaldırılmıştır. Bu bitkilerin dölleri arasında erkısırlık oranları belirlenmiştir. Erkısır bitki oranlarının populasyonlara göre % 3.17-18.84 arasında değiştiği saptanmıştır. Aynı populasyondaki erkısırlık oranı ile O-Tip bitki oranı arasındaki korelasyonlara bağlı olarak yapılan hesaplamalarla, populasyonlarda döl testine tabi tutulması gereken bitki sayılarının 24-148 arasında değiştiği bulunmuştur

References

  • Banlow, G. 1964. Die genetic der Beta vulgaris- Rüben. Zuchter, 25: 104-122.
  • Cleij, G. 1967. Influencing of the cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility in beets. Euphytica, 16: 123-128.
  • Curth, P. 1967. Blühindüktion bei zückerrübensteckligen durch intermittiert gebontenes mütternachtlinches störlicht. Zuhter, 37: 119-120.
  • Gerald, M. C. and Stewart, D. 1977. Cytoplasmic male sterility, self-fertility and monogermness in Beta maritima L. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., 19: 257-261.
  • Guan, G., Abe, D and Shimamoto, Y. 1994. Genetic analysis of bolting tendency in sugarbeet. Proc. Jap. Soc. Sugar Beet Technologists, 36: 145-151.
  • Hagihara, E., Itchoda, N., Kuba, T., Habu, Y., Lida S. and Mikami, T. 1999. AFLP and RAPD markers tightly linked to fertility restorer genes for the Owen cytoplasmic male sterility in sugarbeet. Proc. Jap. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., 41: 73-77.
  • Hogaboam, G. 1967. Factors influencing phenotype expression of cytoplasmic male sterility in the sugar beets. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Technologists, 9: 457-465.
  • Kleon, D. 1967. Die ausnutzung der heterosis bei di-und tetraploiden rüben. Aus. Tag. Ber. dt. Akad. Landwirtsch. W. Berlin, 89: 275-294.
  • Koç, H. 1983. Selection O-Type parent in sugarbeet for male sterile breeding. Ph. D. Thesis, Ankara Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Koç, H. 1988a. Investigation on the obtaining O- Type plant in the sugarbeet populations. T. J. Agric. For. 12: 144-153.
  • Koç, H. 1988b. Using methods from self-fertile sugarbeet populations for O-Type investigations. T. J. Agric. For., 12: 154- 158.
  • Koç, H. 1988c.The vegetative keeping techniques of the clones for O-Type investigations. T. J. Agric. For., 12: 158-162.
  • Koç, H. 1989a. Investigation of male sterile plants in Turkseker-I’s breeding lines. T. J. Agric. For., 13: 607-615.
  • Koç, H. 1989b. Improvement new inbred lines in different anisoploid populations. T. J. Agric. For., 13: 623-630.
  • Koç, H. 1989c. Investigations on identified O-Type plant in different breeding lines. T. J. Agric. For., 13: 616-623.
  • Koç, H. 1992. Investigation on the methods of the bolting to sugarbeet in a year. Hasad 47: 26- 29.
  • Koc, H. and Kandemir, N. 1992. Investigation of O-Type plant using plant tissue culture technique. XI. National Biology Congress, 24-27 July, Elazig, Turkey, s, 181-188.
  • Koc, H., Kasap, A., Akdag, C., Gökmen S. and Akman, Z. 1995. Determination of the O- Type plants from self-fertil and self-sterile monogerm sugarbeet populations. Gaziosmanpasa Uni. J. Agriculture., 12: 172-181.
  • Koc, H. 2001. Use of in vitro propagation for CMS maintainer line screening in sugar beet population. USAMV-CN, p, 297-302.
  • Lecochec, F. 1969. Les possibilities d’amelioration de la betterave fourragere (Beta vulgaris L.) Ann. Amelior. Plantes. 19: 169-211.
  • Margara, J. 1954. Les problemes annexes la selection de betterave. Ann. L’Amelior. Plants. 2: 179-184.
  • Orlov, S. D. 2000. Improvement of the O-Type lines and their inter-cultivar analogues. Sakharnaya Svekla, 12: 14-15.
  • Owen, F. V. 1945. Cytoplasmic inherited male sterility in sugar beet. J. Amer. Agr. Res., 71: 423-439.
  • Owen, F. V., Murphy, A. M. and Ryser, G. K. 1946. Inbred lines from Curly-top resistant varieties of sugarbeet. Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., p, 246-252.
  • Owen, F. V. 1948. Utilization of male sterility in bereeding superior yielding sugarbeets. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., p, 156-161.
  • Owen, F. V. 1950. The sugar beet breeders problems of establishing male sterile population for hybridization purposes. Proc. Amer. Sugar Beet Techn., 6: 191-194.
  • Panella, L. W. and Hecker, R. J. 1995. Registration of annual O-Type and CMS sugarbeet germplasm lines FC404 and FC404CMS. Crop Sci. 35: 1721.
  • Savitsky, H. 1952. Poliploid sugar beets, cytologically study and methods of production. Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugarbeet Techn., 7: 470-476.
  • Schoroter, W. 1966. Breeding male sterile monocarpic sugarbeets. Tag. Ber. dt. Akad. Landwirtsch. W. Berlin, 89: 303-319.
  • Tatlıoglu, T. 1978. Investigation of male sterile plants in sugarbeet populations. Plant, 5: 1- 15.
  • Zinecker, M., Schoroter, W. and Behrens, H. O. 1975. Results of work on the production of O-Type of sugarbeet. Archiv für Züchtungsforschung, 5: 123-132.

Investigation of Male Sterility in Sugarbeet Populations

Year 2005, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 295 - 300, 01.09.2005

Abstract

The main aim of this research was to select male sterile parents for breed triploid monogerm sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris subspp saccarifera) cultivars. Monogerm triploid hybrid sugarbeet cultivars that obtained using cytoplasmic male sterility have been grown over large areas throughout the world. Identification of male sterile plant is easy; however, O-type plants need progeny test for identification. The experiment was conducted in the fields of seed production of Sugar Institute in Adapazarı and Ankara during 1984-1996. Diploid and tetraploid plants were selected by using chromosome counts from 21 anisoploid populations. During the flowering season, 231.424 plants were examined for fertility, and 190 plants were identified as male sterile. The seeds obtained from these plants were used to grow seedlings which were bolted and checked for the extent of sterility after vernalization. Male sterile progeny ratios of these plants varied between 3.17 % and 18.84 % from population to population. A possitive and strong correlation was found between male sterile plant ratio and O-Type plant ratio within the same population. Based on this correlation, numbers of progeny test were calculated as between 24-148 for the populations.

References

  • Banlow, G. 1964. Die genetic der Beta vulgaris- Rüben. Zuchter, 25: 104-122.
  • Cleij, G. 1967. Influencing of the cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility in beets. Euphytica, 16: 123-128.
  • Curth, P. 1967. Blühindüktion bei zückerrübensteckligen durch intermittiert gebontenes mütternachtlinches störlicht. Zuhter, 37: 119-120.
  • Gerald, M. C. and Stewart, D. 1977. Cytoplasmic male sterility, self-fertility and monogermness in Beta maritima L. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., 19: 257-261.
  • Guan, G., Abe, D and Shimamoto, Y. 1994. Genetic analysis of bolting tendency in sugarbeet. Proc. Jap. Soc. Sugar Beet Technologists, 36: 145-151.
  • Hagihara, E., Itchoda, N., Kuba, T., Habu, Y., Lida S. and Mikami, T. 1999. AFLP and RAPD markers tightly linked to fertility restorer genes for the Owen cytoplasmic male sterility in sugarbeet. Proc. Jap. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., 41: 73-77.
  • Hogaboam, G. 1967. Factors influencing phenotype expression of cytoplasmic male sterility in the sugar beets. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Technologists, 9: 457-465.
  • Kleon, D. 1967. Die ausnutzung der heterosis bei di-und tetraploiden rüben. Aus. Tag. Ber. dt. Akad. Landwirtsch. W. Berlin, 89: 275-294.
  • Koç, H. 1983. Selection O-Type parent in sugarbeet for male sterile breeding. Ph. D. Thesis, Ankara Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Koç, H. 1988a. Investigation on the obtaining O- Type plant in the sugarbeet populations. T. J. Agric. For. 12: 144-153.
  • Koç, H. 1988b. Using methods from self-fertile sugarbeet populations for O-Type investigations. T. J. Agric. For., 12: 154- 158.
  • Koç, H. 1988c.The vegetative keeping techniques of the clones for O-Type investigations. T. J. Agric. For., 12: 158-162.
  • Koç, H. 1989a. Investigation of male sterile plants in Turkseker-I’s breeding lines. T. J. Agric. For., 13: 607-615.
  • Koç, H. 1989b. Improvement new inbred lines in different anisoploid populations. T. J. Agric. For., 13: 623-630.
  • Koç, H. 1989c. Investigations on identified O-Type plant in different breeding lines. T. J. Agric. For., 13: 616-623.
  • Koç, H. 1992. Investigation on the methods of the bolting to sugarbeet in a year. Hasad 47: 26- 29.
  • Koc, H. and Kandemir, N. 1992. Investigation of O-Type plant using plant tissue culture technique. XI. National Biology Congress, 24-27 July, Elazig, Turkey, s, 181-188.
  • Koc, H., Kasap, A., Akdag, C., Gökmen S. and Akman, Z. 1995. Determination of the O- Type plants from self-fertil and self-sterile monogerm sugarbeet populations. Gaziosmanpasa Uni. J. Agriculture., 12: 172-181.
  • Koc, H. 2001. Use of in vitro propagation for CMS maintainer line screening in sugar beet population. USAMV-CN, p, 297-302.
  • Lecochec, F. 1969. Les possibilities d’amelioration de la betterave fourragere (Beta vulgaris L.) Ann. Amelior. Plantes. 19: 169-211.
  • Margara, J. 1954. Les problemes annexes la selection de betterave. Ann. L’Amelior. Plants. 2: 179-184.
  • Orlov, S. D. 2000. Improvement of the O-Type lines and their inter-cultivar analogues. Sakharnaya Svekla, 12: 14-15.
  • Owen, F. V. 1945. Cytoplasmic inherited male sterility in sugar beet. J. Amer. Agr. Res., 71: 423-439.
  • Owen, F. V., Murphy, A. M. and Ryser, G. K. 1946. Inbred lines from Curly-top resistant varieties of sugarbeet. Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., p, 246-252.
  • Owen, F. V. 1948. Utilization of male sterility in bereeding superior yielding sugarbeets. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn., p, 156-161.
  • Owen, F. V. 1950. The sugar beet breeders problems of establishing male sterile population for hybridization purposes. Proc. Amer. Sugar Beet Techn., 6: 191-194.
  • Panella, L. W. and Hecker, R. J. 1995. Registration of annual O-Type and CMS sugarbeet germplasm lines FC404 and FC404CMS. Crop Sci. 35: 1721.
  • Savitsky, H. 1952. Poliploid sugar beets, cytologically study and methods of production. Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugarbeet Techn., 7: 470-476.
  • Schoroter, W. 1966. Breeding male sterile monocarpic sugarbeets. Tag. Ber. dt. Akad. Landwirtsch. W. Berlin, 89: 303-319.
  • Tatlıoglu, T. 1978. Investigation of male sterile plants in sugarbeet populations. Plant, 5: 1- 15.
  • Zinecker, M., Schoroter, W. and Behrens, H. O. 1975. Results of work on the production of O-Type of sugarbeet. Archiv für Züchtungsforschung, 5: 123-132.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

H. Koç This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 18 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Koç, H. (2005). Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 18(2), 295-300.
AMA Koç H. Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. September 2005;18(2):295-300.
Chicago Koç, H. “Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 18, no. 2 (September 2005): 295-300.
EndNote Koç H (September 1, 2005) Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 18 2 295–300.
IEEE H. Koç, “Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi”, Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 295–300, 2005.
ISNAD Koç, H. “Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 18/2 (September 2005), 295-300.
JAMA Koç H. Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 2005;18:295–300.
MLA Koç, H. “Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, vol. 18, no. 2, 2005, pp. 295-00.
Vancouver Koç H. Şeker Pancari Populasyonlarinda Erkisirlik Arastirmasi. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 2005;18(2):295-300.