Forum: Fostering Cooperation in Conflict Research Beyond Borders

Abstract

In this forum article, we examine the state of the field of Peace and Conflict Studies in providing a platform to incorporate local knowledge to generate global insights. Many scholars in peace and conflict studies have traditionally relied on cross-national empirical analyses to investigate conflict dynamics, which can present opportunities for increased level of collaboration, methodological advancement, and interdisciplinary works. Whereas Western-oriented institutions and approaches serve as the locomotive of the production in the field, the vast majority of their data locates in non-Western contexts with diverse cultural, political, social, linguistic, and economic settings. Hence, the overarching theme of this forum emphasizes the benefits of an empirically-driven, methodologically rigorous research agenda that strongly incorporates local knowledge. We offer a platform to discuss the limits and prospects of Global North- South cooperation, the challenges of gathering dependable data, and the ways to overcome these issues while maintaining academic integrity and deepening our understanding of conflict dynamics. We believe that sustained investment in collaborative partnerships and capacity-building initiatives will be critical for unlocking the full potential of local expertise and insights in advancing knowledge-production and fostering peace and stability in conflict-affected areas.

Keywords

• Peace and Conflict Studies
• Local Knowledge
• Global North-South Collaboration
• Methodological Advancement

References

1. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. “Why is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years On.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17, no. 3 (2017): 341–70.
2. Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647-659.
3. Aksnes, Dag W., and Gunnar Sivertsen. “Global Trends in International Research Collaboration, 1980-2021.” Journal of Data and Information Science 8, no. 2 (2023): 26-42.
4. Aksoy, Deniz. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Counterterrorism.” The Journal of Politics 80, no. 4 (2018): 1239-1253.
5. Alejandro, Audrey. “The Narrative of Academic Dominance: How to Overcome Performing the” Core-Periphery” Divide.” International Studies Review 19, no. 2 (2017): 300-309.
6. Autesserre, Séverine. “International Peacebuilding and Local Success: Assumptions and Effectiveness.” International Studies Review 19, no. 1 (2017): 114-13.
7. Aydinli, Ersel, and Onur Erpul. “The False Promise of Global IR: Exposing the Paradox of Dependent Development.” International Theory 14, no. 3 (2022): 419-459.
8. Beardsley, Kyle, David E. Cunningham, and Peter B. White. “Resolving Civil Wars before They Start: The UN Security Council and Conflict Prevention in Self-determination Disputes.” British Journal of Political Science 47, no. 3 (2017): 675-697.

9. Beckmann, Nicholas A., and Onur Erpul. “Realism’s Timeless Wisdom and its Relevance for the Global South.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 13, no.1 (2024): 1-19.
10. Bergengruen, Vera. “How Ukraine Is Crowdsourcing Digital Evidence of War Crimes.”  TIME. April 18, 2022. Accessed date September 20, 2024. https://time.com/6166781/ukraine-crowdsourcing-war-crimes/
11. Berman, Eli, and David Laitin. Hard Targets: Theory and Evidence on Suicide Attacks. NBER Working Paper No. w11740, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=842475.
12. Bilgin, Pınar, and Karen Smith. Thinking Globally About World Politics: Beyond Global IR. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024.
13. Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
14. Bjarnegård, Elin, Amanda Lanigan, Susanna Campbell, Chiara Ruffa, Kristine Eck, and Kai Thaler. “Reflexivity from Theory to Practice: Introduction to the Symposium.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 22, no 1. (2024): 6-8.
15. Bjarnegård, Elin, Anders Engvall, Srisombop Jitpiromsri and Erik Melander. “Armed Violence and Patriarchal Values: A Survey of Young Men in Thailand and Their Military Experiences.” American Political Science Review 117, no. 2 (2023): 439-453.
16. Bleck, Jaimie, Chipo Dendere, and Boukary Sangaré. “Making North–South Research Collaborations Work.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51, no. 3 (2018): 554-558.
17. Bliesemann de Guevara, Berit, Ellen Furnari and Rachel Julian. “Researching with ‘Local’ Associates: Power, Trust, and Data in an Interpretive Project on Communities’ Conflict Knowledge in Myanmar.” Civil Wars 22, no. 4 (2020): 427-452.
18. Bloom, Mia. Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
19. “Botswana Harvard Health Partnership (BHP).” Harvard. 2022. Accessed September 23, 2024. https://bhp.org.bw.
20. Buhaug, Halvard, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. “Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space.” International Studies Quarterly 52, no. 2 (2008): 215-233.
21. Capan, Zeynep Gulsah. (2016). “Decolonizing International Relations?” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 1 (2016): 1–15.
22. Carter, David, Andrew C. Shaver, and Austin L. Wright. “Places to Hide: Terrain, Ethnicity, and Civil Conflict.” The Journal of Politics 81, no. 4: 1446-1465.
23. Christia, Fotini. Alliance Formation in Civil Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
24. Clauset, Aaron. “Trends and Fluctuations in the Severity of Interstate Wars.” Science Advances 4, (2018): 1-9.
25. Colaresi, Michael, and Zuhaib Mahmood. “Do the Robot: Lessons from Machine Learning to Improve Conflict Forecasting.” Journal of Peace Research 54, no. 2 (2017): 193-214.
26. Cunningham, David E. “Veto Players and Civil War Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 4 (2006): 875-892.
27. Cunningham, David E. Barriers to Peace in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
28. Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher, Marianne Dahl, and Anne Frugé. “Introducing the Strategies of Resistance Data Project.” Journal of Peace Research 57, no. 3 (2020): 482-491.
29. Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher. “Strategies of Resistance: Diversification and Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 61, no. 3 (2017): 591-605.
30. Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher. “Actor Fragmentation and Civil War Bargaining: How Internal Divisions Generate Civil Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 3 (2013): 659-672.
31. Davies, Shawn, Therése Pettersson, and Magnus Öberg. “Organized Violence 1989–2022, and the Return of Conflict Between States.” Journal of Peace Research 60, no. 4 (2023): 691-708.
32. Dorff, Cassy. “Violent and Nonviolent Resistance in Contexts of Prolonged Crisis: The Civilian Perspective.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4, no. 2 (2019): 286-291.
33. Eck, Kristine. “In Data We Trust? A Comparison of UCDP GED and ACLED Conflict Events Datasets.” Cooperation and Conflict 47, no. 1 (2012): 124-141
34. Eun, Yong-Soo. “Reflexive Solidarity: Toward a Broadening of What It Means to be “Scientific” in Global IR Knowledge.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 11, no. 1 (2022): 107-122.
35. Fawcett, Louise. “States and Sovereignty in the Middle East: Myths and Realities.” International Affairs 93, no. 4 (2017): 789-807.
36. Fazal, Tanisha M. “Life and Limb: New Estimates of Casualty Aversion in the United States.” International Studies Quarterly 65, no. 1 (2021): 160-172.
37. Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97, no. 1 (2003): 75-9.
38. Gade, Emily Kalah, Mohammed M. Hafez, and Michael Gabbay. “Fratricide in Rebel Movements: A Network Analysis of Syrian Militant Infighting.” Journal of Peace Research 56, no. 3 (2019): 321-335.
39. Gelardi, Maiken. “Blurring Borders: Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 45, no. 3 (2020): 143-161.
40. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede and Aaron Clauset. “Trends in Conflict: What Do We Know and What Can We Know?” In Oxford Handbook of International Security, edited by William Wolforth and Alexandra Gheciu, 227-245. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
41. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, Marianne Dahl, Scott Gates, and Belen Gonzalez. “Accounting for Numbers: Group Characteristics and the Choice of Violent and Nonviolent Tactics.” The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 16, no. 1: (2021): 1-22.
42. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, Nils W. Metternich, and Andrea Ruggeri. “Data and Progress in Peace and Conflict Research.” Journal of Peace Research 51, no. 2 (2014): 301-314.
43. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede.  “Advances in Data on Conflict and Dissent.” In Computational Conflict Research edited by Emanuel Deutschmann, Jan Lorenz, Luis G. Nardin, Davide Natalini, and Adalbert F. X. Wilhelm, 23-41. Switzerland: Springer Open, 2020.
44. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “One Without the Other? Prediction and Policy in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 66, no. 3 (2022): 1-8.
45. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “Transnational Dimensions of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 44, no. 3 (2007): 293-309.
46. Gohdes, Anita R., and Zachary C. Steinert‐Threlkeld. “Civilian Behavior on Social Media During Civil War.” American Journal of Political Science (2024): 1-16.
47. Goldenberg, Jacob, and Moshe Levy. “Distance is not Dead: Social Interaction and Geographical Distance in the Internet Era.” Computers and Society 2 (2009): 1-22.
48. Grossmann, Igor, Matthew Feinberg, Dawn C. Parker, Nicholas A. Christakis, Philip E. Tetlock, and William A. Cunningham. “AI and the Transformation of Social Science Research.” Science 380, no. 6650 (2023):1108-1109.
49. Halterman, Andrew, Benjamin E. Bagozzi, Andreas Beger, Philip A. Schrodt, and Grace I. Scarborough. “Plover and Polecat:  A New Political Event Ontology and Dataset.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Montreal, Canada, April 2023.
50. Hinds, Kristina. (2023). “Invisible on the Globe but Not in the Global: Decolonizing IR Using Small Island Vistas.” Review of International Studies 49, no. 3 (2023): 368-378.
51. Hintz, Lisel. “Academic Solidarity in the Wake of Disaster: Blueprint for an Online Writing Support Group.” PS: Political Science & Politics 1, no. 8 (2024): 1-8.
52. Horowitz, Donald L. Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Updated Edition with a New Preface. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
53. Hughes, Barry B. International Futures: Choices in the Creation of a New World Order. New York: Routledge, 1993.
54. Hughes, Barry B., Devin K. Joshi, Jonathan D. Moyer, Timothy D. Sisk, and José R. Solórzano. Strengthening Governance Globally: Forecasting the Next 50 Years. New York: Routledge, 2014.
55. Ishengoma, Johnson M.  “North–South Research Collaborations and Their Impact on Capacity Building: A Southern Perspective. In North–South Knowledge Networks: Towards Equitable Collaboration Between Academics, Donors, and Universities, edited by Tor Halvorsen and Jorun Nossum, 149-186. Cape Town: African Minds, 2016.
56. Jackson, Jaime A., Belgin San-Akca, and Zeev Maoz. “International Support Networks and the Calculus of Uprising.” Journal of Peace Research 57, no. 5 (2020): 632-647.
57. Jenne, Erin. “A Bargaining Theory of Minority Demands: Explaining the Dog That Did Not Bite in 1990s Yugoslavia.” International Studies Quarterly 48, no. 4 (2004): 729-754.
58. Jentsch, Birgit. “Making Southern Realities Count: Research Agendas and Design in North-South Collaborations.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7, no. 3 (2004): 259-269.
59. Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.
60. Julian, Rachel, Berit Bliesemann de Guevara, and Robin Redhead. “From Expert to Experiential Knowledge: Exploring the Inclusion of Local Experiences in Understanding Violence in Conflict.” Peacebuilding 7, no. 2 (2019): 210-225.
61. Justino, Patricia, Tilman Brück, and Philip Verwimp, eds. A Micro-Level Perspective on the Dynamics of Conflict, Violence, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
62. Kalin, Ilker, Marie Olson Lounsbery, and Frederic Pearson. “Major Power Politics and Non-violent Resistance Movements.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 39, no. 3 (2022): 241-265.
63. Kaplan, Oliver. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
64. King, Garry, and Will Lowe. “An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design.” International Organization 57, no. 3 (2003): 617-642.
65. Lemke, Douglas.  “African Lessons for International Relations Research.” World Politics 56, no. 1 (2003): 114-138.
66. Lohaus, Mathis, and Wiebke Wemheuer-Vogelaar. “Who Publishes Where? Exploring the Geographic Diversity of Global IR Journals.” International Studies Review 23, no. 3 (2021): 645-669.
67. Lyall, Jason, Graeme Blair, and Kosuke Imai. “Explaining Support for Combatants During Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review 107, no. 4 (2013): 679-705.
68. Maoz, Zeev, and Belgin San-Akca. “Rivalry and State Support of Non-state Armed Groups (NAGs), 1946–2001.” International Studies Quarterly 56, no. 4 (2012): 720-734.
69. Mueller, Hannes, and Christopher Rauh. “Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text.” American Political Science Review 112, no. 2 (2018): 358-375.
70. Olson Lounsbery, Marie, and Frederic Pearson. Civil Wars: Internal Struggles, Global Consequences. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.
71. Ordóñez‐Matamoros, Gonzalo, Michelle Vernot‐López, Ornello Moreno‐Mattar, and Luis Antonio Orozco. “Exploring the Effects of North–South and South–South Research Collaboration in Emerging Economies, the Colombian Case.” Review of Policy Research 37, no. 2 (2020): 174-200.
72. Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo, Susan Cozzens, and Margarita García-Luque, (2011, September). “North-South and South-South Research Collaboration: What Differences Does It Make for Developing Countries? - The Case of Colombia.” In 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, 1-10. IEEE, September 2011.
73. Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
74. Overos, Henry David, Roman Hlatky, Ojashwi Pathak, Harriet Goers, Jordan Gouws-Dewar, Katy Smith, Keith Padraic Chew, Jóhanna K Birnir, and Amy H Liu. “Coding with the Machines: Machine-assisted Coding of Rare Event Data.” PNAS Nexus 3, no. 5 (2024): 1-11.
75. Petrova, Marina G. “What Matters is Who Supports You: Diaspora and Foreign States as External Supporters and Militants’ Adoption of Nonviolence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63, no. 9 (2021): 2155–2179.
76. Phillips, Brian J., and Kevin T, Greene. “Where is Conflict Research? Western Bias in the Literature on Armed Violence.” International Studies Review, 24 no. 3 (2022): 1-25.
77. “Political Scientists Are Lousy Forecasters.” New York Times. June 23, 2012. Accessed date September, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/opinion/sunday/political-scientists-are-lousy-forecasters.html.
78. Quackenbush, Stephen L., and Michael Rudy. “Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace” Conflict Management and Peace Science 26, no. 3 (2009): 268-285.
79. Quinn, J. Michael, T. David Mason, and Mehmet Gurses. “Sustaining the Peace: Determinants of Civil War Recurrence.” International Interactions 33, no. 2 (2007): 167-193.
80. Rousseau, David L., Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter, and Paul K. Huth. “Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918–88.” American Political Science Review 90, no. 3 (1996): 512-533.
81. Rubin, Michael A. “Rebel Territorial Control and Civilian Collective Action in Civil War: Evidence from the Communist Insurgency in the Philippines.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 64, no. 2-3 (2020): 459-489.
82. Russett, Bruce, Christopher Layne, David E. Spiro, and Michael W. Doyle. “The Democratic Peace.” International Security 19, no. 4 (1995): 164-184.
83. Schrodt, Philip A., and James E. Yonamine. “A Guide to Event Data: Past, Present, and Future.” All Azimuth: A Journal for Foreign Policy and Peace 2, no. 2 (2013): 5-22.
84. Sen, Somdeep. “Decolonizing to Reimagine International Relations: An Introduction.” Review of International Studies 49, no. 3 (2023): 339-345.
85. Shahi, Deepshikha. “Global IR Research Programme: From Perplexities to Progressions.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 13, no. 1 (2024): 1-22.
86. Sune, Engin. “Western-Centric Moments in Homegrown IR Theories: Dependency, Chinese and African Schools.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 13, no. 1 (2024): 1-22.
87. Taleb, Nassim N. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House, 2007.
88. Tetlock, Philip E. Expert Political Judgment: How Good is it? How Can we Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
89. Tetlock, Philip E., and Dan Gardner. Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York: Random House, 2015.
90. The Perils of Prediction.” The Economist. June 2, 2007. Accessed date September, 2024. https://www.economist.com/letters-to-the-editor-the-inbox/2007/07/15/the-perils-of-prediction-june-2nd
91. Toft, Monica Duffy. “Ending Civil Wars: A Case for Rebel Victory?” International Security 34, no. 4 (2010): 7-36.
92. Tokdemir, Efe, and Seden Akcinaroglu. “State and Non-State Actors in World Politics.” In Handbook of Research Methods in International Relations, edited by R. Joseph Huddleston et al., 167-182. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
93. Tucker, Karen. “Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement.” International Political Sociology 12, no. 3 (2018): 215-232.
94. “Ukraine Relief: Two Years into the War, Response Continues,” Direct Relief. February 2024, September, 2024 https://www.directrelief.org/2024/02/ukraine-relief-two-years-into-the-war-response-continues/.
95. Van Baalen, Sebastian. “Civilian Protest in Civil War: Insights from Côte d’Ivoire.” American Political Science Review 118, no. 2 (2024): 815-830.
96. Van Holt, Tracey, Jeffery C. Johnson, Shiloh Moates, and Kathleen M. Carley. “The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research.” PlosOne 11, no. 4 (2016): 1-14.
97. Vasquez, John A., and Brandon Valeriano. “Classification of Interstate Wars.” The Journal of Politics 72, no. 2 (2010): 292-309.
98. Vesco, Paola, Håvard Hegre, Michael Colaresi, Remco Bastiaan Jansen, Adeline Lo, Gregor Reisch, and, Nils Weidmann. “United They Stand: Findings from an Escalation Prediction Competition.” International Interactions 48, no. 4 (2022): 860–896.
99. Viterna, Jocelyn. Women in War: The Micro-Processes of Mobilization in El Salvador. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
100. Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687-727.
101. Walter, Barbara F. “Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2 (2006): 313-330.
102. Walter, Barbara F. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization 51, no. 3 (1997): 335-364.
103. Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
104. Watson, Clare. “Rise of the Preprint: How Rapid Data Sharing during COVID-19 has Changed Science Forever.” Nature Medicine 28, (2022): 2–5.
105. Wemheuer-Vogelaar, Wiebke, Peter Marcus Kristensen, and Mathis Lohaus. “The Global Division of Labor in a Not So Global Discipline.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 11, no. 1 (2022): 3-27.
106. Yassine-Hamdan, Nahla, and Frederic Pearson. Arab Approaches to Conflict Resolution: Mediation, Negotiation and Settlement of Political Disputes. New York: Routledge, 2014. London: Routledge, 2011.