Bitki lslahında DNA Markerlarının Kullanımı

Year 1996, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 322 - 333, 01.12.1996

A. Naci Onus

Abstract

DNA markerları kantitatif biyoloji içerisinde sorulan pek çok kompleks sorunun cevaplanmasında önemli bir araç olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır ve bitki ıslahı ve bitki genetiğinin çeşitli alanlarında kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu markerlar taksonomi, populasyonlarda görülen varyasyonlar ve uyuşma sistemleri gibi temel çalışma alanlarında kullanılmaktadır. Moleküler markerlar doğal olarak oluştukları, fenotip üzerine olumsuz bir etkileri olmadığı ve çevre koşullarından etkilenmedikleri için son derece faydalıdırlar. Şu anda günümüzde kabul edilen genel inanç genetik markerlar gelecekde ziraate ve biyolojik bilimlere önemli katkılarda bulunacaktır.

Keywords

Bitki lslahı, DNA, taxonomy

DNA Markers in Plant Improvement

Abstract

DNA markers are important tools for detailed investigation of compleks questions in quantiative biology and they are beginning to be used in many aspects of plant genetics and breeding. They have been applied to basic studies of taxonomy, variability of populations and mating systems. Molecular markers are quite useful because they are naturally occuring, have very few negative effects on phenotype, and are not subject to environmental influence. It is believed that genetic markers will make a major contribution to the biological Sciences, especially agriculture, for the foreseeable future.

Keywords

Plant Improvement, DNA, taxonomy

References

• 1.. Andrew H. Paterson, Steven D.Tanksley, and Mark E. Sorrels. DNA markers in plant improvement. Advances in plant Agronomy Vol, 46, 1991.
• 2. P. Arus and J, Moreno Gonzalez. Marker assisted selection. Plant Breeding. Eds. M.D. Hayward, N O. Bosemark, I.Romagosa, pp. 314-332, 1993.
• 3. Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnik, M., and Davis, R. W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using RFLP, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32, 314-331, 1980.
• 4. Rick, C. M. and Fobes, J.F. Association of an allozyme with nematode resistance. Rep. Tomato Genet. Coop., 24, 25. 1974.
• 5. Young, N.D, Zamir, D, Ganal, M.W. and Tanksley, S.D. Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to Tm-2a gene in Tomato Geietics. 120, 579-583. 1988.
• 6. Etst, E M. Studies on size inheritance in Nicotiana. Genetics. 1, 164-176. 1915
• 7. Gelderman. H..Investigations on inheritance of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers. I. Methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 46. 319-330. 1975.
• 8. Tanksley, S.D., Medina-Fiiho, H. and Rick, C M. Use of naturally occruring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Heredity, 49, 11-25. 1982,
• 9. Osborn, T.C., Alexander, D C. and Fobes , J.F. Identication of restriction fragment length polymorphisms linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit. Theo. Appl. Genet.,73, 350-356. 1987.
• 10. Weller, J.I. Mapping and analsis of quantitative trait loci in Lycopersicon (tomato) with the aid of genetic markers using approximate maximum likelihoods method. Heredity. 59,413-421. 1987.
• 11. Tanksley, S.D. and Hewitt, J. Use of molecular markers in breeding for soluble solids content in tomato. A re-examination. Theor. Appl. Genet., 75, 811-823. 1988,
• 12. Martin ., G.B., Williams, J.G.K and Tanksley, S.D. Rapid identication markers linked to a Pseudomanas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers nad near-isogenic lines. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 88, 2336-2340. 1991.
• 13. Stuber, C.W., Edwards, M.D. and Wendel, J,F. Molecular marker faciliated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. II Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop. Sci., 27. 639-648. 1987.
• 14. Lander, E.S., Botstein, D. MappingMendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 121, 185-199. 1989.
• 15. Paterson, A.H., Lander, E.S. Hewitt, J.D., Paterson, S., Lincoln, S.E. and Tanksley, S.D. Resolution of quantitative frits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature, 335, 721-726. 1988.
• 16. Soller, M., and Beckman, J,S, Genetic polymorphism in varietal identication and genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet., 67, 25-33. 1983.
• 17. Edwards, M.D., Stuber, C.W. and Wendel J.F. Molecular marker-faciliated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distrubition and types of gene action, Genetics, 116, 113-125. 1987.
• 18. East, E.M. Inbreeding in com. Rep. Conn. Agric. Exp, Stn. 1907 pp. 419-428. 1908.
• 19. Bruce, A.B. The Mendelian theory of heredity and augmentation of vigor. Science, 32,627-628. 1910.
• 20. Keeble, F., and Pellew, C. The mode of inheritance of stature and flowering time in peas (Pisum sativum). J. Genet. 1, 47-56. 1910.
• 21. Allard, R.W. Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness tn cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. J. Hered 79, 225-238. 1988.
• 22. Allard, R.W. Principles of plant breeding, Wiley, New York.
• 23. Figdore, S.S, Kennard, W.C., Song, K.M., Slocum, M.K., and Osborn T.C, Assesment of the degree of restriction fragment length polymorphism in Brassica. Theor Appl. Genet., 75, 833-840. 1988.
• 24. Gebhardt, C., Blomendahl, C., Schaehtschabel, U., U., Debener, T., Salamİni, F., and Ritter, E. Identifacation of 2n inbreeding lines and 4n varieties of potato (Solanum tuberosum, ssp. tuberosum) with RFLP fingerprints. Theor. App. Genet. 78. 16-22. 1989.
• 25. Burr, B., Evola, S.V., Burr, F.A., and Becmann, J.S. The application of restriction fragment length polymorphism to plant breeding. In "Genetic Engineering" Vol.5. Plenum New York.
• 26. Lande R., and Thompson, R. Efficiency of marker assisted selection in the plant improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 124, 743-756.
• 27. Young, N.D., and Tanksley, S.D. RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet., 77, 353-359. 1989.
• 28. Hanson. W.D. Early generation analysis of lengths of heterozygous chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrosssing or selfing. Genetics, 44, 833-837. 1959.
• 29. Dewey, D.R. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. Stadler Genet. Symp. 16, 209-281. 1984.
• 30. Bonierbale, M.W., Plaisted, R. L., and Tanksley, S.D. RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics, 120, 1095-1103.1988.
• 31. Prince, P,J., Pochard, E., Tanksley, S.D. Construction of molecular linkage map of pepper and comparison of syntheny with tomato, Genome, 36,404-417. 1993.